search for: talkies

Hello guys, I''m getting this weird error when trying to run the specs using "rake spec": /home/mauricio/NetBeansProjects/talkies/vendor/rails/actionpack/lib/action_controller/test_process.rb:471:in `method_missing'': undefined method `full_description'' for #<Spec::Rails::Example::ControllerExampleGroup::Subclass_73::Subclass_9:0x7f5fdca4a810> (NoMethodError) from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1....

Anyone know if it is possible to control how aggressively the "Aggressive" mode behaves. Meaning, is it possible to dial back the aggressive mode to have a happy medium between Regular and the Aggressive defaults. I have a situation where Normal echo cancellation is not quite enough, however when I turn on aggressive mode We are attacking it to hard and I am unhappy with the walkie

Hi All, I have a ticket open with Digium, but based on their previous lack of support for the Asterisk Appliance, I'm not really holding my breath - and, honestly, I'm not 100% convinced it's a Digium issue in the first place (but I don't know where else to point fingers). We have an AEX-804E (PCI Express, 4 FXO ports, Hardware Echo Cancellation) in a Dell PowerEdge 1950 with

We've had an issue since we went live nearly two years ago on Asterisk where people complain about not being able to talk while someone else is talking. I had assumed for a very long time this was because of the phones we went live with (Grandstream GXP-2000's) and for the longest time I believed this was a speakerphone problem only. Last week during budgets, a request to buy new

Hey sorry to hijack this thread, but I just remembered a request I wanted to make to the speex devs. I tried using the activity detector, but I just couldn't get it working well. I ended up using my own, where I think it just considered voice on if it passed a certain threshold (I know, pretty primitive). I also tried one that checked for a signal, like if the strongest frequency

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:13:29PM +0900, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 16:05 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > Short answer - platforms need a way to discover, and express different > > security requirements of different devices. > > Sure. PLATFORMS need that. Do not let it go anywhere near your device > drivers. Including the virtio

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:13:29PM +0900, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 16:05 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > Short answer - platforms need a way to discover, and express different > > security requirements of different devices. > > Sure. PLATFORMS need that. Do not let it go anywhere near your device > drivers. Including the virtio

----------------------------------------------------------------------- Martin T soovib m?ningaid Google'i uusi lahedaid tooteid kasutades t?husamalt suhelda. Kui teil on juba Gmail v?i Google Talk, k?lastage: http://mail.google.com/mail/b-b1582f7c47-bb95c4c048-xaFhqyy53hFz38AqKrnAp3IUOaM Kasutajaga Martin T vestlemiseks peate kl?psama seda linki. Selleks, et hankida endale Gmail ? rohkem

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:32:34PM +0900, David Woodhouse wrote: > > I don't have a problem with extending DMA API to address > > more usecases. > > No, this isn't an extension. This is fixing a bug, on certain platforms > where the DMA API has currently done the wrong thing. > > We have historically worked around that bug by introducing *another* > bug,

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:32:34PM +0900, David Woodhouse wrote: > > I don't have a problem with extending DMA API to address > > more usecases. > > No, this isn't an extension. This is fixing a bug, on certain platforms > where the DMA API has currently done the wrong thing. > > We have historically worked around that bug by introducing *another* > bug,

...iate, with both IE and Firefox being critical on Windows). Unfortunately, as near as I can tell, that's not possible yet. Or am I mistaken? To be clear, I understand that Theora is the video codec, Vorbis is the audio codec, and Ogg is the container format. I need a solution that works for talkies. (: And for audio-only, of course. Thanks for your advice! -- Thomas Boutell Boutell.Com, Inc. http://www.boutell.com/

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:35:27PM +0900, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 13:35 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > E.g. on intel x86, there's an option iommu=pt which does the 1:1 > > thing for devices when used by kernel, but enables > > the iommu if used by userspace/VMs. > > That's none of your business. > > You call the DMA API when

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:35:27PM +0900, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 13:35 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > E.g. on intel x86, there's an option iommu=pt which does the 1:1 > > thing for devices when used by kernel, but enables > > the iommu if used by userspace/VMs. > > That's none of your business. > > You call the DMA API when

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.7 - Release Date: 07/12/04

On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 16:05 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Short answer - platforms need a way to discover, and express different > security requirements of different devices. Sure. PLATFORMS need that. Do not let it go anywhere near your device drivers. Including the virtio drivers. > If they continue to lack that, we'll need a custom API in virtio, > and while this

On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 16:22 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:13:29PM +0900, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 16:05 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > > Short answer - platforms need a way to discover, and express > > > different > > > security requirements of different devices. > > > >

> Anyway, my request is, can you build in a pre and post buffer into the > VAD? In mine, if I detect voice any time between now and say a quarter > second later, I start sending, and then I wait a half second or whatever > after I stop detecting. You pretty much have to have this, or people > start getting anxious talking over an internet stream. They have to > enunciate

Greetings everyone, I've been having some strange issues with my Asterisk box and some snom phones. In some cases, when I talk, the sound in the other end is cut off, I stop earing the background noise - looks like a walkie-talkie. I've tried this between phones in the same network and in all but one this happens. The one where it doesn't happen is the one connected directly to the

Hi, I'm trying to get Asterisk working with the AVM B1 card. I've tried every instruction set I can find, but to no avail. I think I'm getting mixed up as to what Zaptel/CAPI configuration to use. If someone is currently using one of these cards, would it be possible to mail me a few bits of the important config files? Sorry if I should have included something else too, but let me

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:32:34PM +0900, David Woodhouse wrote: >> > I don't have a problem with extending DMA API to address >> > more usecases. >> >> No, this isn't an extension. This is fixing a bug, on certain platforms >> where the DMA API has currently done