search for: signficant

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 49 matches for "signficant".

Did you mean: significant
2003 Apr 30
2
make check failures (PR#2884)
R Version 1.7.0 Patched (2003-04-28), built on Solaris 2.8 with gcc 3.0.3. Obtained via rsync -rC rsync.r-project.org::r-patched R I'm not sure how signficant these difference are during development, but after an apparently successful build I got the following discrepancies in make check: make[3]: Entering directory `/export/home/ross/src/R/tests' running code in 'reg-tests-1.R' ... OK running code in 'reg-tests-2.R' ... OK comparing...
2006 Jun 11
2
Javascript include in html - load times
Hi, If I include a javascript library, will it load when the html load, or just at the first use? I have table.js and I have few pages that needs it. Should I include it just on the pages that needs it, or put it on the application_layout? Thanks, Kfir
2011 Oct 11
1
plot methods for summary of rms objects
The integration of plot methods for various outputs from rms packages is a great appreciated aspect of the rms package. I particularly like to use: plot(summary(model)) for my own purposes, but... for publication/presentation I need to modify details like variable names, or the number of signficant digits used in the figure annotations. Is there a simple way to modify the plot inputs arising from summary, or is it necessary to hack the summary object? Thanks
2014 Oct 06
2
[LLVMdev] llvm.loop metadata placement and critical edge splitting
...vm.loop loop.tail: ... br label %loop.body exit: ret If the loop tail does not have a single predecessor (complex control flow occurs after the loop test), then the metadata can still be placed on the unconditional branch. Either way, we don't need to worry about edge splitting. Only a signficant loop restructuring will invalidate the metadata. I don't think any change is necessary when clang emits a loop with an unconditional backedge, but someone will want to verify with some test cases. If a change is needed it should also be easy. With that design change we can remove any current...
2005 Jun 28
1
[OT] Memory Models and Multi/Virtual-Cores -- WAS: 4.0-> 4.1 update failing
...r should i be more specific with the question(s)? > the reason i ask is that i just dumped 2 gig dram in a basic > P4 Intel 3.0GHz box to play with. > regards and TIA, At more than 1GiB on Linux/x86, you must use a 4G+4G kernel (this is the default) to see more than 960MiB. This causes a signficant (10%+) performance hit. On more than 4GiB, it is worsened as more extensive paging is used. If you have 1GiB or less, you should rebuild with_out_ "HIGHMEM" support which is a 1G+3G kernel, and you'll see better performance (and memory will be limited to 960MiB). In a nutshell, you...
2006 Jan 08
4
scaffold uses link_to for destroy
Hi, I wonder why scaffolding uses a link_to tag for the destroy links. Seems like these should be POST requests with button_to. The Rails book dedicates pages 335-337 to this very issue. Peter
2011 Jun 22
1
Digium HA8. Does settings order matters (in system.conf) ?
Hi, I'm reading Digium HA8 manual (page 55). It lists several parameters that can be used to configure a BRI port. More precisely, it suggests that : Term, is the last parameter NT/TE is the one just before (starting from the end). If I'm not mistaken, it seems dahdi_genconf generates /etc/dahdi/system.conf files in which both parameters order is reversed : # Span 1: WCBRI/0/0
2008 Dec 14
3
Some clarificatins of anova() and summary ()
...<- lm(y ~ x1 + x2) summary(intact.lm) anova(intact.lm) the questions are 1.The function summary() is convenient since the result does not depend on the order the variables are listed in the linear model definition. It has a serious downside though which is obvious in this case. Are there any signficant variables left? 2. An anova(intact.lm) table shows how much the second variable contributes to the result in addition to the first. Is there a variable significant now?Is the second variable significant? the results i got: > summary(intact.lm) Call: lm(formula = y ~ x1 + x2) Residuals:...
2008 Dec 14
3
Some clarificatins of anova() and summary ()
...<- lm(y ~ x1 + x2) summary(intact.lm) anova(intact.lm) the questions are 1.The function summary() is convenient since the result does not depend on the order the variables are listed in the linear model definition. It has a serious downside though which is obvious in this case. Are there any signficant variables left? 2. An anova(intact.lm) table shows how much the second variable contributes to the result in addition to the first. Is there a variable significant now?Is the second variable significant? the results i got: > summary(intact.lm) Call: lm(formula = y ~ x1 + x2) Residuals:...
2010 Oct 22
1
trouble with \textless in Hmisc latex() on a drop1 object
Yes, it's homework . . . delete now if desired . . . but I think it is an interesting problem. Running R 2.11.1, LaTeX on WinXP, via Sweave. A drop1() object from a glm() produces, as part of its output, a string that looks like this: <none> The trouble I run into is that running latex() on a drop1() object from glm() produces a string that looks like this in the generated .tex
2008 Aug 20
1
Understanding output of summary(glm(...))
