search for: raduly

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 73 matches for "raduly".

Did you mean: duly
2013 May 16
1
[LLVMdev] Test failures
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 16 May 2013 09:01, Csaba Raduly <rcsaba at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> "s390x--linux-gnu" seems wrong: either there's a dash too many or a >> word too few. > > > Nope, this triple is correct. The canonicalization of the triple (actually a > quadruple) always print all fields, empty o...
2011 Dec 08
2
[LLVMdev] Executable file size comparison
On Thursday, December 08, 2011 02:46:39 AM Csaba Raduly wrote: > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Richard Pennington wrote: > > I compiled a program and standard library using clang/LLVM and found the > > results interesting: > > > > text data bss dec hex filename > > 141312 4076 16668 162056 2...
2013 May 16
5
[LLVMdev] Test failures
Hi, Two days ago, the test suite started failing. Initially there were hundreds of failing tests; now only seven remain. They appear to be related to SystemZ. Here's the last failed test: ******************** FAIL: LLVM :: MC/Disassembler/SystemZ/unmapped.txt (11484 of 14435) ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: MC/Disassembler/SystemZ/unmapped.txt' FAILED ******************** Script:
2011 Dec 09
0
[LLVMdev] Executable file size comparison
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Richard Pennington wrote: > On Thursday, December 08, 2011 02:46:39 AM Csaba Raduly wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Richard Pennington  wrote: >> > I compiled a program and standard library using clang/LLVM and found the >> > results interesting: >> > >> >   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename >> >  141312    4...
2011 Jan 11
0
[LLVMdev] clang+LLVM fails to compile ctags
On 11.01.2011, at 12:02, Csaba Raduly wrote: > clang version 2.9 (trunk 123166) > Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu > Thread model: posix > > Fails to compile ctags 5.8 (also 5.6), specifically eiffel.c: > > $ clang -v -c e.c -O2 -Wno-unused-value > clang version 2.9 (trunk 123166) […] > bool<unnamed&gt...
2011 Jun 01
5
[LLVMdev] How to identify LLVM version?
Hi Yuri, On 31/05/11 22:29, Yuri wrote: > On 05/31/2011 12:50, Duncan Sands wrote: >> probably it's best to just go ahead and implement this (with PACKAGE_VERSION >> being auto-computed from these) and see if anyone objects : > > But this only works for C++ apps compiled with headers. > It's better to implement version to be returned through the API exported from
2011 Jun 11
1
[LLVMdev] llvm fails on MinGW-32 (Windows) because Python is not supported there
On 06/11/2011 09:32, Csaba Raduly wrote: > There are various precompiled Windows binaries for Python (yes, even > 3.2), from http://www.python.org/download/ or > http://www.activestate.com/activepython-3 > Thanks! I got msi based installer (3.2) from http://www.python.org/download/. But llvm build now fails with th...
2011 Jun 03
0
[LLVMdev] How to identify LLVM version? [updated patch]
Following the suggestions of Joachim Durchholz and Csaba Raduly, I submit the updated patch. Yuri -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: patch.txt URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110603/3ab82148/attachment.txt>
2011 Sep 22
1
[LLVMdev] ../llvm/configure fails in Cygwin with space character in path name?
Am 22.09.2011 14:31, schrieb Csaba Raduly: > GNU Make doesn't handle embedded spaces: Actually it does. It's just not pretty. See http://www.cmcrossroads.com/index2.php?option=com_content&id=7859 (Google it as "GNU Make meets file names with spaces in them", including the quotes.) Note that the more obscure tech...
2013 May 16
0
[LLVMdev] Test failures
On 16 May 2013 09:01, Csaba Raduly <rcsaba at gmail.com> wrote: > "s390x--linux-gnu" seems wrong: either there's a dash too many or a > word too few. > Nope, this triple is correct. The canonicalization of the triple (actually a quadruple) always print all fields, empty or not. I'm not sure what&...
