search for: llc

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8093 matches for "llc".

Did you mean: ll
2012 Nov 12
2
[LLVMdev] Incorrect values of GCC/LLC, GCC/LLC-BETA and LLC/LLC-BETA columns in the report.html
Hi, I run LLVM test suite using the following command and get report.nightly.html successfully. % make report.html TEST=nightly But GCC/LLC, GCC/LLC-BETA and LLC/LLC-BETA columns look strange. Here is for example snippet of "clamscan" test result: [[ Program MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan GCC 0.2360 LLC 0.2360 LLC-BETA * GCC/LLC...
2017 Jul 01
2
LLC Segmentation Fault in Matrix Multiplication
Hello, when i used clang for matrix multiplication code with i=j=k=1000351, it successfully generates IR. then i run opt as follows opt -S -O3 -force-vector-width=64 -force-vector-interleave=32 matn.ll -o pimmatnl_64_u32_o3.ll it also worked fine. but when i run llc on the optimized .ll file llc -x86-asm-syntax=intel pimmatnl_64_u32_o3.ll -o matnl-knl4_intel.s i get the following segmentation fault error: #0 0x0000000001826ad8 (llc+0x1826ad8) #1 0x0000000001824aae (llc+0x1824aae) #2 0x0000000001824bfc (llc+0x1824bfc) #3 0x00007fa6bdb52d10 __restore_rt (/lib...
2012 Nov 14
0
[LLVMdev] Incorrect values of GCC/LLC, GCC/LLC-BETA and LLC/LLC-BETA columns in the report.html
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Simon Atanasyan <satanasyan at mips.com> wrote: > I run LLVM test suite using the following command and get > report.nightly.html successfully. > > % make report.html TEST=nightly > > But GCC/LLC, GCC/LLC-BETA and LLC/LLC-BETA columns look strange. Here > is for example snippet of "clamscan" test result: > [[ > Program MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan > GCC 0.2360 > LLC 0.2360 > LLC-BETA...
2009 Jun 28
3
[LLVMdev] Error when running llc to compile .bc to .s
Dear staff, I downloaded an llvm version from the svn trunk at June 12, because the released 2.5 version can not support "gcc -g -Ox", and x=1,2,3. I use the version in svn to compile an httpd.bc file succefully with dbgstoppoint() functions. However, when I use llc to compile the bc file to .s file (llc -f -o httpd.s httpd.bc), I met this error (the httpd.bc file will be attached at the next email): llc: /home/heming/defens/llvm-2.5/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp:1235: void llvm::DwarfDebug::ConstructCompileUnit(llvm::GlobalVariable*): Asser...
2017 Jul 01
2
LLC Segmentation Fault in Matrix Multiplication
Can you attach your source code or .ll file? Have you tried a debug build of llc which might give a more readable stack dump or even an assertion message. ~Craig On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 10:51 PM, hameeza ahmed via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > It happens only when i keep my vector width to >=64, why is that so? > > I have to keep it >=6...
2011 May 23
2
[LLVMdev] Debug llc crash using bugpoint
Hi, What is the best way to debug an llc crash using bugpoint? I am getting the following crash that I would like to reduce llc: /home/vadve/aggarwa4/llvm29/llvm-2.9/lib/MC/MCAsmStreamer.cpp:273: virtual void<unnamed>::MCAsmStreamer::EmitLabel(llvm::MCSymbol*): Assertion `Symbol->isUndefined() && "Cannot define a s...
2010 Mar 19
2
[LLVMdev] Use of blockadress() crashes llc in some cases
Hi! In some cases the use of blockaddress() crashes llc. I've attached two test-cases, one that crashes and for reference a slightly modified one (just 2 lines are commented) that works. I compile the files with # llvm-as test_crash.ll -o - | llc -f -o temp.s - and get 0 llc 0x0000000000c6ab6f 1 llc 0x0000000000c6b3...
2007 Apr 06
3
[LLVMdev] llc assertion failure
I am running the following llvm-ld command to produce native code: llvm-ld -native -o code.exe code.bc -lm However, I am getting the following assertion failure in llc. The bytecode has been processed with opt, it passes opt bytecode verification. I'm not too familiar with backend code generation. Does anyone have any insight in to what the problem might be or how to go about debugging it? Regards, Ryan llc: /home/lefever/work/llvm-cvs-070325/includ...
2011 Jan 27
2
[LLVMdev] Question about compiling plugins for LLVM tools
When I load my plugin into opt or llc, I get a bunch of warnings: llc: CommandLine Error: Argument 'use-unknown-locations' defined more than once! llc: CommandLine Error: Argument 'disable-debug-info-print' defined more than once! llc: CommandLine Error: Argument 'print-dbgscope' defined more than once! llc: Co...
2007 Apr 06
0
[LLVMdev] llc assertion failure
Hi Ryan, On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 13:34 -0500, Ryan M. Lefever wrote: > I am running the following llvm-ld command to produce native code: > > llvm-ld -native -o code.exe code.bc -lm > > However, I am getting the following assertion failure in llc. The > bytecode has been processed with opt, it passes opt bytecode > verification. I'm not too familiar with backend code generation. Does > anyone have any insight in to what the problem might be or how to go > about debugging it? Okay, a couple things: 1. Does the llc ve...
2013 Jul 29
2
[LLVMdev] opt -O3 causes Assertion `New->getType() == getType() && "replaceAllUses of value with new value of different type!"' failed
I am hitting an LLVM assertion from the llc tool iff the bitcode file is optimized at -O3 level by opt). -O1 and -O2 levels of opt do not cause this assert. LLVM version 3.4svn DEBUG build with assertions. Built Jul 14 2013 (15:39:08). Default target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Host CPU: amdfam10 I have attached the input bc file b...
