search for: sriram

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 90 matches for "sriram".

2013 Apr 30
3
[LLVMdev] Improving the usability of LNT
...corresponding suite. d. Next Steps: Add a Geomean button to plot the geomean of all the workloads instead of separate plots for each workload. If you feel that some of these improvements are valuable, then I can create patches and upload them in Phabricator for review. Thanks! With regards, Sriram -- Sriram Murali SSG/DPD/ECDL/DMP +1 (519) 772 - 2579 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130430/4bc62159/attachment.html>
2013 Jan 29
4
[LLVMdev] [Patch][Review Requested][Compilation Time] Avoid frequent copy of elements in LoopStrengthReduce
...rengthReduce. It is observed that the BaseRegs vector size is 4 in most cases, and elements are frequently copied when it is initialized as SmallVector<const SCEV *, 2> BaseRegs. Our benchmark results show that the compilation time performance improved by ~0.5%. Patch by Wan Xiaofei. Thanks Sriram -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130129/137e5b0b/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: loopStrengthReduce.patch Type: applicati...
2013 Sep 27
2
[LLVMdev] Trip count and Loop Vectorizer
...n. ScalarEvolution::ComputeExitLimitFromCond () { ... if (L->contains(FBB) == !CI->getZExtValue()) { } else // The backedge is never taken. return getConstant(CI->getType(), 0); } From: Nadav Rotem [mailto:nrotem at apple.com] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 1:03 PM To: Murali, Sriram Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Trip count and Loop Vectorizer Hi Sriram, Thanks for performing this analysis. The problem here, both for memcpy and the vectorizer, is that we can't predict the size of "n", even though the only use of 'n' is for the loop bo...
2013 Sep 27
2
[LLVMdev] Trip count and Loop Vectorizer
...or the loop with unknown trip count. Loop unrolling is disabled when TC > 0. Should this be changed to TC >= 0 (which does the job for this testcase)? Or is there a better way to disable loop unrolling for such trivial loops, at least the ones with known array size? Thanks for your feedback Sriram -- Sriram Murali SSG/DPD/ECDL/DMP +1 (519) 772 - 2579 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130927/da13069f/attachment.html>
2013 Sep 27
0
[LLVMdev] Trip count and Loop Vectorizer
Hi Sriram, Thanks for performing this analysis. The problem here, both for memcpy and the vectorizer, is that we can’t predict the size of “n”, even though the only use of ’n’ is for the loop bound for the alloca [4 x [8 x i32]]. If you change the unroll condition to TC >= 0 then you will disable loop u...
2013 May 02
0
[LLVMdev] Improving the usability of LNT
Wow, that sounds great! Thanks for working on this, and yes, please, send the patches! --renato On 30 April 2013 16:23, Murali, Sriram <sriram.murali at intel.com> wrote: > Hi Daniel,**** > > I made some changes to the LNT perf reporting tool to make it more user > friendly by adding some features:**** > > **1. **Make the sidebar and the navigation bar stationary, so that > it is easy to navigate...
2012 Apr 04
4
[LLVMdev] Disabling x87 instructions for a sub-target
...not have SSE enabled for my sub-target, and llvm resorts to fcomi* instructions for FP compare instructions. Is there a way to bypass the automatic optimization that generates the x87 instructions when SSE is disabled, and completely eliminate the code generation for the same(error out)? Thanks Sriram Murali +1 (519) 772-2579 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120404/7c1b74a2/attachment.html>
2013 Sep 27
0
[LLVMdev] Trip count and Loop Vectorizer
Sriram, The problem is that you want to unroll/vectorize many loops with non-constant loop count - it is a trade-off of which case you estimate as more likely. int foo(int *ptr, int n) { for ( .. i <n) ptr[i] = ... } The question is: is it more likely to have “n” such that unrolling is benefi...
2004 Feb 12
3
Ocfs mount issues
...ever it mounts the volume as root. But if I use the ocfstool for the first and mount it as oracle:dba, the subsequent mounts using the above command line mounts the volume as oracle:dba. Is there something that I am missing or I will have to only use the ocfstool for the first time. Regards Sriram -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs-users/attachments/20040212/ac6693eb/attachment.htm
2012 Apr 04
0
[LLVMdev] Disabling x87 instructions for a sub-target
Hi Sriram, I'm not sure if I understand your question correctly: Do you need to generate code that contains no x87 floating-point instructions altogether, but uses calls into a soft-float library instead? That behaviour can be enabled using the "-soft-float" flag, as far as I know. Or is it o...
