search for: smbadmins

Hi! I am experiencing problems adding a user (e.g. smbadmin) to the "Domain Admins" group on my samba-PDC using the ldapsam backend. When I add "Domain Admins" as a supplementary group, the Windows 2000 client doesn't treat smbadmin as an admin. However, using "Domain Admins" as the primary group (including setting sambaPrimaryGroupSID as

Problem number one: ------------------- I'm running a few-hours-old CVS version of Samba 3.0 with LDAP as the authentication backend, and I'm having some problems trying to set up the LDAP accounts using "smbpasswd". I build the structure of the LDAP database by importing a couple of LDIF's, and then I import the following user account to create an administrative account

...cation can run. This does not concern me so much except for where data is concerned. I have several high priority users putting data in their Home directory so that it can be backed up on the server. I have discovered that even though these directories are not browsable, anyone who is in the smbadmins group can type //crhpdc/username in Start>Run and have full access to the person's home directory. I am stuck here as to how to fix this. [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no writable = yes admin users = @smbadmins [profiles] path =...

...e = 50 hosts allow = 127.0.0.1 172.29.56.0/255.255.252.0 ;User profiles and home directory #logon home = \\%L\%U\.profile logon drive = R: logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U logon script = %U.bat add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g smbmachines -s /bin/false -M %u domain admin group = @smbadmins cpatter sharriso ;Password Syncronization unix password sync = yes passwd program = /usr/local/bin/smbpasswd %u passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *Retype*new*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* pam password change = Yes #domain group map = /etc/samba/group.map...

...s a PDC and I?ve configured samba like I could see in this easy manual: http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=6684 (before this, I write for each pc : adduser -g "group" -d /dev/null -s /dev/null netbiosname$ > smbpasswd -a -m netbiosname ) My domain admin group is called smbadmins. I only have two kind of groups which login in the domain, scc (user domain) and smbadmins ( Domain admins). From a W2k, a user logs correctly in the domain. The doiman users can see the share directories in the pdc server, their home directory, but all smbadmins can?t log in the domain, but th...

After reading through the documentation, I realized that as a part of the migration process from Samba-2.2.X to Samba-3.0.0 I needed to convert everyone in my smbadmin group (previously domain admin group = @smbadmin) to the "Domain Admins" group w/rid=512. So, I issued the following command: [root@localhost profile]# net groupmap modify ntgroup="Domain Admins"

Hi, The group that is mapped to rid=512 cannot be used in "valid users", the users cannot map the share (error 5). Is this normal? Should I file a bug? Version 4.1.6-Ubuntu server role = classic primary domain controller smb.conf: valid users = +smbadmin command: net groupmap add ntgroup="Domain Admins" unixgroup=smbadmin rid=512 type=d As soon as I remove the group

I have an [apps] share that was intended to be read-only (to keep viruses away) however some Windows programs require rw access to specific files. I don't want to open-up everything on the share to rw, only those specific files/directories that need 'w' access. Here's the dilemma: In order for users to be able to change a file, the file and directory it's in need to have rw

Hello all, I repost this mail with a new subject line because on the original one ("Unable to join domain from WNT4") i've got no respnse. version is 3.0.23d (the same happens with 3.0.21c ) running as a PDC OS: Linux 2.6.11.4-21.14-smp, (from SuSE 9.3) on dual Opterons. After upgrading from 3.0.11 to 3.0.23d, all Windows-NT4-sp6 machines were no longer DOMAIN-members - WinXP or

...d it seems to be deleted (it disappears from the list), but when they refresh the list, it appears again. My file system is as follows ("MP3s" is the share): MP3s - mode 1775 all folders inside MP3s - mode 1777 all files inside those folders - mode 0664 all are owned by user root, group smbadmins here is my smb.conf: [global] encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd workgroup = DOMAIN netbios name = Music server string = guest account = smbguest security = user wins support = no wins server = 10.11.12.2 map to guest = bad user [MP3s] valid users = +smbadmins, fddewitt, rb...

Hi - I'm having trouble trying to get "Point'n'Print" working. I (think I?) have set it up as per the HOW-TOs but here's what happens... I login as "root" in the "MAXP" domain to the client (gservxp). I use "Network Neighbourhood" to navigate to the server (lambada). I then open up "Printers and Faxes" - just for info, the Add

I have experienced a couple of (minor) problems with Samba Thought I would report these and ask if they are known problems. 1. Problem with "!" in username map file 2. Samba tools e.g. smbstatus, testparm not accounting for "config file" parameter 1. There appears to be a problem with a minor part of username map file interpretation. When I put an exclamation mark

when trying to put a samba3 server into a domain (samba3 pdc) I always get the following error messages: [root@file samba]# net join -d 2 -U smbadmin RHEL -S server1.example.com [2004/09/30 23:36:35, 2] lib/interface.c:add_interface(79) added interface ip=192.168.0.150 bcast=192.168.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 smbadmin's password: [2004/09/30 23:36:37, 1] libads/ldap.c:ads_connect(251)

Hi! I have a problem with roaming profiles which I don't understand. I can login and logout from XP with a samba PDC with ldapsam flawlessly, but for some reasons when the profile does not belong to the user itself windows tells me upon logout that it cannot copy back some files to the server. Weird, because the directory where the profile resides is readable and writable by the user,

Hi! I'm experiencing strange performance problems after upgrading to samba 3.2.8 from 3.0.30. For all users except smbadmin (who has administrative rights), read performance is _very_ bad. Looking at the read-requests using filemon and wireshark, I found out that for those users, every read is handled transparently (unbuffered) over the net. (I.e. a 2 byte read-request of the application

When I try to logon to my windows XP box I get the following error message from windows: Windows did not load your roaming profile and is attempting to log you on with your local profile. Changes to the profile will not be copied to the server when you logoff. Windows did not load your profile because a server copy of the profile folder already exists that does not have the correct security.

Hello, On Debian 9 (stretch prerelease) I am able to mount with the following command with root using the following command: mount -t cifs //smb.physics.wisc.edu/smb /smb -osec=krb5,multiuser,username=smbadmin at PHYSICS.WISC.EDU --verbose root can also access files as expected However, when cifs-utils 6.6-5 is installed, a different user cannot access as expected: ls /smb ls: cannot

Sorry if this is a dup. I sent right before I subscribed to the list, so I'm not sure if it made it. I have just taken over a redhat system with Samba 3.0.0 configured with security = user, and domain logins enabled. I've included the smb.conf at the end of this message. I would like to upgrade to 3.0.10 for a numbers of reasons, one being security and one being that password changes

OK, I had this working a few days ago, but have evidently changed something that I cannot locate. Someone hit me with their 2x4. Samba 3.0.22, Fedora Core 4, ldapsam (OpenLDAP 2.3.24). smbd will not start, with the "ERROR: failed to setup guest info" error (I have "guest account = guest", which is a valid user with correct info in LDAP): ldap_connect_system: Binding to ldap

Hi, there appears to be a problem with a minor part of username map file interpretation. When I put an exclamation mark before a line in the file, that is supposed to stop any further mapping if a match has already been made. That's what I understand to be the case. This is not happening for me. When I connect from a Win2k machine as Administrator, the log file records the mapping from