Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "singnal".
Did you mean:
signal
2006 Nov 06
0
Re: Definity ISDN PRI
...general application. This also makes routing on the Asterisk a lot simpler.
Easy to make the changes.... will advise if desired.
Mark
> isdn-pri/line-side, protocol b, and a I think were using a TN464
> card on the definity. I'll have to check on the card. We are
> using pri_net singnaling and national is our switchtype in
> asterisk. I'll try the changes and report back. Thank you so much!
>
> -CP
>
> ________________________________________
> From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-
> users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of...
2006 Jun 17
0
T1 + E&M
...ss you can recognize there are NOT PRI T1's - but old DS1
However, when the external voice mail system begins to dial out, it grabs
the port waits for Wink, but expects dial tone afterwards - so it sits there
waiting until the time-out and gives up.
My thinking is there should be an E&M singnalling that provides dial tone. -
Any clues?
I could not find a good description of the different types and their
operation.
=====================
Zaptel.conf
# Span 1: TE4/0/1 "TE410P (PCI) Card 0 Span 1" AMI/D4 RED
span=1,0,0,d4,ami
e&m=1-24 ; <= seems like my only choice...
2006 Jun 17
0
E&M + Dial tone
...uess you can recognize there are NOT PRI T1's - but old DS1
However, when the external voice mail system begins to dial out, it grabs
the port waits for Wink, but expects dial tone afterwards - so it sits there
waiting until the time-out and gives up.
My thinking is there should be an E&M singnalling that provides dial tone. -
Any clues?
I could not find a good description of the different types and their
operation.
=====================
Zaptel.conf
# Span 1: TE4/0/1 "TE410P (PCI) Card 0 Span 1" AMI/D4 RED
span=1,0,0,d4,ami
e&m=1-24 ; <= seems like my only choice (...
2006 Nov 05
1
Definity Asterisk Caller ID Issue
You should run the 4ESS protocol ("a" on the Definity command "change DS1 board#) as the Definity may not send Display Name for the NI-2 protocol (settings "b" or "d")
Remember to make the Asterisk zapata settings consistent with the Definity.
On the Definity trunk group form Page 1, change "Codeset to send Display" to "0 (zero)", also make
2019 Jan 25
0
[klibc:update-dash] trap: Globally rename pendingsigs to pending_sig
...lobally rename pendingsigs to pending_sig
This variable does not contain "sigs" (plural).
It contains either 0 or (one) signal number of a pending signal.
For someone unfamiliar with this code, "pendingsigs" name is confusing -
it hints at being an array or bit mask of pending singnals.
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk at redhat.com>
CC: dash at vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk>
---
usr/dash/jobs.c | 4 ++--
usr/dash/miscbltin.c | 2 +-
usr/dash/trap....
2020 Mar 28
0
[klibc:update-dash] dash: trap: Globally rename pendingsigs to pending_sig
...3dab360a1e0dddcfd83c6cbfc9f720f5e233550 ]
This variable does not contain "sigs" (plural).
It contains either 0 or (one) signal number of a pending signal.
For someone unfamiliar with this code, "pendingsigs" name is confusing -
it hints at being an array or bit mask of pending singnals.
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk at redhat.com>
CC: dash at vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk>
---
usr/dash/jobs.c | 4 ++--
usr/dash/miscbltin.c | 2 +-
usr/dash/trap....
2019 Dec 14
3
USB dahdi fxo ?
On 12/14/19 11:29 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
> sean darcy <seandarcy2 at gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> There is also the ObiHai OBi202 with an OBiLine, which provides an FXO
>>> port remoted over SIP. (I am not sure if this is discontinued.)
>>
>> "FXO port remoted over SIP"?
>>
>> I have an analog phone system. I can use the obi202 to
2005 May 12
5
chan_capi, chan_misdn and chan_modem
Could someone please comment on the current state of chan_capi,
chan_misdn and chan_modem channel drivers in terms of functionality and
stability. Specifically, which channel driver would be best for a
passive PCI HFC or W6692 ISDN card. The chan_misdn wiki claims that
chan_capi distinguishes between junghanns and non-junghans cards, and
that chan_misdn is better suited for general misdn
2004 Jan 12
1
E100P - connected to Cisco
...<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
Hi,<br>
<br>
have any one sucessfully connected E100P to Cisco? I am getting
singnalling problems (channels becomes up and down)...<br>
<br>
#############<br>
Zaptel.Conf:<br>
<br>
span=2,0,0,ccs,hdb3,yellow<br>
bchan=32-46,48-62<br>
dchan=47<br>
<br>
#############<br>
Zapata.conf:<br>
<br>
callwaiting=yes<b...