2013 Jan 29
0
[LLVMdev] [Patch][Review Requested][Compilation Time] Avoid frequent copy of elements in LoopStrengthReduce
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Murali, Sriram <sriram.murali at intel.com> wrote: > Our benchmark results show that the compilation time performance improved by > ~0.5%. That's fairly small; what was the standard deviation, confidence interval, etc? -- Sean Silva
2009 Jan 21
2
CDR 0.00 duration
Hi I am using Trixbox 2.4 and PRI lines..on the CDR i see many calls that have duration of 0 seconds, but they are still shown as ANSWERED . how come its possible when duration is 0.00 ? Are the callers billed for such calls ? Rgds Sriram -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090121/3ff71beb/attachment.htm
2013 Sep 27
0
[LLVMdev] Trip count and Loop Vectorizer
...this is addressed using a simple heuristic. For that, we need to identify the loop cost and decide if it makes sense to completely unroll the loop, or partially unroll. I am unsure of the optimal way to implement this though. I want to run it by the list to get any ideas floating around :) Thanks Sriram -----Original Message----- From: Arnold Schwaighofer [mailto:aschwaighofer at apple.com] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 1:54 PM To: Murali, Sriram Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Trip count and Loop Vectorizer On Sep 27, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Arnold Schwaighofer <aschwaighof...
2013 Sep 27
2
[LLVMdev] Trip count and Loop Vectorizer
On Sep 27, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Arnold Schwaighofer <aschwaighofer at apple.com> wrote: > so you could infer that n must be smaller than 8 (because you know the range of the other dimension). The question is how often does such an example occur, where this is possible, to make such an effort justifiable? smaller equal, of course ;)
2008 Dec 19
4
Cut Through DTMF & caller ID on SIP phone
...prev. and didnt find any such problem ... 2. Is there any way to block the caller id from appearing on the SIP Phone ? my trunk is E1 PRI while i used softphones internally - i dont want my agents to see the caller id - is their any way to block caller ids from appearing on softphones ? Thanks Sriram -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20081219/9e208acb/attachment.htm
2008 Oct 10
2
Block Caller ID
...ere any way to stop Asterisk from sending Caller ID display on the softphones ? I;ve E1 PRIs and SIP extensions , i need to stop caller ID from appearing on the softphones ...but in CDRs caller Ids should show - so please dont suggest to set "blockcallerid=yes" in zapata.conf ;) Thanks Sriram -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20081010/e624431f/attachment.htm
2013 Apr 15
1
[LLVMdev] State of Loop Unrolling and Vectorization in LLVM
...r a billion times shows quite some performance difference on gcc against clang Gcc - 8.6 seconds Clang - 12.7 seconds Evidently, the addition operation can be vectorized to use addps, (clang does addss), and the loop can be unrolled for better performance. Any idea why this is happening ? Thanks Sriram -- Sriram Murali SSG/DPD/ECDL/DMP +1 (519) 772 - 2579 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130415/ff0af6dc/attachment.html>
2009 Feb 05
2
Autodialler query
...l agents who talk on certain subject - but the challenge here is that the moment he presses 1 - the customer should be billed a premium rate ex, Rs.9 per minute.. Is that possible ? If yes then can anyone guide me as to what all points i need to focus on during my discussion with operator ? Thanks Sriram -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090205/2168d219/attachment.htm
2003 Jun 17
11
Speex
Hello everyone. I am having problems getting speex support. It seems * is not loading speex. When i did a make in the codecs sub dir, the following error pops up when making speex: codec_speex.c:34:19: speex.h: No such file or directory is this file missing in the cvs as i just removed the whole * dir and did a new checkout and still seem to get this error, or do i need to get/install
2009 Apr 21
4
Asterisk Database
...- storing his number in the Asterisk DB and using Dbput and DBget ? or storing it in MySQL from the dial plan and quering it everytime to see the callers record ? how many records can AstDB handle safely ? In my case the total records wont exceed 20,000 since there are many repeat callers ? rgds Sriram -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090421/a750a86e/attachment.htm