search for: rv2

Dear R users I have run an regression and want to extract the p value of the F statistics, but I can find a way to do that. x<-summary(lm(log(RV2)~log(IV.m),data=b)) Call: lm(formula = log(RV2) ~ log(IV.m), data = b[[11]]) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -0.26511 -0.09718 -0.01326 0.11095 0.29777 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) -0.3059 0.1917 -1.595 0.1...

...ich should be removed at the end of each iteration. To do this, I wrote a function to clean up the workspace. An example is included here: cleanUpWorkspace<-function() { #Remove key data sructures, if they have been declared: delList<-list() for(varname in c("rv1","rv2", "rv3", "rv4")) { if(exists(varname)) { delList<-append(delList, varname) } } if(length(delList)>0) { rm(list=delList, pos=-1) #rm(list=delList, envir=parent.env(environment())) #rm(list=delList, envir=globa...

On 07/29/2013 06:28 AM, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jul, at 09:49:28AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> Hmm... this might constrain the heap excessively if the SMT_TERMINAL >> cutoff is at the wrong place (because there will be just enough SMT_FREE >> to fit.) I'm wondering if we shouldn't use the highest of these two >> regions. > > Could you give an

hi, either function call in this code makes llc (targeting SPU) assert: declare i8 @return_i8() declare i16 @return_i16() define void @testfunc() { %rv1 = call i8 @return_i8() %rv2 = call i16 @return_i16() ret void } Attached is a patch to fix it, and remove some related redundant code. Does this rather trivial fix warrant a test case? kalle -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: spu_call_i8_i16.patch Type: text/x-patch Size:...

Hello, I'm seeing a miscompilation from the following code: declare <4 x float>* @getPtr() define <4 x float> @func() { %rv1 = call <4 x float>* @getPtr() %rv2 = call <4 x float>* @getPtr() %rv3 = load <4 x float>* %rv1 ret <4 x float> %rv3 } The load ends up loading from the pointer returned by the 2nd function call. I traced down the problem to calling the SelectionDAGISel::SelectCodeCommon on the load instruction. Before calling t...

...const int lc_string_table[7] = { + LC_ALL, + LC_CTYPE, + LC_NUMERIC, + LC_TIME, + LC_COLLATE, + LC_MONETARY, + LC_MESSAGES +}; + +#define Val_none (Val_int (0)) + +value +virt_builder_setlocale (value val_category, value val_name) +{ + CAMLparam2 (val_category, val_name); + CAMLlocal2 (rv, rv2); + char *ret, *locstring; + int category; + + category = lc_string_table[Int_val (val_category)]; + locstring = val_name == Val_none ? NULL : String_val (Field (val_name, 0)); + ret = setlocale (category, locstring); + if (ret) { + rv2 = caml_copy_string (ret); + rv = caml_alloc (1, 0)...

Hi Xiantao, Some more nit-picking, though some of this is a bit more important to fixup. Cheers, Jes > +typedef struct thash_data { Urgh! argh! Please avoid typedefs unless you really need them, see Chapter 5 of Documentation/CodingStyle for details. > diff --git a/include/asm-ia64/kvm_host.h b/include/asm-ia64/kvm_host.h > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..522bde0 > ---

Hi Xiantao, Some more nit-picking, though some of this is a bit more important to fixup. Cheers, Jes > +typedef struct thash_data { Urgh! argh! Please avoid typedefs unless you really need them, see Chapter 5 of Documentation/CodingStyle for details. > diff --git a/include/asm-ia64/kvm_host.h b/include/asm-ia64/kvm_host.h > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..522bde0 > ---

...or type, see documentation.") } if( sum(data<0) != 0 ){ #If it are returns as input # Get the daily RMs (in a non-robust and robust way) RV1 = match.fun( RVest[1]); RM1 = apply.daily( data, RV1 ); # save dates: alldates = index(RM1) if( nest == 2 ){ RV2 = match.fun( RVest[2]); RM2 = apply.daily( data, RV2 ); } } if( sum(data<0) == 0 ){ #The input is most likely already realized measures dimdata = dim(data)[2]; alldates = index(data); RM1 = data[,1]; if( dimdata > 1 ){ RM2 = data[,2]; } if( type != "H...

...ia.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hello, > I'm seeing a miscompilation from the following code: > > declare <4 x float>* @getPtr() > define <4 x float> @func() { > %rv1 = call <4 x float>* @getPtr() > %rv2 = call <4 x float>* @getPtr() > %rv3 = load <4 x float>* %rv1 > ret <4 x float> %rv3 > } > > The load ends up loading from the pointer returned by the 2nd function > call. > I traced down the problem to calling the > SelectionDAGISel::SelectCo...

Hello everyone, 9.0.0-rc2 was tagged yesterday from the release_90 branch at r368683. In the Git monorepo it's available as the llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2 tag. Source code and docs are available at https://prereleases.llvm.org/9.0.0/#rc2 Binaries will be added as they become available. The tag went in roughly one week behind schedule (see "Upcoming Releases" at https://llvm.org), but

...t;%ytq1_q2cEov0~4n at 8}kyHA$g1|QyHGFB}q=Dt6ap5|F11Od3%5)@A`+tX<!|X0s zag-E6TEHL&;DHA&0lu7>_uub%Q(F)xuG#5}2cI+A`8Nx`CeBipmzQ~A?IcN(Fc?0E zcwQ0}5u-a#SX4cJ|A#kt<MJi)Jg3|3Hm~E#QZu;|YYG;?S9=G1w0Xy|ZceV?c}}hC z>xCvSnq?Vr95X)L#~cJ4s6CP-V?lewUW~CBMi!)LNsc8iCn(=R?TsHW=ovQC7 at MXH z20d0*Rv2{pXstN+(#u at FaGB4xxA@QE7S@;i^1^uz$6q;M!(qtCQ*^uC1``$pLF4TF z=+d at l!U3u%Q9=uHTky%<e>&Zy30xXXYn0aL1w-H)q?8SWH?sw4ZZSoGMPQQ>)9IoL z4blV8Fo{F*GNH&)@+c?e0MGN-cyY}o$32ZL3bHgt2+8}mZn3nq#BYE18<Oa31scq- z6UV at r;F_TisySHu`}-^{EioKUTN!6>CrW`rBLr-1ZE^43Js0;$Ne~1CfuY}ZK!>c` z#n;*u...

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking