search for: rfi

...any of the has_many elements and it works fine. It is when I add the items from the has_many relationship that I get a bunch of errors. Here are the examples I am trying This works... <manual-track> <color>orange</color> <comment>This is track 3</comment> <rfi-event-id>RFI 3</rfi-event-id> <submitter>Joe</submitter> </manual-track> This doesn''t <manual-track> <color>orange</color> <comment>This is track 3</comment> <rfi-event-id>RFI 3</rfi-event-id> <submitter>...

Hi All, I tried a usual NAT setup with a Linux HVM guest. Looks straight forward approach. Unfortunately I cannot ping even domain0''s eth0 interface. Xen assigns an IP address for me to vif1.0, where 1 is the domid of my HVM guest i.e 10.0.1.128(changes are per vmid and domid). I manually attached ip address 10.0.1.2 to eth0 in HVM domainU and add default gateway to be 10.0.1.128.

Hi All, I tried a usual NAT setup with a Linux HVM guest. Looks straight forward approach. Unfortunately I cannot ping even domain0''s eth0 interface. Xen assigns an IP address for me to vif1.0, where 1 is the domid of my HVM guest i.e 10.0.1.128(changes are per vmid and domid). I manually attached ip address 10.0.1.2 to eth0 in HVM domainU and add default gateway to be 10.0.1.128.

Good morning gurus, I would like to get recommendation for monitoring temperature for cpu using Asus P5WD2 motherboard and Intel D 820. I my installation has CPU cooling system changed from Intel bulk to Zalman CNPS9500 and it works. Normal Intel cooling system is not enough and is overheating cpu quite badly. Unfortunately Zalman has to be controlled (rpms) manually and thus I would like to see

Cross posted from asterisk-biz: > > Is anyone willing to host/manage a website that people > > can simply browse that lists all current DID providers > > and their coverage areas? > It's a good idea and probably not too hard to implement, > it's just a case of deciding how far you want to go.. are > areacodes good enough? or do you need to go to NPA-NXX >

Hi, this may sound stupid, but; - I'd like to install unsupported x86/i386 smp kernel because I need some support (for eg. dual booting for r/w files for winXP) etc. I'm now using 4.3 latest smp kernel. (I've tested that x86 still runs better than x86_64 like I was told in January. Thanks for the advice.) Questions: Is there any documentation for how to install unsupported smp

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops.

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops.

Hi. I rewrote the patch according to the comments. I adopted generating in-place code because it looks the quickest way. The point Eddie wanted to discuss is how to generate code and its ABI. i.e. in-place generating v.s. direct jump v.s. indirect function call Indirect function call doesn't make sense because ivt.S is compiled multi times. And it is up to pv instances to choose in-place

Hi. I rewrote the patch according to the comments. I adopted generating in-place code because it looks the quickest way. The point Eddie wanted to discuss is how to generate code and its ABI. i.e. in-place generating v.s. direct jump v.s. indirect function call Indirect function call doesn't make sense because ivt.S is compiled multi times. And it is up to pv instances to choose in-place

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Please review and comments. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops. Currently only ia64/xen pv_ops implementation

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Please review and comments. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops. Currently only ia64/xen pv_ops implementation

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops

...12.04 LTS (Precise Pangolin) precise-server-amd64.iso OpenChange from svn co -r 3923 https://svn.openchange.org/openchange/branches/sogo SAMBA4 - Samba-4.0.0Alpha18 At the step titled "Configure DNS service" # cd /etc/bind # mkdir samba # cp /usr/local/samba/private/named.* samba/ # cp ?rfi /usr/local/samba/private/dns samba/ my named.* files are actually in "/usr/local/samba/share/setup/" (no big deal) logically I would assume my dns files would be in "/usr/local/samba/share/setup/dns" but no cookie :( Find reveals: find / -name "dns" /openchange/sogo/...

...a/arch/ia64/kernel/ivt.S +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/ivt.S @@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ ENTRY(dirty_bit) mov b0=r29 // restore b0 ;; st8 [r17]=r18 // store back updated PTE - itc.d r18 // install updated PTE + ITC_D(p0, r18, r16) // install updated PTE #endif mov pr=r31,-1 // restore pr RFI @@ -646,7 +646,7 @@ ENTRY(iaccess_bit) mov b0=r29 // restore b0 ;; st8 [r17]=r18 // store back updated PTE - itc.i r18 // install updated PTE + ITC_I(p0, r18, r16) // install updated PTE #endif /* !CONFIG_SMP */ mov pr=r31,-1 RFI @@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ ENTRY(daccess_bit) or r18...

....007.00 # make clean modules # make install # depmod -a # insmod ./src/r8101.ko # reboot After the reboot we can see that the r8101 module has been activated # dmesg | egrep -i r[0-9]{4} Finaly the slow samba share was gone ! (on 10 servers) Cordialement Emmanuel Borlet Service d?veloppement RFI Informatique Groupe Yoni 8 & 12 avenue Pierre-de-Coubertin ZI Percevali?re 38170 Seyssinet-Pariset France http://www.rfi-informatique.fr/ http://www.phebux.net/ T?l : +33 (0)4 76 84 25 84 Fax : +33 (0)4 76 84 25 85

...ou have them on different channels? > > YES, definitely.... If you have the room in the spectrum, ch1, skip2, ch3, > skip 4, ch5, etc... I've actually have mine set with two empty channels > between them as the 3rd building is a machine / fabrication shop with lots > and lots of RFI going on. So does a client laptop have to change NM setup if passing from one router to another? I wonder if one can specify a routers IP address to NM ? -- Timothy Murphy gayleard /at/ eircom.net School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin

...users might want to set it to something else. So we >> really should have a separate argument for that. Anyway, I've reported >> it to virt-install developers: >> >> https://github.com/virt-manager/virt-manager/issues/94 >> > > Hi, > > This bug is now RFI, is there anything that I can do to move it along? > I believe that virt-manager developers are swamped with some other work, so writing up patches looks like your best bet. > > Will this option be of any help if installing a VM using PXE? > Yeah, I don't think that installat...

Richard Zimmerman wrote: > I've got a 3 building network... > > Buildings 1/2 between then have 3 wireless routers all pointed to one > CentOS server. > > The 3rd building across the WAN has 3 wireless routers all into one > server... > > In my case They are for local LAN access so they are setup to pint to a > single IP/gateway address... Thanks for your