Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "release_60".
Did you mean:
release_30
2018 Nov 02
2
RFC: Dealing with out of tree changes and the LLVM git monorepo
...ll -- by definition -- not touch the other
directories, such a conflict can only happen if you have merges between
upstream-svn release branches in your history. E.g., if, in your fork of
clang.git, you started working from the release_50 branch, then
(potentially after a bunch of work), merged the release_60 branch. In your
clang fork, you of course had to resolve any conflicts in clang, but would
NOT have resolved conflicts between release_50 and release_60 in "llvm" or
other subprojects. The tool can't necessarily know what to do here either.
Now, in that case, it's pretty likely t...
2019 Dec 08
2
How to generate a .ll file with functions' parameter names
...+fxsr,+mmx,+sse,+sse2,+x87"
"unsafe-fp-math"="false" "use-soft-float"="false" }
!llvm.module.flags = !{!0}
!llvm.ident = !{!1}
!0 = !{i32 1, !"wchar_size", i32 4}
!1 = !{!"clang version 6.0.1-svn334776-1~exp1~20190309042703.125
(branches/release_60)"}
Could you tell me why I don't see a and b parameters for the sum function?
Thanks
Alberto
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20191208/0d499d24/attachment.html>
2018 Jan 18
0
[Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 tagged
...e top of the file.
>
> Argh, I have missed that header. Adding <cstdlib> sounds like the right solution, can you submit a patch or directly commit to SVN if it works for you?
I added <cstdlib> to api.cpp, interface.cpp and rtl.cpp, in r322869. Hans, could you please merge it to release_60, or shall I do it?
-Dimitry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 223 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180118/b401e704/attachmen...
2018 Jan 19
3
[Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 tagged
...e.
>>
>> Argh, I have missed that header. Adding <cstdlib> sounds like the right solution, can you submit a patch or directly commit to SVN if it works for you?
>
> I added <cstdlib> to api.cpp, interface.cpp and rtl.cpp, in r322869. Hans, could you please merge it to release_60, or shall I do it?
Go ahead if you're set up, otherwise let me know and I'll do it.
2018 Jun 08
4
[RFC] Porting MachinePipeliner to AArch64+SVE
...ld P == not Q.
However, I don't think that current DFAPacketizer can represent these
situations.
References:
[1] Code Generation Schemas for Modulo Scheduled DO-loops and WHILE-loops
http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/92/HPL-92-47.pdf?jumpid=reg_R1002_USEN
Code:
The sample patch for origin/release_60 [2], which doesn't use
DFAPacketizer, can generate executable files from sample-code.c for
both AArch64 and x86_64.
[AArch64]% clang -O2 -mcpu=thunderx2t99 -mllvm -enable-pipeliner -mllvm
-pipeliner-max=100 sample-code.c
[x86_64] % clang -O2 -march=sandybridge -mllvm -enable-pipeliner...
2018 Sep 17
2
build llvm fails under win7 x64/VS2017
....vcxproj]
...
LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file
'..\..\..\lib\Debug\benchmark.lib'
[D:\projects\fun\jit_tests\llvm40\llvm40-build\utils\benchmark\src\benchmark_main.vcxproj]
i also tried to build LLVM 4 and 6 on a clean cloned version
git checkout -b release_40
git checkout -b release_60
producing the very same warnings/errors and the build breaks
in the end i've got 1 lib and 2 dlls - not what i've expected :)
any ideas?
2018 Feb 05
4
[RFC] Upstreaming PACXX (Programing Accelerators with C++)
.../ copy back the data
dc.download(c);
}
Recently, I open sourced PACXX on github [3] under the same license LLVM is currently using.
Since my PhD is now in its final stage I wanted to ask if there is interest in having such an SPMD programming model upstreamed.
PACXX is currently on par with release_60 and only requires minor modifications to Clang, e.g., a command line switch, C++ attributes, some diagnostics and metadata generation during code gen.
The PACXX-RT can be integrated into the LLVM build system and may remain a standalone project. (BTW, may I ask to add PACXX to the LLVM projects?)....
