search for: prudently

Dear R experts, I hope this is the right list for my question. As a newcomer in R, I am testing the R CAPER package, applying a simple regression on a phylogeny tree with three binary traits: (t1, t2, t3). My goal is to test the sensitivity to a correlation between t1 and t3. But if a correlation of 100% is considered (i.e. t3 = t1). The pgls method of CAPER seems to crash: You can find there

The fact that as.integer(TRUE) is 1 (and that for FALSE, it gives zero) is a really nice feature, eg when constructing piecewise functions (for example, as in -x*(x<0)+x*(x>=0)) and for many other things. Since I haven't found a reference about this, I just wanted to ask whether this is officialy part of the language or just a side effect (ie I want to know whether it is here to stay

Dear all, Very simple question, but apparently uneasy to solve in R: I have a sampling of a variable x: (3, 4. 5, 2, ...) I want to know: - the mean <x> -> mean(x) - the uncertainty on <x> -> std.error(x) ? Or sd(x)? - the standard deviation of x -> ? - the uncertainty on the standard deviation -> ? Anyone has an idea? Thanks in advance,

Full_Name: Russell V. Lenth Version: 2.3.1 OS: Windows XP Pro Submission from: (NULL) (128.255.132.188) I wrote a simple .BAT file to run the Sweave function on a file (via RTerm), then run pdflatex on the result (after RTerm exits). The issue is that if an error condition occurs in RTerm, it is prudent to not do the pdflatex processing afterward. Here are the relevant statements in the BAT

It would be nice if one of the list moms would immediately unsubscribe AND PERMANENTLY BAN idiots who use braindead autoreply filters. This should be official list policy for ALL email lists... On 2011-06-08 2:00 PM, samba-request at lists.samba.org wrote: > Subject: Re: [Samba] samba Digest, Vol 102, Issue 7 > From:> "Andrew McNaughton" <andrew at nleducation.org.uk>

This may seem simple but I've looked all over and come up with nothing. I'm interested in running Icecast 1.3.12 on port 80 to get around the firewall issue. Obviously it's not prudent to run Icecast at root so I'm wondering is there any way to safely run Icecast on port 80 using either setuid or port redirection? Has anyone accomplished this and if so, how'd you do it?

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:40:44AM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > On 01/25/2018 09:49 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 05:14:06PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > > > + > > > +static void report_free_page_func(struct work_struct *work) > > > +{ > > > + struct virtio_balloon *vb; > > > + int ret; > > > + > > > + vb =

I have upgraded from 1.2.6 to 2.0.1 and successfully passed all my test and manual testing. Everything seems to be working correctly. My application is pretty vanilla and so there where few complications. Question is, should I do another point upgrade (and if so, which point to upgrade to next) or is it safe (and prudent) to just go straight on to the current version (2.3.x). Advise would be

I have no example side effects in hand. But LLVM targets a bunch of architectures, and who knows what the future holds. So it may be prudent to not promise too much so as to leave ourselves an escape hatch. Doesn’t LLVM target some chips that have floating point instruction sets that are not IEEE compliant? Can we be certain that no new LLVM target will ever have to jump through hoops to avoid

Folks, I''ve been looking at creating a set of man pages for puppet and I''m trying to come up with a reasonable hierarchy. I''d appreciate any suggestions. So far, here''s what I''ve come up with: - puppet(1) - puppetca(1) - puppetdoc(1) - puppetrun(1) - puppetca.conf(5) - puppetd.conf(5) - puppetmasterd.conf(5) - puppetd(8) -

Dear list, I have found an unusual behavior and would like to check if it is a possible bug, and if updating R would fix it. I am not sure if should post it in this mail list but I don't where is R bug tracker. The only mention I found that might relate to this is "If times is a computed quantity it is prudent to add a small fuzz." in rep() help, but not sure if it is related to

On May 26, 2017, at 9:52 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > Mark H. David wrote: >> Notice the warning was given only for the WAVE file produced by the >> flac reference executable. > > I agree. The flac decoder should not generate WAV files which it > warns about when encoding. > >> Should I file a bug for this? > > No need.

Being new at distro SOPs, I don't know if this is an unusual thought. With a kernel debug package (or any such debug package) would it be prudent in todays world to have a checksum or signature process to assure the downloaded file is untampered with and complete? What prompts this is I just downloaded the kernel packages that Johnny put up. I had not realized they were so large and thought

I've been having a problem with getting a Mainpine OCTO+ working on CentOS Version 4. I know at some point I'll have to recompile the kernel in order to access all 8 ports but something is still not right. Wvdialconf almost every will id all of the ports. All too often it can fine the modem on at least half the ports on the board. I'm starting to hear that something is not right on V4

Dear all, I made a simple test of the Cholesky decomposition in the package 'Matrix', by considering 2 variables 100% correlated. http://blogs.sas.com/content/iml/2012/02/08/use-the-cholesky-transformation-to-correlate-and-uncorrelate-variables/ The full code is below and can be simply copy&paste in the R prompt. After uncorrelation I still have a correlation of +-100%...

I also agree that single bracket reference-style syntax is not prudent. As Jacob suggested, it creates ambiguity for the reader (Is it an edit or a link?). It also creates a new problem of potential conflict, however rare that may be. It seems reasonable to prefix a marker colon (possibly followed by whitespace): [:ref link] or [: ref link] And perhaps the same for attributes: {:att ref} or {:

https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?messageID=481859&#481859 https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?messageID=453572&#453572 This is a timebomb waiting to strike so many people who like do daily snapshot backups and keep them for few weeks and not realizing their snapshots are useless if they had accidentally mess up some boot related file earlier on. Another scenario you mess

On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 12:18:38PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:48:56AM +0300, Dan Aloni wrote: > > On 3.10.7 and x86_64, as a result of sizeof(struct vhost_scsi) being > > 2152960 bytes the allocation failed once on my development machine. > > > > Saw it would be prudent to split the bulk of it, which is the vqs array > > into

On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 12:18:38PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:48:56AM +0300, Dan Aloni wrote: > > On 3.10.7 and x86_64, as a result of sizeof(struct vhost_scsi) being > > 2152960 bytes the allocation failed once on my development machine. > > > > Saw it would be prudent to split the bulk of it, which is the vqs array > > into

Hi, I'm experimenting with host certificates in 5.4p1 and seem to have hit a usability issue. I've generated a host certificate, added the HostCertificate option to the sshd_config and restarted sshd. I've replaced the system's ssh_known_hosts file with one that has a single entry of the form: @cert-authority *.example.domain ssh-rsa ... This works provided that I use the