search for: realiti

We've been having lost dialtone problems on one of our analog station ports. Just before rebooting this time I noticed these in our dmesg output....once the PBX comes back I'll get the times, but I can't help but think this must have something to do with it. Anyone? Do we need to have digium send us a replacement part? Ouch, part reset, quickly restoring reality (1) Power alarm

Hello everyone I'm having a little difficulty with R-2.0.0 CMD check. My field is Bayesian calibration of computer models. The problem is that I have a large collection of toy datasets, that in R-1.9.1 were specified with lines like this: x.toy <- 1:6 y.toy <- computer.model(x.toy) z.toy <- reality(x.toy) in file ./data/toys.R ; functions computer.model() and reality() are

Hello everyone I'm having a little difficulty with R-2.0.0 CMD check. My field is Bayesian calibration of computer models. The problem is that I have a large collection of toy datasets, that in R-1.9.1 were specified with lines like this: x.toy <- 1:6 y.toy <- computer.model(x.toy) z.toy <- reality(x.toy) in file ./data/toys.R ; functions computer.model() and reality() are

Hi Devs, I've been doing some deep code diving and I seem to have found a discrepancy between code comments and reality. This difference could hint at a bug or performance degradation, but I doubt it. I thought to ask to get clarification. In syslinux/core/mem/malloc.h, the comments and definition for arena_header, ARENA_PADDING and free_arena_header are: /* * This structure should be a

Hello, I have dovecot setup to pull passwords stored in plain from a database. My allowed authentication mechanisms are cram-md5 and digest-md5. Cram works but digest fails on my evolution client with and authentication failed. The server is running dovecot 0.99.14-1 on debian sarge. The user logging in is test at advanced-reality.com. Some potentially relevant portions of dovecot.conf are:

On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: > On 8 July 2015 at 06:06, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: >> Ben, >> >> Looks like the reality is that glamor is just not hooked up properly >> in the nouveau DDX. Mainly it's missing DRI2, which in turn means no >> core GL contexts, and probably lots of other

Greetings, I am rsync'ing a file approximately 30-50MB in size. The source file changes several times a day. rsync is launched on the destination host every 1-2 minutes using the following command: /usr/bin/rsync --stats --verbose --bwlimit=16 --delete -Cavz ${hostname}::grids ${localdir} Since the file only changes several times a day, most of the rsync commands do nothing. Most of the

The langref says for the 'add' instruction: Syntax: <result> = add <ty> <op1>, <op2> ; yields {ty}:result <result> = nuw add <ty> <op1>, <op2> ; yields {ty}:result <result> = nsw add <ty> <op1>, <op2> ; yields {ty}:result <result> = nuw nsw add <ty> <op1>, <op2> ;

Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe at redhat.com> writes: > - For the most common runtime cases (everything except Xen and vSMP), > vmlinux disassembly now matches what the actual runtime code looks > like. This improves debuggability and kernel developer sanity (a > precious resource). > > ... > > - It's hopefully a first step in simplifying paravirt patching by

Am 29.08.2017 um 22:52 schrieb Leroy Tennison: > The AppPreloader is doing things (and probably confusing systemd in the process) but I didn't start that, it was a part of the reboot. I looked at /etc/init.d/puppetmaster to see if something strange was being done and it was one of the simpler init scripts I've seen, uses start-stop-daemon. > > I don't have any control over

Hello all: I've been given the following data and have been asked to run a logit model using glm(). The variable, Y, is a proportion ranging from 0 to 1, X is a covariate. Without a base number of observations from which Y is computed as a proportion, I believe there is not sufficient information. If I try the model below, R seems to grumble with a complaint. glm(cbind(Y,1-Y) ~ X,

Have been experimenting with Asterisk for about 2 months now. Have developed a configuration that I feel is ready to deploy for our own in house use. Our primary motivation for considering an IP based phone solution is to provide connectivity to remote tele-workers that for all practical purposes emulates an office extension. As deployed, we will have an Asterisk server at our main office with

Is this going to do what I think it will do? ie will the output be runable on a current licensed vmware server? qemu-img convert -f raw test.img -O vmdk test.vmdk

On 29 Aug 2017 17:58, "Leroy Tennison" <leroy at datavoiceint.com> wrote: The particular issue is with puppetmaster (which admittedly takes 4 minutes to actually start, setting TimeoutStartSec=300 in it's unit file stopped the false timeout report) but I have seen it one other time (don't remember the details). systemctl status puppetmaster ? puppetmaster.service - Puppet

Hi, the following patch rearranges some checkings in bsd-cygwin-util.c to keep in sync with Cygwin versions. I moved the uname() check into it's own function so that it's easier to add further checks when necessary. Corinna Index: openbsd-compat/bsd-cygwin_util.c =================================================================== RCS file:

Kai, It is a reality, but when you look at the RHEL target audience, it's not exactly hip devs deploying Docker in the cloud. Big corps, banks and the like have a very slow development cycle and long term support is absolutely crucial, software needs to run for years on end without glitches, without interruptions, in a very predictable manner etc. For the aforementioned devs I think the best

How can I tell wich HDD to swap, when the "cat /proc/mdstat" says one HDD of the RAID1 array has died? Does the HDD's has some serial numbers, that I can see in "reality", and I can get that number from e.g.: a commands output? How could I know wich HDD to swap in e.g.: a RAID1 array? thank you -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment

Dear R gurus, As part of finding initial values for a much more complicated fit I want to fit a function of the form y ~ a + bx + cx^d to fairly "noisy" data and have hit some problems. To demonstrate the specific R-related problem, here is an idealised data set, smaller and better fitting than reality: # idealised data set aDF <- data.frame( x= c(1.80, 9.27, 6.48, 2.61, 9.86,

Ben, Looks like the reality is that glamor is just not hooked up properly in the nouveau DDX. Mainly it's missing DRI2, which in turn means no core GL contexts, and probably lots of other issues. While this could probably be fixed somehow, I doubt there's any advantage to using the nouveau DDX over something like modesetting nowadays. How would you feel about dropping glamor support from

Dear users I have a problem with the dr function: "dimension reduction". I give you my example, and i'll be pleased to read your comments. #let be X a matrix 50*100: library(dr); X<- matrix(rnorm(50*100,5,1),50,100); #and let be Y a vector response: Y<- sample(0:1,50,replace=T); #I choose (for the expérience, but in reality i don't have it) a few variables #which are