2018 Jan 18
2
[Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 tagged
Am 2018-01-18 14:55, schrieb Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev:
> On 17 Jan 2018, at 18:53, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
> <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> Start your engines; 6.0.0-rc1 was just tagged.
>>
>> I know there are still open blockers and it's early in the process in
>> a way, but I'd like to find out where we are. Please run the
2018 Feb 05
0
[RFC] Upstreaming PACXX (Programing Accelerators with C++)
...PACXX:
>
> ...
>
> Recently, I open sourced PACXX on github [3] under the same license LLVM is currently using.
> Since my PhD is now in its final stage I wanted to ask if there is interest in having such an SPMD programming model upstreamed.
> PACXX is currently on par with release_60 and only requires minor modifications to Clang, e.g., a command line switch, C++ attributes, some diagnostics and metadata generation during code gen.
> The PACXX-RT can be integrated into the LLVM build system and may remain a standalone project. (BTW, may I ask to add PACXX to the LLVM projec...
2018 Jan 20
0
[Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 tagged
...gt;>> Argh, I have missed that header. Adding <cstdlib> sounds like the right solution, can you submit a patch or directly commit to SVN if it works for you?
>>
>> I added <cstdlib> to api.cpp, interface.cpp and rtl.cpp, in r322869. Hans, could you please merge it to release_60, or shall I do it?
>
> Go ahead if you're set up, otherwise let me know and I'll do it.
Done in r323037. I have also taken the liberty of merging r322875 and r322879, in which I added a '-no-libcxxabi' option to the test-release.sh script.
-Dimitry
-------------- next par...
2018 Feb 05
1
[RFC] Upstreaming PACXX (Programing Accelerators with C++)
...t;> ...
>>
>> Recently, I open sourced PACXX on github [3] under the same license LLVM is currently using.
>> Since my PhD is now in its final stage I wanted to ask if there is interest in having such an SPMD programming model upstreamed.
>> PACXX is currently on par with release_60 and only requires minor modifications to Clang, e.g., a command line switch, C++ attributes, some diagnostics and metadata generation during code gen.
>> The PACXX-RT can be integrated into the LLVM build system and may remain a standalone project. (BTW, may I ask to add PACXX to the LLVM pro...
2018 Mar 16
0
local svn strategy for LLVM release updates
...d specific svn commands for starting with a LLVM 6.0 release and later upgrading to LLVM 7.0 below.
svnadmin create repos
svn mkdir file://`pwd`/repos/llvm
svn mkdir file://`pwd`/repos/llvm/trunk
svn mkdir file://`pwd`/repos/llvm/branches
svn export http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_60 llvm_60
svn import llvm_60 file://`pwd`/repos/llvm/trunk/llvm_60
svn copy trunk/llvm_60 file://`pwd`/repos/llvm/trunk/myproj60
//Make project changes to trunk/myproj60.
//When next llvm release is available (say llvm 7.0)
svn diff file://`pwd`/repos/llvm/trunk/llvm_60 file://`pwd`/repos/ll...
2019 Dec 08
2
How to generate a .ll file with functions' parameter names
...quot;false" "use-soft-float"="false" }
>>
>> !llvm.module.flags = !{!0}
>> !llvm.ident = !{!1}
>>
>> !0 = !{i32 1, !"wchar_size", i32 4}
>> !1 = !{!"clang version 6.0.1-svn334776-1~exp1~20190309042703.125
>> (branches/release_60)"}
>>
>> Could you tell me why I don't see a and b parameters for the sum function?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Alberto
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> https://list...
2018 Aug 03
3
[7.0.0 Release] The release branch is open; trunk is now 8.0.0
Hi Martin,
On Fri, 3 Aug 2018 at 14:10, Martin J. O'Riordan <MartinO at theheart.ie> wrote:
> $ git branch --list
> * master
> martino
By default "git branch" only lists local branches. "git branch -a"
will list all of them, including (for me) "remotes/origin/release_70".
If you just type "git checkout release_70" git will