2006 Apr 13
1
[LLVMdev] standalone llvm
...Wed, 12 Apr 2006 22:48:16 -0500 Patrick Meredith <pmeredit at uiuc.edu> wrote: > > On Apr 12, 2006, at 10:23 PM, Simon Burton wrote: > > > > > Is it possible to get llvm to generate native machine code > > without using gcc and friends ? Do I use lli ? > > llc. llc --help lists all the options. it compiles llvm bytecode > files. It seems this does not yet work on X86. Are there some restrictions I could adhere to in order to get something to work ? Simon. $ llc -filetype=dynlib -f -o=helloworld.so helloworld.bc llc: target 'X86' does no...
2011 Mar 24
0
[LLVMdev] mblaze backend: unreachable executed
> what does "refuses to compile" mean? I.e. what error do you get? > Specifically I get this message when compiling with the default -mattr: Call result #2 has unhandled type i32 UNREACHABLE executed at CallingConvLower.cpp:162! 0 llc 0x0000000100a1e115 PrintStackTrace(void*) + 38 1 llc 0x0000000100a1e6d0 SignalHandler(int) + 254 2 libSystem.B.dylib 0x00007fff82adf67a _sigtramp + 26 3 llc 0x000000010053233c llvm::SmallVectorImpl<unsigned int>::push_back(unsigned int const&)...
2017 Jul 01
0
LLC Segmentation Fault in Matrix Multiplication
Files are attached here. No I havent tried debug On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > Can you attach your source code or .ll file? Have you tried a debug build > of llc which might give a more readable stack dump or even an assertion > message. > > ~Craig > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 10:51 PM, hameeza ahmed via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> It happens only when i keep my vector width to >=64, why is that so...
2011 May 23
0
[LLVMdev] Debug llc crash using bugpoint
Do something like this: bugpoint -run-llc <bitcode file> --tool-args -- <llc arguments> Cameron On May 23, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Arushi Aggarwal wrote: > Hi, > > What is the best way to debug an llc crash using bugpoint? > > I am getting the following crash that I would like to reduce > > llc: /home/vadv...
2018 Mar 02
2
Segmentation fault when using llc to target riscv.
I am using LLVM version 4.0.1 Running `llc -march=riscv64 math.ll` returns: #0 0x0000000000fed7d1 (llc+0xfed7d1) #1 0x0000000000fec559 (llc+0xfec559) #2 0x0000000000fec8d9 (llc+0xfec8d9) #3 0x00007f22c044e5e0 __restore_rt (/lib64/libpthread.so.0+0xf5e0) #4 0x0000000000d7faf3 (llc+0xd7faf3) #5 0x0000000000cd4b88 (llc+0xcd4b88) #6 0x00000000...
2010 Jul 19
2
[LLVMdev] VMkit AOT build problem: llc crushed on glibj compilation to native(.s) file
....zip: $ cd vmkit/tools/vmjc/libvmjc $ make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 DISABLE_ASSERTIONS=1 REQUIRES_FRAME_POINTER=1 has eventually, after 50 minutes, brought: <<< llvm[0]: Compiling glibj.zip to llvm llvm[0]: Optimizing glibj.zip llvm[0]: Compiling glibj.zip.bc to native UNREACHABLE executed! 0 llc 0x0000000000c0e04f 1 llc 0x0000000000c0fc4a 2 libpthread.so.0 0x0000003b6400f0f0 3 libc.so.6 0x0000003b634326c5 gsignal + 53 4 libc.so.6 0x0000003b63433ea5 abort + 373 5 llc 0x0000000000bf07e4 llvm::llvm_unreachable_internal(char const*, char con...
2013 Aug 02
2
[LLVMdev] opt -O3 causes Assertion `New->getType() == getType() && "replaceAllUses of value with new value of different type!"' failed
...On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > Milind, > > Have you filed a bug on this? If not, can you please open a bug report (http://llvm.org/bugs)? > > -Hal > > ----- Original Message ----- >> I am hitting an LLVM assertion from the llc tool iff the bitcode file >> is optimized at -O3 level by opt). -O1 and -O2 levels of opt do not >> cause this assert. >> >> LLVM version 3.4svn >> DEBUG build with assertions. >> Built Jul 14 2013 (15:39:08). >> Default target: x86_64-unknown-linux-...
2005 Aug 27
1
[LLVMdev] llc problem
I got the following error in 1.5 release. As far as installation is concerned, everything went fine. llc hello.bc -o hello.bs llc((anonymous namespace)::PrintStackTrace()+0x17)[0xd435f1] llc((anonymous namespace)::SignalHandler(int)+0xbd)[0xd437ff] /lib64/tls/libc.so.6[0x3ff522e410] llc(llvm::Type::isFirstClassType() const+0x13)[0x8fc38d] llc(llvm::FunctionType::FunctionType(llvm::Type const*, std::ve...
2007 Apr 06
2
[LLVMdev] llc assertion failure
...e: > Hi Ryan, > > On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 13:34 -0500, Ryan M. Lefever wrote: > >>I am running the following llvm-ld command to produce native code: >> >>llvm-ld -native -o code.exe code.bc -lm >> >>However, I am getting the following assertion failure in llc. The >>bytecode has been processed with opt, it passes opt bytecode >>verification. I'm not too familiar with backend code generation. Does >>anyone have any insight in to what the problem might be or how to go >>about debugging it? > > > Okay, a couple...