Displaying 20 results from an estimated 880 matches for "stickys".
Did you mean:
sticky
2013 Jul 14
1
There is an error in chmod(1)
There is an error in the chmod(1) man page.
tingo at kg-v2$ uname -a
FreeBSD kg-v2.kg4.no 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #6: Fri Apr 27 23:50:55 CEST 2012
root at kg-v2.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
tingo at kg-v2$ apropos ^sticky
sticky(7) - sticky text and append-only directories
tingo at kg-v2$ man 1 chmod | grep sticky
1000 (the sticky bit). See chmod(2)
2007 Mar 03
1
sticky windows and rotate focus
Hi everyone,
One thing that has always annoyed me about compiz is how rotate
handles sticky windows. If you have a sticky window on your desktop,
it will usually (always?) get focus when you rotate to a different
face on the cube. This happens even when other windows have been
focused more recently on the face you rotate to.
This seems like silly behaviour, because sticky windows are (for me)
2014 Dec 31
0
[Bug 11027] New: Sticky bit not set when using --chmod=D+t alone, without --perms
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11027
Bug ID: 11027
Summary: Sticky bit not set when using --chmod=D+t alone,
without --perms
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.9
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
Assignee:
2007 May 27
2
[PATCH] add 'sticky' mode to cube to allow sticky+not-on-bottom windows to stick to the screen when the screen is transformed
I've attached the patch since I don't yet have an easy way to make git
format-patch and kmail play nice together. The basic idea is during a
rotate/other cube transform, 'sticky' windows stick to the screen instead of
being redrawn once per face (its an option, the default is the old behaviour)
Consider this, please, essentially an RFC - this particular behaviour was
2012 Jul 16
2
Tk grid problem
Hi everybody,
I have a problem with the grid function in tk.
I juste try to put 4 buttons like this:
-------------------
| | |
| | C |
| A |--------|
| | |
---------- D |
| | |
| B | |
-------------------
A is 2x2
C is 1x2
B is 1x2
D is 2x2
but the code bellow dont work :
require(tcltk)
tt <-
2002 Oct 30
1
sticky bit, etc.
I have a question about samba and sticky bits. I have a share with the
following configuration:
[documents]
comment = documents
path = /shares/documents
public = no
writeable = yes
printable = no
valid users = @lan1
force user = docadmin
force group = lan1
create mode = 0440
force create mode = 0440
directory mode = 1770
force directory mode = 1770
delete read only = no
2011 Jun 16
1
Sticky bit problem
Hi
We are building a Linux app under Centos 5.3, using gnu make 3.81 and gcc 4.12. The working directory is on a remote machine and is either a Samba share or a Windows 7 share. We find that in the case of a Windows 7 share the resulting executable has the sticky bit set in group:
On Windows 7 share:
-rwxrwSrwx 1 <snip> myapp
On Samba share:
-rwxrwx--x+ 1 <snip> myapp
The
2007 Feb 05
2
application 'allway sync' evades sticky bit?!
Hi,
am running:
Redhat EL4.4 i386, Samba 3.0.23d from Sernet, ext3 fs
Samba as PDC
Someone's got the idea to have one big share with access managed by
directory's sticky bit.
This works perfectly well when normal XP or W2k clients work with their
explorer.
But: With 'allway sync', an app to synchronize for example between
laptop and fileserver the program is somehow able to
2006 Nov 07
4
"Sticky" Polycom 501 keys and handset
Hi,
I've recently bought new Polycom 501 phones, upgraded to bootrom 3.2.2 and
SIP 2.0.1. I just noticed something, which I first blamed on Asterisk and
NATs (a 2 second silence at the beginning of a call). Something I've
noticed also on my old phone (which is having the same problem now, but its
also been upgraded).
My keys are sticky. Simple as that. Sometimes I press a number
2016 Dec 21
0
Can Linux ACLs override Sticky Bits on a Samba Share?
