search for: retrospectives

We're doing something new now with releases, running a retrospective on what things we as a community should stop, what we should start, and what we should continue. With last week's release, here's our quick form for 3.11 https://goo.gl/forms/OkhNZDFspYqdN00g2 We'll keep this open until June 15th to give everyone time to give us feedback. Thanks! -- Amye Scavarda | amye at

Hi Amye, The form is not accessible, it says Feedback for Gluster 3.11 release The form Feedback for Gluster 3.11 release is no longer accepting responses. Try contacting the owner of the form if you think this is a mistake. Regards Rafi KC On 06/05/2017 01:25 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote: > We're doing something new now with releases, running a retrospective > on what things we as a

Want to help the Gluster community improve releases? Help us by participating in the 3.12 retrospective, available on the main gluster.org website: https://www.gluster.org/3-12-retrospectives/ I'll keep this poll open until next Friday and will post back with feedback. Thanks! -- Amye Scavarda | amye at redhat.com | Gluster Community Lead

Resolved! Try it again. - amye On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Mohammed Rafi K C <rkavunga at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Amye, > > The form is not accessible, it says > > Feedback for Gluster 3.11 release > The form Feedback for Gluster 3.11 release is no longer accepting > responses. > Try contacting the owner of the form if you think this is a mistake. > > >

useR's, I am trying to do a power calculation for a survival analysis using a logrank test and I need some help properly doing this in R. Here is the information that I know: - I have 2 groups, namely HG and LG - Retrospective analysis with subjects gathered from archival data over 20 years. No new recruitment of subjects and no estimated time to target accrual and accrual rate. - Survival

First off, congrats to everyone for getting Rails 2 released. A lot of work went into the release, and it''s good to see us reach this milestone. And now that the release dust has settled, I think it might be useful for us to have a retrospective and evaluate how the release went. I think the Ruby on Rails project has improved a lot this year, and this is another opportunity

Dear R-list members, Cynthia M. Jones wrote a paper (Fitting growth curves to retrospective size-at-age data, Fisheries Research 46(2000):123-129; abstract at http://www.elsevier.nl/gej-ng/10/19/44/70/24/37/abstract.html)where the SAS procedure MIXED, Macro NLINMIX (Littell et. al., 1996)was used to estimate the von Bertalanffy growth function parameters assuming that data from the same fish are

This is what I found useful when put samba and CUPS together. diff -ur samba-3.0.1.orig/docs/htmldocs/CUPS-printing.html samba-3.0.1/docs/htmldocs/CUPS-printing.html --- samba-3.0.1.orig/docs/htmldocs/CUPS-printing.html 2004-01-28 10:56:08.000000000 +0800 +++ samba-3.0.1/docs/htmldocs/CUPS-printing.html 2004-01-28 11:23:07.000000000 +0800 @@ -1850,7 +1850,11 @@ parameter (which tries to prepare

On 4/22/14, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Apr 22, 2014, at 7:28 AM, Gabor Greif <ggreif at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi devs, >> >> after my intentionally "playful" EuroLLVM presentation (*) I think it >> would be time to get serious about merging to ToT. But we should >> probably find out whether an optimized

Hi, Im just wondering what strategy I should use for checking out from your repo. I''ve seen posts here announcing BackrounDRb 1.0 RC 2, 1.0 but I don''t see any tags in the repo for these releases - I only see two old tags (release-0.2.0 & release-0.2.1). I''m assuming the HEAD code might be a bit unstable at times so should I use timestamps for checking

Hello R users I have a question with Kaplan-Meier Curve with respect to my research. We have done a retrospective study on fillings in the tooth and their survival in relation to the many influencing factors. We had a long follow-up time (upto 8yrs for some variables). However, we decided to stop the analysis at the 6year follow up time, so that we can have uniform follow-up time for all the

It seems to me that the plugin dependencies are not flexible enough for most plugins. The particular problem I am thinking about is animation/group and fade. They both specify RuleAfter but compiz interprets that as 'load after AND require it', there is a Require rule, but this relates to features not plugins. I would like to propose these changes and definitions, they seem more logical

Not sure, but it seems the page contains a number of out-of-date entries: Pypy => pypy.org (link stale) plus: there is no llvm backend for pypy at the moment (although LLVM backends have been attempted a number of times, all seem to have failed) Unladen Swallow => not being developed since 2011 (http://qinsb.blogspot.com/2011/03/unladen-swallow-retrospective.html) TIA, Andreas The

hi, i have been using a 64 bit desktop machine to process a whole lot of data which i have then subsequently used save() to store. i am now wanting to use this data on my laptop machine, which is a 32 bit install. i suppose that i should not be surprised that the 64 bit data files do not open on my 32 bit machine! does anyone have a smart idea as to how these data can be reformatted for 32 bits?

> -----Original Message----- > From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of > Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev > Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 1:24 PM > To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Open bug count passes 10,000 mark > > On 6/12/2017 3:18 PM, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev wrote: > > > > I have been tracking this

Hi devs, after my intentionally "playful" EuroLLVM presentation (*) I think it would be time to get serious about merging to ToT. But we should probably find out whether an optimized algorithm is desired at all. So I'd solicit comments from the code owners (Use.{h,cpp}) and anybody who is interested. For closer scrutiny, the code is here:

I presume by now that most everyone has heard that, starting later this quarter with Netscape 5.0's developers' release, the Netscape browser program and its source code will become freely redistributable. They didn't say it would be GPL'd (GNU Public License) but they said their source code would be available in the spirit of the GPL. Initially it bothered me that the

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andrew Trick" <atrick at apple.com> > To: "Sanjoy Das" <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> > Cc: "Daniel Berlin" <dberlin at dberlin.org>, "llvm-dev" > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "Joseph Tremoulet" > <jotrem at microsoft.com>, "Oscar Blumberg" >

On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 17:28, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > opaque pointers don't exist in the IR yet - the goal is to reduce the places that use non-opacity of pointer types already/today and then opacify the existing pointer type, rather than introducing an opaque pointer type & having it concurrently with non-opaque pointer types. (though in retrospect

I've got a problem that keeps popping up with my reception phone. It is a IP 650 and the receptionist - on three occassions - has accidentally hit the "Forward" softkey just before she enters the "Page All" keystrokes and then all future calls get routed as an overhead page. I will admit, the first time it happened, I was totally stumped. Why the heck did I have