search for: sceptics

Hi there. I have a short .ogg with Vorbis stream @56kbps from a 44.1 16bits stereo sample, which weights exactly 135'781 bytes. Packed to ZIP, it goes down to 109'485 bytes, that's a 80% ratio ! Even worse with latest RAR3 archive, with which the file size goes to 104'349 (76%). <sceptical> I admit this sample is a bit repetitive, but I guess the probability of having the

I've searched on CRAN for axes, axis, and other terms I've already forgotten, without (re)discovering the reason for S using "non-joining" axes by default, instead of box("l"). MASS points me towards Cleveland (1993) but I don't have ready access to this any more. Could someone give me a one-liner to justify this choice to a sceptic? It's something to do

Hello llvm-dev, On a recent code review I was asked to auto-generate assertion checks for my unit test. I wasn't aware that this was even possible. I am referring to the python `update` scripts under `utils` directory. My first reaction was wow! I found it very practical and useful. It saves you significant amount of time when writing a regression test. So I gave it a try. The generated

Everybody, In my case I used a RPi as an additional DC for a month or so while making some Samba4 AD improvements to the main DC's. My main DC's run on some nanopc Intel J1800 (cpu) based fanless (about 5" x 5" x 2") box's that by spec sheet draws a maximum of 15W to run on full load. As a DC they never run on full load. These boxes are actually designed to be run 24/7

This patch adds new SSE code: it's simpler but not faster so this new version is disabled by default. Maybe it will be faster on newer CPUs though... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: predictor_intrin.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 5165 bytes Desc: not available Url :

Dear List I am looking for a script that will calculate the Box M test to test the homogeneity of the variance/covariance matrix between two matrices. If anyone could send me the script I would appreciate it. I am aware of the scepticism about this test, where due to extreme sensitivity a p value of 0.01 is recommended. Despite this however Box's M test is the established

Hey list, Does anything exist that can show me which lines are explicitly tested? RCov is great, but it doesn''t really give a sense of _actual_ coverage, indeed, there is no guarantee that functions executed were in fact called as the result of a line being tested. I know nothing of the rspec internals, but would a simple list of executed lines be a relatively simple feature to add?

Readers of this list might be interested in the following article in the New York Times and might find amusing the notion that "Some people familiar with R describe it as a supercharged version of Microsoft's Excel spreadsheet software...". http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/07/technology/business-computing/07progra m.html?_r=1&ref=technology Art

I had the same issue with 4.5.1 vanilla. I was able to reverse the fixes from 11520 against 4.5.1. You can see the resulting patch here: http://pastebin.com/4wTQdLKL. A 4.5.1 build with that patch applied is working fine for me. Thanks, Arthur This e-mail and any attachments may contain CONFIDENTIAL information, including PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION. If you are not the intended

Hi, I found a link: http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/xen-smartio.hg for Xen-IB source codes, but it did''t exist anymore. Are there other ways to get the Xen-IB source codes? Thanks. Regards, Yi-Man _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

On 30 April 2014 07:50, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > In general, I see such changes as a second step. First, we want to have a > system in place that allows us to reliably detect if a benchmark is noisy or > not, second we want to increase the number of benchmarks that are not noisy > and where we can use the results. I personally use the test-suite for

Am Montag, den 12.05.2008, 10:48 -0700 schrieb Chris Lattner: > On May 12, 2008, at 10:19 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > > > > > Am Montag, den 12.05.2008, 09:08 -0700 schrieb Devang Patel: > >> On May 12, 2008, at 2:59 AM, Pertti Kellomäki wrote: > >> > >>> 2) What is the relative performance of code generated by LLVM > >>> and gcc

I have the following error message in my /var/log/spamd spf: lookup failed: available_nameservers: No DNS servers available! Having Googled the error message I've found a number of responses which involve patching Perl or Spamassassin or other cures. Before I start changing things I was wondering if there was a Centos 7 specific resolution. Where possible, on production machines I prefer

Hi everyone, after attempting to correct Ivo's statement about Theora and Vorbis being the "default codecs" in the HTML 5 draft, I just got the following mail off list: "Why are you still here? And by here I mean the Xiph lists. I've seen you speaking ill of our formats and of free software more than in one occasion. So, for what purpose do you still stick around? What

On Thu, March 13, 2014 15:32, Kevin Larsen wrote: >> On 13/3/14 6:27 pm, Eric Wieling wrote: >> > This is an example of why I top post. Who wrote what? >> +1-1 = 0 I do not care about where people put their replies so long as I can figure out who is answering what. What I do not like to read is this interminable religious dogma about the 'natural' order of

[ adding relevant cc's ] On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Julien-externe BLACHE wrote: > Hi, > > Attached is a second patch for ipconfig, which further improves (actually, > restores) ipconfig's behaviour on busy LANs with UDP noise. > > Commit 4efbcf90f60e27febe883ef052454d8cfded5c15 really is the root of all > evil, it badly broke ipconfig by doing a lot of changes all

On 4 May 2018 at 10:25, Alexandros Lamprineas via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello llvm-dev, > > > On a recent code review I was asked to auto-generate assertion checks for my > unit test. I wasn't aware that this was even possible. I am referring to the > python `update` scripts under `utils` directory. My first reaction was wow! > I found it

i had such problems on my mini-ITX. when sharing irq's with video or sound card, network traffic during ogg playing (for example on nfs) or quick moving windows crashed the interface. ifconfig down/up resolved the problem. it has been solved for a while now (i couldn't reproduce this problem) i think. regards, OLivier Le Jeudi 12 D?cembre 2002 03:45, The Anarcat a ?crit : >

Yep - all about balance. The main risk are tests that overfit (golden files being the worst case - checking that the entire output matches /exactly/ - this is what FileCheck is intended to help avoid) and maintainability. In the case of the autogenerated FileCheck lines I've seen so far - they seem like they still walk a fairly good line of checking exactly what's intended. Though I

Hi Matt, All, Thanks for looking into this and your suggestions. I compiled the program with -O3 optimization level (clang -O3) on X86_64 target. After your suggestion, i ran the program with iteration of 10000 runs and found that average runtimes are (attaching data collected as well) Forward loop traverse : 2.006 milli seconds Reverse loop traverse : 1.531 milli seconds Yes, i agree that