Hi,
I have an Ubuntu Linux server where I use Sticky Bits to help enforce specific permissions on Samba shares:
-- Each Samba share is associated with a unique Linux group
-- Only members of the group can access the share
-- All members of the group can create new files and directories in the share
-- SGID is set on all directories.
-- The "creator" of any new file will be the
2003 Nov 04
1
ACL + sticky bit
Lo folks,
I got a little question. Ive set up samba 3.0.0 + RH 8. And since ACL within samba only works on share niveau i wanted to implement POSIX ACL.
I was thinking what is the difference between "full" access and "change" on a NT4 server. As far as i could think the difference is that "full" acces can delete a file and "change" can only change it. So i
2013 Feb 20
1
Sticky results
Hi there,
I have a xapian index whose results are being sorted by a value, with (PHP bindings):
$enquire->set_sort_by_value($sort_data_value);
This is because I want the results returned in chronological order of publication date. However, I now have a need to have certain results be 'sticky' at the top of the resultset, regardless of their publication date. Obviously there are
2008 Sep 15
2
Tmp directory and sticky
I noticed after my install that the tmp directory was
A- not a sticky
B- still executable
I went and changed etc/fstab to add loop,noexec,nosuid,rw, which I hope is
the right thing to do.
I rebooted and it looks like it worked.
When doing an ls -l on the main directory, the tmp folder lit up all green
in putty (cool, I hope)
But the chmods I did with winscp will not take effect (they do on
2006 Jun 02
2
Sticky Options to Find?
Is there a way to provide "sticky" options to ActiveRecord::Base::Find ?
I''m thinking something with a use model like:
class Function < ActiveRecord::Base
sticky :conditions => "lft > 0", :order => "lft ASC"
end
Where all subsuquent find operations have those options applied. In this
case:
Function.find(:all)
Would actually be equivalent
2008 Feb 04
2
[Bug 1436] New: scp -p does not preserve sticky bit (01000)
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1436
Summary: scp -p does not preserve sticky bit (01000)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 4.7p1
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: scp
AssignedTo: bitbucket at
2014 Aug 13
1
acl sticky bit?
Sorry to ask a windows question her but I didn't know if a windows group
would know about the sticky bit.
I have a windows server that is our primary file server in our samba
domain. I am hoping that windows as something like the sticky bit that can
be set on a folder where in only the creator of the file can modify the
file. Any easy way to do this using ntfs acls ?
--
David Bear
mobile:
2003 Jan 18
1
UNIX/SAMBA file permission interaction
Hi Everyone,
Just prior to christmas I asked a question relating to the interaction
of SAMBA with UNIX permissions. The answer I got back was to set the
sticky bit on the folder in question. I did this and sure enough SAMBA
then followed the behaviour I expected.
Can any one explain to me why?
For those of you baffled, this is what occurs:
Without the sticky bit set on a folder that has rwx
2000 Jan 25
1
sticky bit on directories created via net neighborhood
I've set "force directory mode = 1775" in smb.conf, but when
I make directories in a share through network neighborhood, I
end up with 0775, i.e. user has rwx, group rwx, others rx.
The sticky bit is not getting set.
What am I doing wrong?
thanks in advance,
Ed Schernau
ed@schernau.com
Network Architect
2011 Feb 18
1
load_usershare_shares: is not owned by root or does not have the sticky bit 't'
Dear
I encounter this error on Samba 3.0.28a, i would like to know how to fix
it,
The file is owned by root, i don't understand whats going wrong...
smbd[15232]: [2011/02/18 16:32:22, 0]
param/loadparm.c:load_usershare_shares(4878)
Feb 18 16:32:22 virtualbox smbd[15232]: load_usershare_shares:
directory /var/lib/samba/usershares/data is not owned by root or does
not have the sticky bit
2012 Jan 10
2
making network configuration sticky in nexenta core/napp-it
Sorry for an off-topic question, but anyone knows how to make
network configuration (done with ifconfig/route add) sticky in
nexenta core/napp-it?
After reboot system reverts to 0.0.0.0 and doesn''t listen
to /etc/defaultrouter
Thanks.