search for: srs0

...e.com" :mime text: The script works fine, but I get a reply for every msg sent: # grep sieve.*sent /var/log/mail Jul 26 10:17:26 neon dovecot: lmtp(4367, per.acm at example.com): Pj0iEbx3Lk4PEQAA0G3O/A: sieve: msgid=<4E2E7807.8000301 at example.com>: sent vacation response to <SRS0+9c3c5bbcdb70e56f=2N=example.com=per.jessen at srs.example.org> Jul 26 10:29:06 neon dovecot: lmtp(10165, per.acm at example.com): Hbm3DhJ6Lk61JwAA0G3O/A: sieve: msgid=<4E2E7ABF.3090804 at example.com>: sent vacation response to <SRS0+9c3c5bbcdb70e56f=2N=example.com=per.jessen at srs.exa...

Hi i have similiar problem like here: http://www.iredmail.org/forum/topic11833-iredmail-support-vocation-respone-unknown-user.html email send : from : web123 at gmail.com to : jacka at mail.com vocation sent back from : jacka at mail.com to : srs0=hmc8=v7=gmail.com=web123 at mail.com postsrsd changing return-path from web123 at gmail.com to srs0=hmc8=v7= gmail.com=web123 at mail.com this is no problem for me but sieve: Vacation's messages are always addressed to the Return-Path address it is possible some how change this ugly to h...

...gt; http://www.iredmail.org/forum/topic11833-iredmail-support-vo >> cation-respone-unknown-user.html >> >> >> email send : >> from : web123 at gmail.com >> to : jacka at mail.com >> >> vocation sent back >> from : jacka at mail.com >> to : srs0=hmc8=v7=gmail.com=web123 at mail.com >> >> >> >> postsrsd changing return-path from web123 at gmail.com to srs0=hmc8=v7= >> gmail.com=web123 at mail.com >> >> this is no problem for me but sieve: >> >> Vacation's messages are always address...

...l uses the Return-Path instead of the "From:" header which I had expected: Feb 27 13:22:26 mail dovecot: lda(customer)<48383><3o+yOQGBdlz/vAAAZU03Dg>: Error: sieve: msgid=<e081d2ba-21d5-c32b-3750-69fe0c8a76d2 at petermann-it.de>: failed to send vacation response to SRS0=gwGXg6ad=RC=petermann-it.de=matthias at example.com: <Sendmail program returned error> (temporary error) Are my expectations wrong or did I miss some precondition? Best regards, Matthias 1) This is the email which I use to test (I replaced the actual domain with example.com): ------>...

...the reasoning as to why > the null sender is recommended, and if you are going to use another/real > address, only use one that will never auto-respond to *anything*: Yep, those using different <> null senders should be aware, that there envelope sender rewritings, such as BATV and SRS0, that make the address unique each time by adding hashed timestamps or something like that. Those rewritings undermine the vacation database. I hope that those implementations generate an unique address per day and not per message. :-) > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3834#section-3.3 > &g...

...respone-unknown-user.html > >>> > >>> > >>> email send : > >>> from : web123 at gmail.com > >>> to : jacka at mail.com > >>> > >>> vocation sent back > >>> from : jacka at mail.com > >>> to : srs0=hmc8=v7=gmail.com=web123 at mail.com > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> postsrsd changing return-path from web123 at gmail.com to srs0=hmc8=v7= > >>> gmail.com=web123 at mail.com > >>> > >>> this is no problem for me but siev...

...; Hi i have similiar problem like here: > > http://www.iredmail.org/forum/topic11833-iredmail-support-vocation-respone-unknown-user.html > > > email send : > from : web123 at gmail.com > to : jacka at mail.com > > vocation sent back > from : jacka at mail.com > to : srs0=hmc8=v7=gmail.com=web123 at mail.com > > > > postsrsd changing return-path from web123 at gmail.com to srs0=hmc8=v7= > gmail.com=web123 at mail.com > > this is no problem for me but sieve: > > Vacation's messages are always addressed to the Return-Path address > &...

...1833-iredmail-support-vo >>> cation-respone-unknown-user.html >>> >>> >>> email send : >>> from : web123 at gmail.com >>> to : jacka at mail.com >>> >>> vocation sent back >>> from : jacka at mail.com >>> to : srs0=hmc8=v7=gmail.com=web123 at mail.com >>> >>> >>> >>> postsrsd changing return-path from web123 at gmail.com to srs0=hmc8=v7= >>> gmail.com=web123 at mail.com >>> >>> this is no problem for me but sieve: >>> >>> Vacati...

