search for: qlc

...216000C0FF87A646d0: configured with capacity of 272.44GB c6t216000C0FF805F5Ed0: configured with capacity of 272.44GB c6t226000C0FFA05F5Ed0: configured with capacity of 272.44GB AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: 0. c1t0d0 <SUN72G cyl 14087 alt 2 hd 24 sec 424> /pci at 9,600000/SUNW,qlc at 2/fp at 0,0/ssd at w2100000c503b5b09,0 1. c1t1d0 <SUN72G cyl 14087 alt 2 hd 24 sec 424> /pci at 9,600000/SUNW,qlc at 2/fp at 0,0/ssd at w2100000c503b783f,0 2. c6t40d0 <SUN-StorEdge3510-327P cyl 35424 alt 2 hd 127 sec 127> /pci at 8,600000/SUNW,qlc at...

...4 QSIG Reserve Erweiterung 4 QF5 QSIG Reserve Erweiterung 5 QF6 QSIG Reserve Erweiterung 6 QF7 QSIG Reserve Erweiterung 7 QF8 QSIG Reserve Erweiterung 8 QF9 QSIG Reserve Erweiterung 9 QFR QSIG in Frankreich QIS QSIG ISO QJI Anpassung QSIG f?r jistel IS QLC QSIG Leitungs Code QLCE1 QLC Erweiterung 1 QLCE2 QLC Erweiterung 2 QLCEC QLC Leitg. Code extern Rufe QLCEO QLC extern nur PABX Nummer QLCP1 QLC private Rufnr. nach Level 1 QLCP2...

Hi, I just had my Dell R610 reboot with a kernel panic when I threw a couple of zfs clone commands in the terminal at it. Now, after the system had rebooted zfs will not import my pool anylonger and instead the kernel will panic again. I have had the same symptom on my other host, for which this one is basically the backup, so this one is my last line if defense. I tried to run zdb -e

http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b114/ This URL makes me think that if I just sit down and figure out how to compile OpenSolaris, I can try b114 now^h^h^h eventually ? I am really eager to try out the new quota support.. has someone already tried compiling it perhaps? How complicated is compiling osol compared to, say, NetBSD/FreeBSD, Linux etc ? (IRIX and its quickstarting??) --

...Mode: Initiator Port ID: 10700 OS Device Name: /dev/cfg/c7 Manufacturer: QLogic Corp. Model: 375-3355-01 Firmware Version: 05.01.03 FCode/BIOS Version: BIOS: 1.24; fcode: 1.24; EFI: 1.08; Serial Number: 0402R00-0724369194 Driver Name: qlc Driver Version: 20090924-2.38 Type: N-port State: online Supported Speeds: 1Gb 2Gb 4Gb Current Speed: 4Gb Node WWN: 2000001b321fbc18 Max NPIV Ports: 127 NPIV port list: Virtual Port1: Node WWN: 210000000000000...

...on a server and the V880 cannot now mount the main root filesystem. I can boot the server into single user mode from the network. However, how can i rectify the corrupted ZFS disk ? Cheers. T. NOTICE: spa_import_rootpool: error 22 Cannot mount root on /pci at 8,600000/SUNW,qlc at 2/fp at 0,0/disk at w21000004cf6892b0,0:a fstype zfs panic[cpu2]/thread=180e000: vfs_mountroot: cannot mount root 000000000180b950 genunix:vfs_mountroot+358 (800, 200, 0, 1873c00, 189d400, 18c7400) %l0-3: 00000000010bb400 00000000010bb334 0000000001879560 00000000011e8400 %l4-7: 00...

Hi Timo, We are facing this issue on our mail server 1. Two email id's are mapped to a same account 2. If I send a mail to both the account simultaneously i get below error "Nov 21 12:13:37 blade8 dovecot: lda(kapil.gupta at qlc.in): save: box=INBOX, uid=error, msgid=<1321857820.4ec9f31ce638c at SwiftMailer.generated>, size=10921" 3. Due to this the mail is delivered only to 1 email id. 4. I am loosing all my mails. Kindly help in the same ASAP. Regards, Paresh Chalke

I have a machine with opensolaris snv111b .I want to let it use to a fc-san initiator NAS header in my total system. Now I configure FC HBA port from qlt to qlc mode as initiator wich command update_drv . I can use stmfadm list-target -v to find the FC-SAN target is conneted Target: wwn.2100001B328A3224 Operational Status: Online Provider Name : qlt Alias : qlt2,0 Protocol : Fibre Channel Sessions :...

Where can I find a list of supported multipath drivers for ZFS? Keith McAndrew Senior Systems Engineer Northern California SUN Microsystems - Data Management Group <mailto:Keith.McAndrew at SUN.com> Keith.McAndrew at SUN.com 916 715 8352 Cell CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information of SUN

We have a 32 GB RAM server running about 14 zones. There are multiple databases, application servers, web servers, and ftp servers running in the various zones. I understand that using ZFS will increase kernel memory usage, however I am a bit concerned at this point. root at servername:~/zonecfg #mdb -k Loading modules: [ unix krtld genunix specfs dtrace uppc pcplusmp ufs md mpt ip indmux ptm

...ol create rpool c1t1d0s0 Created new BE: # lucreate -c Sol11_b96 -n Sol11_b96_zfs -p rpool This ran fine, so I activated the new BE and rebooted # luactivate Sol11_b96_zfs # init 6 The system then panicked during the reboot with: Rebooting with command: boot Boot device: /pci at 8,600000/SUNW,qlc at 2/fp at 0,0/disk at w21000004cfaf121b,0:a File and args: SunOS Release 5.11 Version snv_96 64-bit Copyright 1983-2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. Use is subject to license terms. Mounting root on rpool/ROOT/Sol11_b105 with filesystem type zfs is not supported panic[cpu7]/threa...

