search for: reiser4

Hi, Some questions here : 1. Is there a way to compile kernel 2.6.10 or 2.6.9-mm1 with xen 2.0? I tried both (with mkbuildtree from linux-2.6.9-xen-sparse), and both failed (on different places). My primary goal is to use reiser4 on both xen-0 and xen-U kernel, so I''m more interested in -mm kernel. 2. If I use kernel 2.4.27 (xen-U), top doesn''t show correct cpu usage percentage (idle %, nice %, and so on). It shows either 0% usage on all, or 33% usage each for irq, softirq, and iowait. Is there a way...

Hallo, we have a clinical system that generate lot of files that once written are never changed. This file consume lot of disk and tape space*, so my idea was to compress this files. The problem is that it can happen, that the users have to open this files later. Is there a VFS module for samba that show gzipped** read only files as if they were standard files ? Bye Andreas * Disks are

>>> Hi all >>> >>> Thanks to Milan I am able to get further with xen and reiser4 >>> >>> - In swap line 6 and 7 status_flags.c >>> >>> #include <linux/bio.h> >>> #include <linux/page-flags.h> >>> >>> >>> - PACKED is redefined, but the definitions are the same, so the gcc >>> warnin...

...sion. I know that it is not in the kernel, and that the current situation around Hans Reiser and Namesys might preclude this to happen altogether, but there are still many people that do use it. Including me. Thus my second question is: you plan to benchmark BtrFS against other file systems, namely Reiser4, in future development stages? This would allow people familiar with performance and space efficiency on small files of Reiser4 to see how good the BtrFS really is. Thank you for your answers. Best regards Ales Blaha _________________________________________________________________ Express you...

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/10/10/BAGERLM3RR15.DTL Link posted on Slashdot. I guess this may mean that reiser4 will never ever make it into the mainline kernel let alone RHEL/Centos

Hi, For a medium term project, I''m thinking of working on transparent compression for Btrfs. Please give any hints and comments on how we would want to go about this, the features we would like to have and some common pitfalls to avoid. Is looking at how it''s done in Reiser4, a good idea ? Can we allow the compression algorithm be configurable on a per file basis, may be using an xattr ? This, for example, would allow us to make a compromise between speed and compression ratio. Any other ideas welcome. -- Thanks, Balaji Rao -- To unsubscribe from this list: send...

Zitat von Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu>: > using dovecot 1.2.17 here with maildir, still have to see > performance issues, but yes will move to ssd soon, i will just fix > problems that are here, not things that are not a problem, the above > will kill my server, so need to have an intel i7 with 25MB L1 cache, > so far i just keep it simple Look... if you want to

I've been playing with ocfs2 in local mode, and was really suprised how fast it was. I was playing with extracting a linux distribution on my hardrive that was tar gzipped (GZIP=-1) and extracting it onto a different hard drive. This was with kernel 2.6.28. ocfs2-5m6s reiser4-4m19s reiser3-6m38 jfs-8m18s ext2-4m7s ext3-7m18s xfs-6m29s ext4m55s I noticed the delete times were very slow with ocfs2, like xfs is if you don't add the extra buffers at mount time. Also when I deleted all the files on the ocfs2 partition, I don't get all the space back. Like maybe a l...

Unfortunately it is a bit more complex, and the truth is less complementary to us than what you write. Reiser4's CPU usage has come down a lot, but it still consumes more CPU than V3. It should consume less, and Zam is currently working on making writes more CPU efficient. As soon as I get funding from somewhere and can stop worrying about money, I will do a complete code review, and CPU usage wil...

...ations and degrades performance on very large directories. The single B+ tree design in ReiserFS avoids both of these problems due to better scalability properties.[/quote] So will ext4 avoid both of these problems just like ReiserFS? Does it use a B+ tree? Or this "dancing B* tree" that Reiser4 is supposed to have? Also: I found that a newly created ext3 partition uses 128 MB whereas a new reiser3 partition uses only 32 MB. I assume that the 128 MB is the space taken for the pre-allocated inodes or such. And I now come to know that others have this problem much more serious on bigger fil...

