search for: sticki

There is an error in the chmod(1) man page. tingo at kg-v2$ uname -a FreeBSD kg-v2.kg4.no 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #6: Fri Apr 27 23:50:55 CEST 2012 root at kg-v2.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 tingo at kg-v2$ apropos ^sticky sticky(7) - sticky text and append-only directories tingo at kg-v2$ man 1 chmod | grep sticky 1000 (the sticky bit). See chmod(2)

Hi everyone, One thing that has always annoyed me about compiz is how rotate handles sticky windows. If you have a sticky window on your desktop, it will usually (always?) get focus when you rotate to a different face on the cube. This happens even when other windows have been focused more recently on the face you rotate to. This seems like silly behaviour, because sticky windows are (for me)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11027 Bug ID: 11027 Summary: Sticky bit not set when using --chmod=D+t alone, without --perms Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee:

I've attached the patch since I don't yet have an easy way to make git format-patch and kmail play nice together. The basic idea is during a rotate/other cube transform, 'sticky' windows stick to the screen instead of being redrawn once per face (its an option, the default is the old behaviour) Consider this, please, essentially an RFC - this particular behaviour was

Hi everybody, I have a problem with the grid function in tk. I juste try to put 4 buttons like this: ------------------- | | | | | C | | A |--------| | | | ---------- D | | | | | B | | ------------------- A is 2x2 C is 1x2 B is 1x2 D is 2x2 but the code bellow dont work : require(tcltk) tt <-

I have a question about samba and sticky bits. I have a share with the following configuration: [documents] comment = documents path = /shares/documents public = no writeable = yes printable = no valid users = @lan1 force user = docadmin force group = lan1 create mode = 0440 force create mode = 0440 directory mode = 1770 force directory mode = 1770 delete read only = no

Hi We are building a Linux app under Centos 5.3, using gnu make 3.81 and gcc 4.12. The working directory is on a remote machine and is either a Samba share or a Windows 7 share. We find that in the case of a Windows 7 share the resulting executable has the sticky bit set in group: On Windows 7 share: -rwxrwSrwx 1 <snip> myapp On Samba share: -rwxrwx--x+ 1 <snip> myapp The

Hi, am running: Redhat EL4.4 i386, Samba 3.0.23d from Sernet, ext3 fs Samba as PDC Someone's got the idea to have one big share with access managed by directory's sticky bit. This works perfectly well when normal XP or W2k clients work with their explorer. But: With 'allway sync', an app to synchronize for example between laptop and fileserver the program is somehow able to

Hi, I've recently bought new Polycom 501 phones, upgraded to bootrom 3.2.2 and SIP 2.0.1. I just noticed something, which I first blamed on Asterisk and NATs (a 2 second silence at the beginning of a call). Something I've noticed also on my old phone (which is having the same problem now, but its also been upgraded). My keys are sticky. Simple as that. Sometimes I press a number

Hi, I have an Ubuntu Linux server where I use Sticky Bits to help enforce specific permissions on Samba shares: -- Each Samba share is associated with a unique Linux group -- Only members of the group can access the share -- All members of the group can create new files and directories in the share -- SGID is set on all directories. -- The "creator" of any new file will be the

Lo folks, I got a little question. Ive set up samba 3.0.0 + RH 8. And since ACL within samba only works on share niveau i wanted to implement POSIX ACL. I was thinking what is the difference between "full" access and "change" on a NT4 server. As far as i could think the difference is that "full" acces can delete a file and "change" can only change it. So i

...setting a publication date in the distant future, but I'm wondering if there is a best practice way to do this within the Xapian world. I considered that perhaps the answer was to remove the sort by value and replace it with a custom posting source that combined that value with the post's stickiness to give the post a weight. Would that be the right approach? If I do that how do I turn off all the default relevance weight logic? Cheers, Andrew

I noticed after my install that the tmp directory was A- not a sticky B- still executable I went and changed etc/fstab to add loop,noexec,nosuid,rw, which I hope is the right thing to do. I rebooted and it looks like it worked. When doing an ls -l on the main directory, the tmp folder lit up all green in putty (cool, I hope) But the chmods I did with winscp will not take effect (they do on

Is there a way to provide "sticky" options to ActiveRecord::Base::Find ? I''m thinking something with a use model like: class Function < ActiveRecord::Base sticky :conditions => "lft > 0", :order => "lft ASC" end Where all subsuquent find operations have those options applied. In this case: Function.find(:all) Would actually be equivalent

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1436 Summary: scp -p does not preserve sticky bit (01000) Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: scp AssignedTo: bitbucket at

Sorry to ask a windows question her but I didn't know if a windows group would know about the sticky bit. I have a windows server that is our primary file server in our samba domain. I am hoping that windows as something like the sticky bit that can be set on a folder where in only the creator of the file can modify the file. Any easy way to do this using ntfs acls ? -- David Bear mobile:

Hi Everyone, Just prior to christmas I asked a question relating to the interaction of SAMBA with UNIX permissions. The answer I got back was to set the sticky bit on the folder in question. I did this and sure enough SAMBA then followed the behaviour I expected. Can any one explain to me why? For those of you baffled, this is what occurs: Without the sticky bit set on a folder that has rwx

I've set "force directory mode = 1775" in smb.conf, but when I make directories in a share through network neighborhood, I end up with 0775, i.e. user has rwx, group rwx, others rx. The sticky bit is not getting set. What am I doing wrong? thanks in advance, Ed Schernau ed@schernau.com Network Architect

Dear I encounter this error on Samba 3.0.28a, i would like to know how to fix it, The file is owned by root, i don't understand whats going wrong... smbd[15232]: [2011/02/18 16:32:22, 0] param/loadparm.c:load_usershare_shares(4878) Feb 18 16:32:22 virtualbox smbd[15232]: load_usershare_shares: directory /var/lib/samba/usershares/data is not owned by root or does not have the sticky bit

Sorry for an off-topic question, but anyone knows how to make network configuration (done with ifconfig/route add) sticky in nexenta core/napp-it? After reboot system reverts to 0.0.0.0 and doesn''t listen to /etc/defaultrouter Thanks.