This is with respect to an error that I am facing in dovecot. The error is that is seen in logs is "Feb 23 00:04:46 mailblade1 dovecot: IMAP(USERNAME): /indexes/USERNAME/.INBOX/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 7: 1234776125.M559298P3988.s2o.qlc.co.in,S=13111,W=13470:2, (uid 94277 -> 97805)" This error is seen for multiple users. Once this error occurs for a user, the user downloads mails all over again in POP3. Please help! And let us know what can be done. Details of our setup ---------------------- The setup has deployed 2...

How much fun can you have with a simple thing like powerpath? Here''s the story: I have a (remote) system with access to a couple of EMC LUNs. Originally, I set it up with mpxio and created a simple zpool containing the two LUNs. It''s now been reconfigured to use powerpath instead of mpxio. My problem is that I can''t import the pool. I get: pool: ###### id:

Franz Fellner <alpine.art.de at gmail.com> writes: > I also suffer from bad performance of notmuch new. I used notmuch > some years ago and notmuch new always felt instantanious. Had to stop > using it because internet was too slow to sync my mails :/ Now (with > better internet and a completely new setup using mbsync) indexing one > mail takes at least 10 seconds,

....0 0.0 3.9 0 2 c2t42d2 0.0 3.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0 1 c2t42d0 ^C bash-3.00# Not really much is happening here - looks like CPU is the limiting factor. bash-3.00# mdb -k Loading modules: [ unix krtld genunix specfs dtrace ufs sd px md ip sctp usba fcp fctl qlc crypto lofs zfs random nfs ptm ssd logindmux cpc fcip ] > ::ps!grep zpool R 17472 15928 17472 15928 0 0x4a004000 00000303b55647f8 zpool > 00000303b55647f8::walk thread|::findstack -v stack pointer for thread 307939f6fc0: 2a102d5cf41 [ 000002a102d5cf41 cv_wait+0x38() ] 000002a102d5c...

Hello ZFS, System was rebooted and after reboot server again System is snv_39, SPARC, T2000 bash-3.00# ptree 7 /lib/svc/bin/svc.startd -s 163 /sbin/sh /lib/svc/method/fs-local 254 /usr/sbin/zfs mount -a [...] bash-3.00# zfs list|wc -l 46 Using df I can see most file systems are already mounted. > ::ps!grep zfs R 254 163 7 7 0 0x4a004000

Hi Folks, I''ve got a 3.9 Tb zpool, and it is casing kernel panics on my Solaris 10 280r (SPARC) server. The message I get on panic is this: panic[cpu1]/thread=2a100a95cc0: zfs: freeing free segment (offset=423713792 size=1024) This seems to come about when the zpool is being used or being scrubbed - about twice a day at the moment. After the reboot, the scrub seems to have

...B{;iCG!HMTQoQe8GSjs*@NXg8o*Q=#1*Mo((Qc5D4ptrkvL7u# zVbTT6jP9)0eS7#7Jj4yu?<JRrF3w8k;)ZYeuHi|&*C{qICC;WP8Rrhjs;z9iL#UU2 zLT`YuE=^+Q<-Yhio6+K{gP1z&cQJDge}Mo%Q;<WG18Zo!_B~>gKjkyeW%uoT_KfN$ zS7px(pEU$$@8;ECKc(*Xld0En5FRaiVeQ+r(l=^=y!Z<o`tl7<rl{GWdYkZl8!#@E zmzg_TrPACdnzjLv1iM|V^qlc&!qkFdz5+@BJyHd=ga3vAVGjHV^lR3vne^8m!vzPE z=}_{dwUeF@QZX$<ui@n6#Fi~vd9TX=j4qWoPDx9J<56Zbo4Fkuzvg;RqbbPd!t$xa z?feNhcaioH#Teh8y>B@R3P4a9$*dfq%;VVJzVf#RfQ)n{c8$B~9m~FO2$%maS>Jyn zjM!Kup)ER;c}m>F_3b}%*sd2DhVsSkTjUzpqS5!nSI-ZZgv+w+CfZy+i|I;>ZoLQ^ zFs;g)34qGf63@;f@aXg!mp6Wc^YRwV^!&g...

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking

...%mL6QHvrmS`c;G_b=K#yREKbNAAfb+)&y;nIsmh>CO0FkmnSB5oF$H4 zkW$&aUcXNRNxy3Wl*x|%J4uY(wrBxd;=LqWWes#S5JEN|?VRaYsSALeKkk@$-R*4X zxR>@voLDoWJbnTX1Vngi19~R$z}oJ#D^5L!ezbqn_MUh1pWqvI`)>~}1HnwMeOtMi zSJ+g0z}8cW3f8#bU|kvi#_}%zcUeB~cL06_4oM<_y*l}tk(%=<rM2MkZvJG(KN|Mj zU0 at jTri1ev=}`|AdqlcE-Y$#Lk<|*-_8jXj;3y5P&L8D;Y0&QAPNJDav5=1nA#|ps z3BWC&+MJJHnDTG^FlhWGK~}qSU*<dAV-7$pB7^YTgXR+gZ!pt at CRYDFi@k at 2Lv{~% z?LUe3hb;dX3v<br&fI=IQTp2lTQ;>;dBfKfz^egJ(z=X_`>fwDk9~}Ps;NycyRpXs z=nu*P_Y5KBW+7H at H(p_uNca<4T3X!ApK$=-4m-due=IX>p0iGv%K!D7bDM{E?L_?Q z=A*Lc...