search for: regn

...of the same binary variable (in datasets of other years)like .98, . 97, with which I am not comfortable either. I suspect I did something wrong. This is part of my model: > resultt1 Logistic Regression Model lrm(formula = typemort ~ adv_binc_ratio + agem1 + regEA + regEM + regGL + regN + regNI + regNW + regS + regSW + regW + regWM + regY + repmethIO + repmethSR + no_dis_no_def + prevLO + prevOO + prevRP + owning + adv_binc_ratio * (repmethIO + repmethSR + no_dis_no_def + prevLO + prevOO + prevRP + owning) + agem1 * (repmethIO + repmethSR + no_dis_no_def + prev...

...values on the other dimensions (these conditioning value can be presented as a matrix, to deal with several cases at once). The code is below, for anyone who would like to use it. Comments will be welcome. Two auxiliary functions ".+". and ixX are defined as well as the main function MV.regn Example: U1<-rnorm(10);U2<-rnorm(10);U3<-rnorm(10); X<-cbind(U2+U3.U1+U3,U1+U2); mu<-matrix(c(0,0,0),nrow=1); S<-matrix(c(2,1,1, 1,2,1, 1,1,2),nrow=3); #Ex 1 MV.regn(S,mu,X[,1,drop=FALSE],1) #Ex 2 MV.regn(S,mu,X[c(1,3,5,7),1:2],1,2) ====================================...

By request, I've renamed lib/CodeGen/PreSelection to lib/CodeGen/PreOpts (admittedly this was my choice :-), and the corresponding archive from preselect to preopt. If you see linker errors saying preselect.o is not found, this is the reason. This shouldn't happen if you update your entire tree at once. --Vikram

...-per-sample=24 10_A.wav: WARNING: skipping unknown sub-chunk 'minf' (use --keep-foreign-metadata to keep) 10_A.wav: WARNING: skipping unknown sub-chunk 'elm1' (use --keep-foreign-metadata to keep) 10_A.wav: 100% complete, ratio=0.62410_A.wav: WARNING: skipping unknown sub-chunk 'regn' (use --keep-foreign-metadata to keep) 10_A.wav: WARNING: skipping unknown sub-chunk 'ovwf' (use --keep-foreign-metadata to keep) 10_A.wav: WARNING: skipping unknown sub-chunk 'umid' (use --keep-foreign-metadata to keep) 10_A.wav: Verify OK, wrote 168060055 bytes, ratio=0.624...

...RNING: skipping unknown sub-chunk 'minf' (use --keep- > foreign-metadata to keep) > 10_A.wav: WARNING: skipping unknown sub-chunk 'elm1' (use --keep- > foreign-metadata to keep) > 10_A.wav: 100% complete, ratio=0.62410_A.wav: WARNING: skipping > unknown sub-chunk 'regn' (use --keep-foreign-metadata to keep) > 10_A.wav: WARNING: skipping unknown sub-chunk 'ovwf' (use --keep- > foreign-metadata to keep) > 10_A.wav: WARNING: skipping unknown sub-chunk 'umid' (use --keep- > foreign-metadata to keep) > 10_A.wav: Verify OK, wrote 1680...

...otherwise return. moreover, if this were something that we could really count on acting as a noop, then we could have %reg101 = getelementptr %mystruct * %reg100, uint 0 %reg102 = getelementptr %mystruct * %reg101, uint 0 ... and so on, and not make a difference. which to me seems the same as %regn = getelementptr %mystruct * %reg100, uint 0, uint 0, ... which *ought to be* indexing deep into some array. so -- what exactly does the first indexing uint 0 do? is it safe to leave it off? do all good getelementptrs have it, so that i should assert that there is one? thanks a lot for your h...

...ing that we could really count on acting as a > noop, then we could have > > %reg101 = getelementptr %mystruct * %reg100, uint 0 > %reg102 = getelementptr %mystruct * %reg101, uint 0 > ... and so on, and not make a difference. which to me seems the same as That's true... > %regn = getelementptr %mystruct * %reg100, uint 0, uint 0, ... > which *ought to be* indexing deep into some array. Yes, unfortunately, getelementpointer is not compositional, which only adds to the confusion. :( > so -- what exactly does the first indexing uint 0 do? is it safe to leave >...

...ample=24 10_A.wav: WARNING: skipping unknown sub-chunk 'minf' (use --keep- foreign-metadata to keep) 10_A.wav: WARNING: skipping unknown sub-chunk 'elm1' (use --keep- foreign-metadata to keep) 10_A.wav: 100% complete, ratio=0.62410_A.wav: WARNING: skipping unknown sub-chunk 'regn' (use --keep-foreign-metadata to keep) 10_A.wav: WARNING: skipping unknown sub-chunk 'ovwf' (use --keep- foreign-metadata to keep) 10_A.wav: WARNING: skipping unknown sub-chunk 'umid' (use --keep- foreign-metadata to keep) 10_A.wav: Verify OK, wrote 168060055 bytes, ratio=0.62...

Good day, a quick bug while encoding speexes in speexenc. While reading a .wav in function read_samples, size can get to negative values, as long as fread is able to go forward with reading the file. This can happen with Protools-generated wavs, where they put additional information after the "data" fourcc. I created a very quick hack by adding: int tentative_read =

...ub-chunk 'minf' (use --keep- > > foreign-metadata to keep) > > 10_A.wav: WARNING: skipping unknown sub-chunk 'elm1' (use --keep- > > foreign-metadata to keep) > > 10_A.wav: 100% complete, ratio=0.62410_A.wav: WARNING: skipping > > unknown sub-chunk 'regn' (use --keep-foreign-metadata to keep) > > 10_A.wav: WARNING: skipping unknown sub-chunk 'ovwf' (use --keep- > > foreign-metadata to keep) > > 10_A.wav: WARNING: skipping unknown sub-chunk 'umid' (use --keep- > > foreign-metadata to keep) > > 10_A.w...

...use --keep- > > > foreign-metadata to keep) > > > 10_A.wav: WARNING: skipping unknown sub-chunk 'elm1' (use --keep- > > > foreign-metadata to keep) > > > 10_A.wav: 100% complete, ratio=0.62410_A.wav: WARNING: skipping > > > unknown sub-chunk 'regn' (use --keep-foreign-metadata to keep) > > > 10_A.wav: WARNING: skipping unknown sub-chunk 'ovwf' (use --keep- > > > foreign-metadata to keep) > > > 10_A.wav: WARNING: skipping unknown sub-chunk 'umid' (use --keep- > > > foreign-metadata to ke...

(I've already posted this message month ago, but nobody answered, may be it was not delivered to newsgroup?) Hello, All. I wrote an encoder-decoder based on example from OGG-Vorbis SDK. This encoder can encode a large amount of small WAV-files with equal parameters into one sound archive. Then I decode this sound archive back into large amount of small WAV-files. Theese files are

On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 05:09, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> wrote: > > My general feeling on this then is that both RVV and SV should avoid using > vscale. > > In the case of RVV, MVL is a hardware defined constant that is never > *intended* to be known by applications. There's no published detection > mechanism. Loops are supposed to be designed