> On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 01:23:32AM -0700, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: >> 4) Compile llvm-gcc4 and llvm from source. Run 'make check' and do a 'make >> ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 TEST=nightly report' in llvm-test. >> >> It would also be helpful for someone to compile/test with objdir != srcdir. > > This is on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE, on i386. > Both llvm and llvm-gcc were compiled with objdir != srcdir. > Release, not Debug build of LLVM. > > http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm-2.0-make-check.txt > http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm-2.0-report.nightly.txtThank you so much for testing the release!! I've checked out the nightly test report and it looks like there is potentially one regression. SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.expandfft However, I need you to look at your /proc/cpuinfo (or whatever it is on FreeBSD) to tell me what flavors of sse you have (mmx, sse1, sse2, etc). Thanks, Tanya> > --Emil > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 10:11:51PM -0700, Tanya M. Lattner wrote:> > On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 01:23:32AM -0700, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > >> 4) Compile llvm-gcc4 and llvm from source. Run 'make check' and do a 'make > >> ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 TEST=nightly report' in llvm-test. > >> > >> It would also be helpful for someone to compile/test with objdir != srcdir. > > > > This is on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE, on i386. > > Both llvm and llvm-gcc were compiled with objdir != srcdir. > > Release, not Debug build of LLVM. > > > > http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm-2.0-make-check.txt > > http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm-2.0-report.nightly.txt > > Thank you so much for testing the release!!You're welcome!> I've checked out the nightly test report and it looks like there is > potentially one regression. > SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.expandfft > > However, I need you to look at your /proc/cpuinfo (or whatever it is > on FreeBSD) to tell me what flavors of sse you have (mmx, sse1, sse2, > etc).dmesg says: CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz (3000.12-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf34 Stepping = 4 Features=0xbfebfbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,C MOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> Features2=0x441d<SSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,CNTX-ID,<b14>> Looks like 1, 2, _and_ 3 are supported. <b14> is xTPR (Send Task Priority Messages) --Emil
On Fri, 18 May 2007, Emil Mikulic wrote:> > CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz (3000.12-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf34 Stepping = 4 > Features=0xbfebfbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,C > MOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> > Features2=0x441d<SSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,CNTX-ID,<b14>> > > Looks like 1, 2, _and_ 3 are supported. > <b14> is xTPR (Send Task Priority Messages)Okay, this is probably some stack alignment issue or something. Can you please file a bug? This is not a 2.0 blocker, but we want to track it. Thanks! -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/