search for: saso

...writes really quickly, which in turn starves me on IOPS and results in a huge load spike. Judging on load numbers up to around 80 concurrent clients, I suspect I could go up to 150 concurrent clients on this pool, but because of this spike I top out at around 95-100 concurrent clients. Regards, -- Saso

...it worries me about putting this kind of machine into production use. Could some ZFS guru please tell me what''s going on in segkmem_zio_free? When I disable the writers to the /content filesystem, this issue goes away, so it has obviously something to do with disk IO. Thanks! Cheers, -- Saso

...have restored samba4 private subdir from before the upgrade and the fields are correctly set and can be changed normally. I've tried downgrading to 4.4.0 to see if it's caused by badlock fixes, but I experienced the same problem. Can I do anything to help diagnosing the problem? Regards, Saso

Hello, Has anyone out there been able to qualify the Proliant DL360 G7 for your Solaris/OI/Nexenta environments? Any pros/cons/gotchas (vs. previous generation HP servers) would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance! -Anh

I''m trying to configure a DELL R720 (not a pleasant experience) which has an H710p card fitted. The H710p definitely doesn''t support JBOD, but the H310 looks like it might (the data sheet mentions non-RAID). Has anyone used one with ZFS? Thanks, -- Ian.

While I understand everything at Oracle is "top secret" these days. Does anyone have any insight into a next-gen X4500 / X4540? Does some other Oracle / Sun partner make a comparable system that is fully supported by Oracle / Sun? http://www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-storage/servers/previous-products/index.html What do X4500 / X4540 owners use if they''d like more

Hi. I have a spare off the shelf consumer PC and was thinking about loading Solaris on it for a development box since I use Studio @work and like it better than gcc. I was thinking maybe it isn''t so smart to use ZFS since it has only one drive. If ZFS detects something bad it might kernel panic and lose the whole system right? I realize UFS /might/ be ignorant of any corruption but it

Hi all, I''m not sure if the problem is with FreeBSD or ZFS or both so I cross-post (I known it''s bad). Well I''ve server running FreeBSD 9.0 with (don''t count / on differents disks) zfs pool with 36 disk. The performance is very very good on the server. I''ve one NFS client running FreeBSD 8.3 and the performance over NFS is very good : For example

Hello Sa?o! I found you here: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2012-May/051546.html "How about reflashing LSI firmware to the card? I read on Dell''s spec sheets that the card runs an LSISAS2008 chip, so chances are that standard LSI firmware will work on it. I can send you all the required bits to do the reflash, if you like." I got Dell Perc H310 controller

...ly pivoted Successfully pivoted Successfully pivoted Successfully pivoted + Time blockcommit end : 2019-06-18 23:09:16 + Snapshot delete ... Domain snapshot somedomain.com.ncloud-SNAPSHOT deleted Done! + Delete snapshot files ... Done! + Time compress start : 2019-06-18 23:09:17 Regards, saso

Hi, I have an existing OVS bridge, that I can see in ovs-vsctl and use for other purposes. I've edited the machine's XML as instructed in http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/howto/libvirt/ When I try to start the VM, i get error: Cannot get interface MTU on 'ovsbr': No such device Any ideas? (Note: I can't see the ovs switch in brctl show or any other regular kernel tool,

Hi, I''ve ordered a new server with: - 4x600GB Toshiba 10K SAS2 Disks - 2x100GB OCZ DENEVA 2R SYNC eMLC SATA (no expander so I hope no SAS/ SATA problems). Specs: http://www.oczenterprise.com/ssd-products/deneva-2-r-sata-6g-2.5-emlc.html I want to use the 2 OCZ SSDs as mirrored intent log devices, but as the intent log needs quite a small amount of the disks (10GB?), I was wondering

As a napp-it user who recently needs to upgrade from NexentaCore I recently saw "preferred for OpenIndiana live but running under Illumian, NexentaCore and Solaris 11 (Express)" as a system recommendation for napp-it. I wonder about the future of OpenIndiana and Illumian, which fork is likely to see the most continued development, in your opinion? Thanks.

So, I hear, in a couple weeks'' time, opensolaris.org is shutting down. What does that mean for this mailing list? Should we all be moving over to something at illumos or something? I''m going to encourage somebody in an official capacity at opensolaris to respond... I''m going to discourage unofficial responses, like, illumos enthusiasts etc simply trying to get people

...ly pivoted Successfully pivoted Successfully pivoted Successfully pivoted + Time blockcommit end : 2019-06-18 23:09:16 + Snapshot delete ... Domain snapshot somedomain.com.ncloud-SNAPSHOT deleted Done! + Delete snapshot files ... Done! + Time compress start : 2019-06-18 23:09:17 Regards, saso

...not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. */ + /* * Copyright 2010 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. * Use is subject to license terms. */ /* + * Copyright (c) 2012 by Delphix. All rights reserved. + * Copyright (c) 2013 by Saso Kiselkov. All rights reserved. + */ + +/* * The zfs plug-in routines for GRUB are: * * zfs_mount() - locates a valid uberblock of the root pool and reads @@ -69,7 +75,18 @@ decomp_entry_t decomp_table[ZIO_COMPRESS {"on", lzjb_decompress}, /* ZIO_COMPRESS_ON */ {"off",...

Hello, There is a feature of zfs (autoexpand, or zpool online -e ) that it can consume the increased LUN immediately and increase the zpool size. That would be a very useful ( vital ) feature in enterprise environment. Though when I tried to use it, it did not work. LUN expanded and visible in format, but zpool did not increase. I found a bug SUNBUG:6430818 (Solaris Does Not Automatically

Hi! My name is Markus and I living in germany. I''m new to this list and I have a simple question related to zfs. My favorite operating system is FreeBSD and I''m very happy to use zfs on them. It''s possible to enhance the properties in the current source tree with an entry like "protected"? I find it seems not to be difficult but I''m not an

Morning all... I have a Dedicated server in a data center in Germany, and it has 2 3TB drives, but only software RAID. I have got them to install VMWare ESXi and so far everything is going ok... I have the 2 drives as standard data stores... But i am paranoid... So, i installed Nexenta as a VM, gave it a small disk to boot off and 2 1Tb disks on separate physical drives... I have created a