search for: talkie

Hello guys, I''m getting this weird error when trying to run the specs using "rake spec": /home/mauricio/NetBeansProjects/talkies/vendor/rails/actionpack/lib/action_controller/test_process.rb:471:in `method_missing'': undefined method `full_description'' for #<Spec::Rails::Example::ControllerExampleGroup::Subclass_73::Subclass_9:0x7f5fdca4a810> (NoMethodError) from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1...

...Meaning, is it possible to dial back the aggressive mode to have a happy medium between Regular and the Aggressive defaults. I have a situation where Normal echo cancellation is not quite enough, however when I turn on aggressive mode We are attacking it to hard and I am unhappy with the walkie talkie behaviour of the Aggressive mode. Thanks for any feedback. ~ron

Hi All, I have a ticket open with Digium, but based on their previous lack of support for the Asterisk Appliance, I'm not really holding my breath - and, honestly, I'm not 100% convinced it's a Digium issue in the first place (but I don't know where else to point fingers). We have an AEX-804E (PCI Express, 4 FXO ports, Hardware Echo Cancellation) in a Dell PowerEdge 1950 with

We've had an issue since we went live nearly two years ago on Asterisk where people complain about not being able to talk while someone else is talking. I had assumed for a very long time this was because of the phones we went live with (Grandstream GXP-2000's) and for the longest time I believed this was a speakerphone problem only. Last week during budgets, a request to buy new

.... They have to enunciate expressions like "ya probably" because the ya isn't detected, only the probably. By sending a bit of padding around the detection, it also prevents the detector from dropping out mid-sentence. It takes it from being a screaming contest over a walkie talkie, to a normal telephone conversation. You might be reluctant to do this, because you have to add in some state information instead of just focusing on the current buffer, but the quality improvement is enormous. I'd just like to be able to pass a pre and post value to the VAD in millisec...

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:13:29PM +0900, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 16:05 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > Short answer - platforms need a way to discover, and express different > > security requirements of different devices. > > Sure. PLATFORMS need that. Do not let it go anywhere near your device > drivers. Including the virtio

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:13:29PM +0900, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 16:05 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > Short answer - platforms need a way to discover, and express different > > security requirements of different devices. > > Sure. PLATFORMS need that. Do not let it go anywhere near your device > drivers. Including the virtio

----------------------------------------------------------------------- Martin T soovib m?ningaid Google'i uusi lahedaid tooteid kasutades t?husamalt suhelda. Kui teil on juba Gmail v?i Google Talk, k?lastage: http://mail.google.com/mail/b-b1582f7c47-bb95c4c048-xaFhqyy53hFz38AqKrnAp3IUOaM Kasutajaga Martin T vestlemiseks peate kl?psama seda linki. Selleks, et hankida endale Gmail ? rohkem

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:32:34PM +0900, David Woodhouse wrote: > > I don't have a problem with extending DMA API to address > > more usecases. > > No, this isn't an extension. This is fixing a bug, on certain platforms > where the DMA API has currently done the wrong thing. > > We have historically worked around that bug by introducing *another* > bug,

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:32:34PM +0900, David Woodhouse wrote: > > I don't have a problem with extending DMA API to address > > more usecases. > > No, this isn't an extension. This is fixing a bug, on certain platforms > where the DMA API has currently done the wrong thing. > > We have historically worked around that bug by introducing *another* > bug,

...iate, with both IE and Firefox being critical on Windows). Unfortunately, as near as I can tell, that's not possible yet. Or am I mistaken? To be clear, I understand that Theora is the video codec, Vorbis is the audio codec, and Ogg is the container format. I need a solution that works for talkies. (: And for audio-only, of course. Thanks for your advice! -- Thomas Boutell Boutell.Com, Inc. http://www.boutell.com/

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:35:27PM +0900, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 13:35 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > E.g. on intel x86, there's an option iommu=pt which does the 1:1 > > thing for devices when used by kernel, but enables > > the iommu if used by userspace/VMs. > > That's none of your business. > > You call the DMA API when

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:35:27PM +0900, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 13:35 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > E.g. on intel x86, there's an option iommu=pt which does the 1:1 > > thing for devices when used by kernel, but enables > > the iommu if used by userspace/VMs. > > That's none of your business. > > You call the DMA API when

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.7 - Release Date: 07/12/04

On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 16:05 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Short answer - platforms need a way to discover, and express different > security requirements of different devices. Sure. PLATFORMS need that. Do not let it go anywhere near your device drivers. Including the virtio drivers. > If they continue to lack that, we'll need a custom API in virtio, > and while this

On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 16:22 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:13:29PM +0900, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 16:05 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > > Short answer - platforms need a way to discover, and express > > > different > > > security requirements of different devices. > > > >

...to > enunciate expressions like "ya probably" because the ya isn't detected, > only the probably. By sending a bit of padding around the detection, it > also prevents the detector from dropping out mid-sentence. It takes it > from being a screaming contest over a walkie talkie, to a normal > telephone conversation. > > You might be reluctant to do this, because you have to add in some state > information instead of just focusing on the current buffer, but the > quality improvement is enormous. I'd just like to be able to pass a pre > and post valu...

Greetings everyone, I've been having some strange issues with my Asterisk box and some snom phones. In some cases, when I talk, the sound in the other end is cut off, I stop earing the background noise - looks like a walkie-talkie. I've tried this between phones in the same network and in all but one this happens. The one where it doesn't happen is the one connected directly to the router. I've tried different codecs with and without transcoding, including g722, and, on that phone, it all goes well. Could this h...

Hi, I'm trying to get Asterisk working with the AVM B1 card. I've tried every instruction set I can find, but to no avail. I think I'm getting mixed up as to what Zaptel/CAPI configuration to use. If someone is currently using one of these cards, would it be possible to mail me a few bits of the important config files? Sorry if I should have included something else too, but let me

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:32:34PM +0900, David Woodhouse wrote: >> > I don't have a problem with extending DMA API to address >> > more usecases. >> >> No, this isn't an extension. This is fixing a bug, on certain platforms >> where the DMA API has currently done