...on concernig the meaning of this log. I have been trying to manage this annoying problem. I took following steps: 1. I've raised number of file descriptors in the linux system to 8129 - this doesn't help 2. I've moved the share from one reiserfs partition to another formatted under reiser4 filesystem. The problem occurs less than on reiserfs, but still happens. I have followig operation system on my fileserver: Slackware12 running on linux-2.6.22 Samba 3.0.27a is compiled with following options (slightly modified part of default samba.Slackbild file.) --prefix=/usr \ --bindir=/u...

Hi there, I''ve just built xen & dom0 kernel from gentoo ebuilds (bugs.gentoo.org), but my dom0 kernel crashes during boot. Any help is appreciated. Console log, grub.conf and .config are included, machine is celeron/466, 128MB of RAM. Console log: Linux version 2.6.9-xen0 (root@zirafa) (gcc version 3.3.4 20040623 (Gentoo Linux 3.3.4-r1, ssp-3.3.2-2, pie-8.7.6)) #2 Sun Nov 14

Hi, First, sorry if this isn''t the place to get this kind of help... If not, I appreciate some link , forum, where I can try get some answers... My problem: * Using btrfs + compression , flush of 60 MB/s take 4 minutes.... (on this 4 minutes they keep constatly I/O of +- 4MB/s no disks) (flush from Informix database) The enviroment : * Virtualized environment * OpenSuse 12.1 64bits,

Peter Nelson wrote: > Hans Reiser wrote: > > >Are you sure your benchmark is large enough to not fit into memory, > >particularly the first stages of it? It looks like not. reiser4 is > >much faster on tasks like untarring enough files to not fit into ram, > >but (despite your words) your results seem to show us as slower unless > >I misread them.... > > I'm pretty sure most of the benchmarking I am doing fits into ram, > particularly becau...

.... no dependencies on 3rd party databases, just add filesystem (tm). theres also a ram backend built with the Mongrel URI-classifier trie as the primitive datastructure. from these two it should be easy to extrapolate how to write a memcached/hadoop backend, or whatever is your cup of tea. ive found reiser4 works quite well.. the main inspiration behind the store design is git. the API for the store should be familiar to users of jQuery.. as with one class wrapping a DOM node, you get one class wrapping a RDF resource. the resource can be an actual file on the filesystem - eg throw a dir of jpgs off...

Hello, I''m quite interested in ZFS, like everybody else I suppose, and am about to install FBSD with ZFS. On that note, i have a different first question to start with. I personally am a Linux fanboy, and would love to see/use ZFS on linux. I assume that I can use those ZFS disks later with any os that can work/recognizes ZFS correct? e.g. I can install/setup ZFS in FBSD, and later use

I'm trying to make a boot disk with reiser4progs on it. I can't seem to find any documentation on the boot.cat file. Is this something I create or does it get generated? The documentation at http://syslinux.zytor.com/iso.php says: << To create an image, create a directory called "isolinux" (or, if you prefer, "boot...

...o *one* list only!] hi, every now and then i'm running some benchmarks on filesystems i really use...here are the results: http://nerdbynature.de/bench/prinz64/2.6.14-rc2-mm2/bonnie.html http://nerdbynature.de/bench/prinz64/2.6.14-rc2-mm2/ may it be of some help.... thanks, Christian. PS: reiser4 not included because of the recent compile error, i'll probably add this one. - -- BOFH excuse #197: I'm sorry a pentium won't do, you need an SGI to connect with us. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enig...

I am having problems with a PC running Fedora Core 1, the speed of the network connection is very slow both SMB and NFS. I have tried two 'budget' LAN cards so far but the second one I tried was even worse! Fedora is recognising the cards correctly. So I am asking if anyone has a favourite NIC that they use with Fedora that produces something like 100Mbs? Thanks for your help! Nick Gale

hello hpa, please pull the latest patches git pull git://brane.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/klibc.git maks the shortlog is maximilian attems (6): klibc-utils: add sync utility pwd.h: Add declaration of getpwuid() fstype: header inclusion guards fstype: add reiser4 support fstype: cleanup old comments toplevel .gitignore: start with a simple one and the diffstat .gitignore | 9 +++++++++ usr/include/pwd.h | 2 ++ usr/kinit/fstype/ext2_fs.h | 5 +++++ usr/kinit/fstype/ext3_fs.h | 5 +++++ usr/...