search for: stll

Hi, folks I am "stll" trying to build LLVM-GCC 4.2 on a Linux/PS3 machine, which has a 64-bit OS. Here is my system information and configuration options: ----------------------------------------------------------------- $ uname -a Linux ps3 2.6.32-rc2-00995-g96ebbe6-dirty #2 SMP Fri Oct 2 15:12:28 CST 2009 pp...

...this will give the correct answer: [1] 1 2 above code lacks reusability, so It should use a for loop: myIntersect<-mySplit[[1]]$product for (i in 1:length(mySplit)-1){ myIntersect<-intersect(myIntersect,mySplit[[i+1]]$product) } It's correct too, but stll too complex, so my question is: Can I do the same thing just use another similar intersect function (without for/repeat/while). What's this simple function's name ? 2.how to do a relative computation after split (notice: not befor split)? create data: myData1 <- data.frame...

Hi all: I am a newbie to vorbis, and I want to develop vorbis decoder onto TI c6701 evm board. And I try the tremor code and libvorbis and the code from http://www.xiph.org/archives/tremor/200210/0001.html . But all of them stll work good in MSVC but terrible in c6701. I dont know wher the problem is??Problem of code or problem of memory allocation?? it decodes almost noise,.... When I trace the code I found some fit_value[] between fit_value[0] and fit_value[1] were wrong before /* unwrap positive values and reconsitute...

Hi, folks I am trying to build LLVM-GCC 4.2 on a Linux/PowerPC machine. Actually, the PowerPC is a PS3. The source was downloaded from http://llvm.org/releases/2.8/llvm-gcc-4.2-2.8.source.tgz Here is my system information and configuration options: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- $ uname -a Linux ps3 2.6.32-rc2-00995-g96ebbe6-dirty #2 SMP Fri Oct 2

Hi, In some cases the number of arguments passed as ... must be determined inside a function, without evaluating the arguments themselves. I use the following construct: dotlength <- function(...) length(substitute(expression(...))) - 1L # Usage (returns 3): dotlength(1, 4, something = undefined) How can I define a method for length() which could be called directly on `...`? Or is it an

On ons, 2011-01-05 at 15:23 +0800, ext 陳韋任 wrote: > Hi, folks > > I am "stll" trying to build LLVM-GCC 4.2 on a Linux/PS3 machine, which > has a 64-bit OS. Don't know if it helps, but clang at least builds nicely. Unfortunately I have a 32bit runtime installed and this seems to cause problems somewhere - clang defaults to 64bit assembly (if I understood the out...

This question is better aimed at the r-help mailinglist as it is not about developing R itself. having said that, I can only gues why you want to do this, but why not do something like this: f <- function(...){ L <- list(...) len <- length() # you can stll pass the ... as follows: do.call(someotherfunction, L) } -Mark Op do 3 mei 2018 om 16:29 schreef D?nes T?th <toth.denes at kogentum.hu>: > Hi, > > > In some cases the number of arguments passed as ... must be determined > inside a function, without evaluating the argumen...

...nventory is taken compartmentwise and so this information of all the plots in a compartment is taken and generalised over all the pixels falling in that compartment. To make the estimation more realistic, i decided to use the impute opton in r. The yai requires me to enter the x and y variable. I stll haven't figured out how i should put my datasets to impute the values of variables like Basal area, volume for only those pixels for which no data is available. is msn or randomforest a better option. I tried to work on the example MoscowMtStJoe dataset. But I wasn't able to figure out how...

...urns Mocha::Mock as the type, not what the :type key says it should return. I tried alias Mocha:Mock :type to :otype in my test and in lib/mocha/mock.rb bot to no avail. The alias takes, in that s.otype returns "Mocha::Mock" but the stub method does not really redefine the type method, it stll returns Mocha::Mock Ed -- Ed Howland http://greenprogrammer.blogspot.com

Hi,

...he r-help mailinglist as it is not about > developing R itself. > > > having said that, > > I can only gues why you want to do this, but why not do something like > this: > > > f <- function(...){ > L <- list(...) > len <- length() > # you can stll pass the ... as follows: > do.call(someotherfunction, L) > > } > > > -Mark > > Op do 3 mei 2018 om 16:29 schreef D?nes T?th <toth.denes at kogentum.hu>: > > > Hi, > > > > > > In some cases the number of arguments passed as ... must be deter...

I've been working on a fixed point mec3 echo can. The old "mec3" which crashed a lot of peoples machines because it was floating point in the kernel is now available as "mec3-float.h". I'd appreciate any testing / feedback on the new fixed point mec3 echo can. Thanks! Mark

Hello again. I'm stll struggling trying to terminate calls from SIP through Asterisk and throught my H323 gateways... Basically the call is accepted by GnuGK but then dropped with *reason = unreachableDestination <<null>>* I did a *debug trc 10* on GnuGK and looked at the sessions... one from X-Lite thro...

I just found this one: http://tinyurl.com/3c3mfa David, are there any other RSpec books in the works? With Regards, Cody Skidmore

I just found a rather embarrassing bug in PXELINUX -- and what's worse -- I wrote an email about it and killed it off accidentally :-/ It appears PXELINUX doesn't free its internal socket buffers (it has 32 of them) when it gets an error reply from the server, including "file not found." This means it will eventually run out of sockets and "go deaf." This

...inux at zytor.com >>Subject: [syslinux] More features in Syslinux 2.08 >> >> >>More features in 2.08 which I would like to see >> >>**** A way by which DOS images can find out the command line >>arguments >>sent (and identfy the fact that memdisk is stll around?) >> >>I hope to use such a feature as follows: Instead of hanving >>multiple DOS >>images on my isolinux based CD, I will have only one. Based on the >>command line argument I can execute different DOS batch scripts (just >>like I do for the linux sid...

On 20.03.22 16:02, Roger Price wrote: >I received the following comment from the Independent Submissions Editor (ISE): > > The command VER is hazardous because it encourages exploiting of > implementation peculiarities that are not well documented in a > protocol.? The best example of such a failure is the browser version > field in HTTP.? A complete disaster.? You should warn

Hi there, I am working with opt-6.0 and try to generate a call graph of libsndfile, but it seems the call graph doesn't cover all call relationship. Actually, I am doing static analysis on *CVE-2014-8130*, which is a zero division on libtiff/tif_write.c TIFFWriteScanline. (see https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2014-8130) Theoretically, the main function in

I''m using shorewall with openvpn and traffic shaping at all of our offices. I have noticed for a while that occasionally ping times are excessive. Usually this is during overnight off site backups but some times during the day. I have assumed the is was an ISP issue but now I''m suspecting it''s problem with openvpn and traffic shaping. In the test case have 2 sites

What''s the best way to handle a requirement that shows up as a sub-requirement requirement in other features? For example let''s say users can enter dates in various forms throughout my application. There is one set of global rules specifying the formats in which dates may be entered, and how they are interpreted. I put that in one feature. In various other features, like