search for: signficance

R Version 1.7.0 Patched (2003-04-28), built on Solaris 2.8 with gcc 3.0.3. Obtained via rsync -rC rsync.r-project.org::r-patched R I'm not sure how signficant these difference are during development, but after an apparently successful build I got the following discrepancies in make check: make[3]: Entering directory `/export/home/ross/src/R/tests' running code in 'reg-tests-1.R'

Hi, If I include a javascript library, will it load when the html load, or just at the first use? I have table.js and I have few pages that needs it. Should I include it just on the pages that needs it, or put it on the application_layout? Thanks, Kfir

The integration of plot methods for various outputs from rms packages is a great appreciated aspect of the rms package. I particularly like to use: plot(summary(model)) for my own purposes, but... for publication/presentation I need to modify details like variable names, or the number of signficant digits used in the figure annotations. Is there a simple way to modify the plot inputs

While reviewing a fix for maintaining loop metadata (http://reviews.llvm.org/D5539) I noticed that we make a strict assumption about the metadata being attached to the branch that is an immediate predecessor of the loop header. This does not work well with LLVM's approach of lazy critical edge splitting. I've proposed working around this with heroics inside the critical edges splitting

From: Robert Hanson <roberth at abbacomm.net> > or should i be more specific with the question(s)? > the reason i ask is that i just dumped 2 gig dram in a basic > P4 Intel 3.0GHz box to play with. > regards and TIA, At more than 1GiB on Linux/x86, you must use a 4G+4G kernel (this is the default) to see more than 960MiB. This causes a signficant (10%+) performance hit. On

Hi, I wonder why scaffolding uses a link_to tag for the destroy links. Seems like these should be POST requests with button_to. The Rails book dedicates pages 335-337 to this very issue. Peter

Hi, I'm reading Digium HA8 manual (page 55). It lists several parameters that can be used to configure a BRI port. More precisely, it suggests that : Term, is the last parameter NT/TE is the one just before (starting from the end). If I'm not mistaken, it seems dahdi_genconf generates /etc/dahdi/system.conf files in which both parameters order is reversed : # Span 1: WCBRI/0/0

I have two assignment problems... I have written this small code for regression with two regressors . n <- 50 x1 <- runif(n,1,10) x2 <- x1 + rnorm(n,0,0.5) plot(x1,x2) # x1 and x2 strongly correlated cor(x1,x2) y <- 3 + 0.5*x1 + 1.1*x2 + rnorm(n,0,2) intact.lm <- lm(y ~ x1 + x2) summary(intact.lm) anova(intact.lm) the questions are 1.The function summary() is convenient since

I have two assignment problems... I have written this small code for regression with two regressors . n <- 50 x1 <- runif(n,1,10) x2 <- x1 + rnorm(n,0,0.5) plot(x1,x2) # x1 and x2 strongly correlated cor(x1,x2) y <- 3 + 0.5*x1 + 1.1*x2 + rnorm(n,0,2) intact.lm <- lm(y ~ x1 + x2) summary(intact.lm) anova(intact.lm) the questions are 1.The function summary() is convenient since

...ot;freshwater","marine") model1 <- glm(country~freshwater+marine, family="binomial", data=salmon) summary(model1) model1r <- round(drop1(model1),3) @ Here is some problem code. <<problemcode, results=tex>>= latex(model1r, file="", caption="signficance of individual predictors") @ \end{document} [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Simple example of 5 groups of 4 replicates. >set.seed(5) >tmp <- rnorm(20) >gp <- as.factor(rep(1:5,each=4)) >summary(glm(tmp ~ -1 + gp, data=data.frame(tmp, gp)))$coefficients Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)gp1 -0.1604613084 0.4899868 -0.3274809061 0.7478301gp2 0.0002487984 0.4899868 0.0005077655 0.9996016gp3 0.0695463698 0.4899868

Dear Samba team & other readers, I'm a satisfied user using Samba as a file server for Windows based networks and I'm primarily using FreeBSD for this purpose. When I started to use Samba about half a year ago, I was upset about the lousy performance but tried my best to search for that problem at myself. The machine at this time as a Pentium/200 PC with some SCSI harddisks and 64

From: Seth Willits <seth@freaksw.com> Date: Sat 17 Jun 2006 01:57:52 GMT+02:00 To: Multiple recipients of RealBasic-OffTopic <rbofftopic@starionhost.net> Subject: [ANN] Araelium Edit 1.0 Public Preview 1 Reply-To: rbofftopic@starionhost.net This is what I''ve been doing for a long long time. ---------------------------- Araelium Edit Public Preview Now Available

I'm happy with any representation that works for optimizer. I can prepare a patch for clang to update the 'omp simd' and 'clang loop' CodeGen. We do not use LoopInfo in front-end, but it's no problem to go to the block's single predecessor and attach the metadata there. Regards, Alexander -----Original Message----- From: Tobias Grosser [mailto:tobias at grosser.es]

Hello all: I have two machines with btrfs, that give me the "blocked for more than 120 seconds" message. After that I cannot write anything to disk, i am unable to unmount the btrfs filesystem and i can only reboot with sysrq-trigger. It always happens when i write many files with rsync over network. When i used 3.2rc6 it happened randomly on both machines after 50-500gb of writes.

There seem to be a bunch of bug fixes in the 6.04 branch that people really need. Do we know of any current regressions? Otherwise we really ought to just push the button... -hpa

Hi all, I apologize for the following questions - some may be more general Linux questions while others hopefully relate directly to Icecast: 1) With regards to the recent buffer-overflow exploit and the recommendation of running icecast as a non-root user, how exactly does one do that? I've changed the UID and GUID of the icecast directory and files and binaries to nobody, but what user

>>>>> Ted Harding >>>>> on Thu, 31 May 2018 07:10:32 +0100 writes: > Well pointed out, Jim! > It is infortunate that the documentation for options(digits=...) > does not mention that these are *significant digits* > and not *decimal places* (which is what Joshua seems to want): Since R 3.4.0 the help on ?options *does* say

On 01/06/2016 00:28, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux wrote: > There seem to be a bunch of bug fixes in the 6.04 branch that people > really need. Do we know of any current regressions? Otherwise we > really ought to just push the button... I am a user of syslinux 4.0.7 to boot installers on BIOS aka Legacy. Knowing that 4.0.7 has been released on 2013-07-25, and not being able to check if

> On 28 Sep 2017, at 20.50, Computerisms Corporation <bob at computerisms.ca> wrote: > > Hi, > > My end goal is to set up shared mailboxes on a cluster as per: > > https://wiki.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes/ClusterSetup > > I was having very little luck with it, so I had been trying to break down into pieces and get individual components working. So I have