...1580745 0.1013207 0.1013207 0.1013207 [8] 0.1013207 0.4658736 0.4658736 0.4658736 0.4658736 0.3279128 0.3279128[15] 0.3279128 0.3279128 0.3995426 0.3995426 0.3995426 0.3995426 Can I conclude from the Pr of summary that tmp1 are of better "quality" than tmp, given that its Pr. values are signficantly smaller ? _________________________________________________________________ [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
1999 Dec 20
1
Samba performance on FreeBSD
...et quick, but writing to the server (especially many small files) was sooo sloooow. In the Samba man page I found the hint to the socket option configuration directive and read also the FreeBSD getsockopt/setsockopt(4) man page carefully. After increasing them and setting other options I noticed a signficant performance increase, that means, you cannot really compare anymore if you're writing to a local disk or to a network server during delay work. Currently I use: socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=262144 SO_RCVBUF=262144 Meanwhile, some number of people use FreeBSD and also...
2006 Jun 17
1
FYI: Araelium Edit 1.0 Public Preview 1
...d syntax definitions, user-defined "function" label extraction, and several tools for auto completing and inserting text and language constructs. The goal in developing the Araelium Edit application was to provide an a rich, Cocoa-based, OS X-specific development environment with signficant attention to user interface and functionality which was lighter and more usable than the heavy development IDEs, and yet more advanced than the simple editors currently available. The Preview release has been made available to get early feedback on the direction of the user interface, and to...
2014 Oct 07
1
[LLVMdev] llvm.loop metadata placement and critical edge splitting
...t;> ret >> >> If the loop tail does not have a single predecessor (complex control >> flow occurs after the loop test), then the metadata can still be >> placed on the unconditional branch. Either way, we don't need to >> worry about edge splitting. Only a signficant loop restructuring will >> invalidate the metadata. >> >> I don't think any change is necessary when clang emits a loop with an >> unconditional backedge, but someone will want to verify with some >> test cases. If a change is needed it should also be easy. >...
2011 Dec 28
3
Btrfs: blocked for more than 120 seconds, made worse by 3.2 rc7
Hello all: I have two machines with btrfs, that give me the "blocked for more than 120 seconds" message. After that I cannot write anything to disk, i am unable to unmount the btrfs filesystem and i can only reboot with sysrq-trigger. It always happens when i write many files with rsync over network. When i used 3.2rc6 it happened randomly on both machines after 50-500gb of writes.
2016 May 31
8
Making a 6.04
There seem to be a bunch of bug fixes in the 6.04 branch that people really need. Do we know of any current regressions? Otherwise we really ought to just push the button... -hpa
2004 Aug 06
2
A few Newbie Questions
Hi all, I apologize for the following questions - some may be more general Linux questions while others hopefully relate directly to Icecast: 1) With regards to the recent buffer-overflow exploit and the recommendation of running icecast as a non-root user, how exactly does one do that? I've changed the UID and GUID of the icecast directory and files and binaries to nobody, but what user
2018 May 31
0
mysterious rounding digits output
...ant! The change in R's source code was this one, 14 months ago : ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r72380 | maechler | 2017-03-21 11:28:13 +0100 (Tue, 21. Mar 2017) | 2 Zeilen Ge??nderte Pfade: M /trunk/src/library/base/man/options.Rd digits: + "signficant" ------------------------------------------------------------------------ and since then, the text has been ?digits?: controls the number of significant digits to print when printing numeric values. It is a suggestion only. ....... whereas what you (Ted) cite is from R 3....
2016 May 31
0
Making a 6.04
...er of syslinux 4.0.7 to boot installers on BIOS aka Legacy. Knowing that 4.0.7 has been released on 2013-07-25, and not being able to check if changes have been made since then that would deserve a release (I am only aware of a commit for ishoybrid.c) I am wondering: would a version 4.0.8 provide signficant advantages over 4.0.7? Then I would request it. I know that I could migrate to upcoming 6.0.4. but am unable to see what that brings that I can't do with 4.0.7, considering that I am not interested on EFI for syslinux: elilo is good enough for just booting an installer from an USB stick or opt...
2017 Sep 28
0
imapc and masteruser
...> > https://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2012-November/087046.html > > This is from several years ago, but I set up a separate dovecot instance on port 9993 specifically to run the shared folders as he describes, and copied his configuration suggestions pretty much verbatim. The only signficant difference is that I needed to not configure the imapc_user as he had done, and instead as the wiki suggests remove that config option entirely. With this, the imapc connection is being made from the primary instance on port 993 to the shared instance on port 9993. yes you do need to define imapc...