...> the "From:" header which I had expected: > > Feb 27 13:22:26 mail dovecot: > lda(customer)<48383><3o+yOQGBdlz/vAAAZU03Dg>: Error: sieve: > msgid=<e081d2ba-21d5-c32b-3750-69fe0c8a76d2 at petermann-it.de>: failed > to send vacation response to > SRS0=gwGXg6ad=RC=petermann-it.de=matthias at example.com: <Sendmail > program returned error> (temporary error) > > Are my expectations wrong or did I miss some precondition? That setting is only about the composition of the "To:" header for the outgoing vacation message (it&...

Hi i have similiar problem like here: http://www.iredmail.org/forum/topic11833-iredmail-support-vocation-respone-unknown-user.html email send : from : web123 at gmail.com to : jacka at mail.com vocation sent back from : jacka at mail.com to : srs0=hmc8=v7=gmail.com=web123 at mail.com postsrsd changing return-path from web123 at gmail.com to srs0=hmc8=v7= gmail.com=web123 at mail.com this is no problem for me but sieve: Vacation's messages are always addressed to the Return-Path address it is possible some how change this ugly to h...

...123 at gmail.com <mailto:web123 at gmail.com> > >>> to : jacka at mail.com <mailto:jacka at mail.com> > >>> > >>> vocation sent back > >>> from : jacka at mail.com <mailto:jacka at mail.com> > >>> to : srs0=hmc8=v7=gmail.com <http://gmail.com>=web123 at mail.com > <mailto:web123 at mail.com> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> postsrsd changing return-path from web123 at gmail.com > <mailto:web123 at gmail.com> to srs0...

...if they don't, then they in turn could ask their connections and so on. Anyway, since I've switch to zerotier I have no problems and so far it works great. Best Regards > > Regards, > Borg > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > > From: Anton Avramov <SRS0=TSOC=AB=lukav.com=lukav at mijnuvt.nl> > To: tinc-devel at tinc-vpn.org > Subject: SegFault when using TunnelServer=yes > Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 12:22:36 -0400 > > Hi all, > > I have a network with about ~800. The network is a mix of tinc 1.0 and > 1.1 nodes. It is gradua...

...ching for them. You noticed it yourself, you had huge amount of edges and you probably hit the limitation of tinc itself... So, in zerotier all works fine? you still have flat (mesh) network design? Or you redesigned network aswell? ---------- Original message ---------- From: Anton Avramov <SRS0=7cKF=BG=lukav.com=lukav at mijnuvt.nl> To: tinc-devel at tinc-vpn.org Subject: Re: SegFault when using TunnelServer=yes Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:35:21 -0400 Hi, thank for getting back. I'll answer the questions, but I've already gave up on tinc and switch to zerotier-one. On 2020-07-...

Would it be possible to mix the router and switch mode in the same tinc network?  I’m running tinc for a couple of years now in switch mode. It works very well. I have a dozen of vm’s connected to a couple of VM’s on 2 physical nodes. Those VM’s on the physical nodes are connected via a 2nd interface to an openvswitch bridge on which those physical nodes provide the connection outside. As extra

On Tue, 5 May 2020 13:32:50 +0100 Jonathan Plews <SRS0=286U=6T=yahoo.co.uk=pl3w5y at mijnuvt.nl> wrote: > I didn't study the internals but maybe changing DirectOnly, Forwarding > and IndirectData will have an impact on per packet performance and > speed stability by disabling some of the meshing features? I will definitely try those....

On Mon, 4 May 2020 18:45:19 +0200 (CEST) Sven-Haegar Koch <haegar at sdinet.de> wrote: > On Mon, 4 May 2020, Pallinger Péter wrote: > > > ------- TL;DR ------- > > > > Performance seems slow (around 300-400Mbit peak). > > How to improve? > > Not sure if that could be the case for you, my links are not that > fast: > > Make sure to disable

I've been very frustrated with getting XP to connect to samba. I added a machine account on Linux useradd -g workstation -d /dev/null -s /bin/false xpmachine$ then pdbedit -a -m -u xpmachine on XP i change the name to xpmachine and connect as root. I'm welcomed into my domain as expected When I reboot I cannot login because my account isn't recognized although I can login as

...myself here a lot too (1.0) but my network is very segmented. I use switch mode and handle routing myself, so mesh links arent large.. I would NOT go beyond 30 nodes for full auto-mesh.. its already like 435 edges... Regards, Borg ---------- Original message ---------- From: Anton Avramov <SRS0=TSOC=AB=lukav.com=lukav at mijnuvt.nl> To: tinc-devel at tinc-vpn.org Subject: SegFault when using TunnelServer=yes Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 12:22:36 -0400 Hi all, I have a network with about ~800. The network is a mix of tinc 1.0 and 1.1 nodes. It is gradually expanding for several years now....

Hi all, I have a network with about ~800. The network is a mix of tinc 1.0 and 1.1 nodes. It is gradually expanding for several years now. The problem is that at some point it seams the daemon can not handle the processing of the new connection and the edges. There are 3 major nodes in the system and every other node initially makes connection to one of them. Now after a lot of debugging