2018 Apr 20
0
[cfe-dev] RFC: Implementing -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks in clang
On 4/20/18, James Y Knight wrote: > > > Yep. "-fnull-pointer-is-valid" has been suggested before. > -fplacate-linux-kernel-developers ? Csaba -- You can get very substantial performance improvements by not doing the right thing. - Scott Meyers, An Effective C++11/14 Sampler So if you're looking for a completely portable, 100% standards-conformat way to get the wrong
2013 May 16
0
[LLVMdev] Test failures
Csaba Raduly <rcsaba at gmail.com> wrote: > error: no disassembler for target s390x--linux-gnu The SystemZ disassembler was only recently added. To process major changes to the source tree like the addition of a completely new component, it seems to be necessary to explicitly re-run configure (or so...
2018 Apr 20
3
[cfe-dev] RFC: Implementing -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks in clang
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:54 PM Tim Northover via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Despite the name, the flag actually has rather straightforward semantics > > from the compiler's perspective. From the gcc docs for > > -fdelete-null-pointer-checks: "Assume that programs cannot safely > > dereference null pointers, and that no code or data
2011 Feb 10
0
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM on Cygwin.
Hi Anand On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Anand Arumugam wrote: > On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:40 AM, NAKAMURA Takumi wrote: >> >> Anand, >> >> >> I have not tried building llvm-gcc, though, ... >> >> Please show me "/path/to/config.status --version". > > [Anand] Here is the config.status output taken from '/cygdrive/c/llvm-2.8':
2014 Nov 18
2
[LLVMdev] Test failure
Hi, For a couple of days now, one of the tests fails: FAIL: LLVM :: MC/R600/sopp.s (16225 of 19902) ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: MC/R600/sopp.s' FAILED ******************** Script: -- /home/csabaraduly/workspace/LLVM/build/Release+Asserts/bin/llvm-mc -arch=r600 -mcpu=SI -show-encoding /home/csabaraduly/workspace/LLVM/llvm/test/MC/R600/sopp.s | /home/csabaraduly/workspace/LLVM/build/Release+Asserts/bin/FileCheck /home/csabaraduly/workspace/LLVM/llvm/test/MC/R600/sopp.s -- Exit Code: 2 Command Ou...
2019 Mar 29
2
Test failure due to file path
...inux < %s –o %t.o –g But in this case, llvm-symbolizer still prints the file as $CWD/<stdin> which seems like its own separate bug. --paulr From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Jordan Rupprecht via llvm-dev Sent: Friday, March 29, 2019 1:13 PM To: Csaba Raduly Cc: llvm-dev Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Test failure due to file path True, it could probably skip the filename printed at the beginning of readobj with something like this: #REGEX1: Symbols [#REGEX1-NOT: foobaz #REGEX1-NOT: bar #REGEX1-NOT: rebar Mind contributing a patch? :) On Fri,...
2017 Nov 28
1
Go Tsan check failure
...g llvm build, and there is no way to selectively disable each one of that. By design. In the long run we need to fix all failures (please file a proper bug). If you are looking for a temporal workaround, then comment it out. I don't what else to suggest. On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Csaba Raduly <rcsaba at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I want to build clang successfully :) I don't care about Go. > > buildgo.sh is invoked directly by ninja. I don't want to modify the > (generated) build.ninja > > The "SILENT=1" is hard-coded into build.ninja and ninj...
2011 Jan 11
2
[LLVMdev] clang+LLVM fails to compile ctags
clang version 2.9 (trunk 123166) Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Thread model: posix Fails to compile ctags 5.8 (also 5.6), specifically eiffel.c: $ clang -v -c e.c -O2 -Wno-unused-value clang version 2.9 (trunk 123166) Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Thread model: posix "/home/csaba/bin/clang" -cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -emit-obj -disable-free -main-file-name e.c
2011 Apr 20
3
[LLVMdev] Is this a bug in clang?
This code is undefined, meaning that all bets are off, don't do it. I.e. It reads the value of I between two sequence points and uses it for something other than determining the value written. From: Csaba Raduly Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 3:44 AM To: Joe Armstrong Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is this a bug in clang? Hi Joe On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Joe Armstrong <joearms at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Is this a bug in clang, or a bug in my thinking? > &...
2011 Oct 28
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
...e it more suitable for IDEs, however, from the sysop point of view, it's much more a pleasure to work with cmake than with autotools, and when you introduce (yet) another new build system, it would be just a headache :) Best regards, Christian Parpart. On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Csaba Raduly <rcsaba at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > I have a very high level comment, and you may be able to directly shed > light > > on it before I dig into a lot more detail. > > Why not simply standardize on CMake? > &gt...