search for: prudent

...sion on a phylogeny tree with three binary traits: (t1, t2, t3). My goal is to test the sensitivity to a correlation between t1 and t3. But if a correlation of 100% is considered (i.e. t3 = t1). The pgls method of CAPER seems to crash: You can find there the code I used http://iktp.tu-dresden.de/~prudent/Divers/R/toy.R with the tree http://iktp.tu-dresden.de/~prudent/Divers/R/toy3.tree and the data http://iktp.tu-dresden.de/~prudent/Divers/R/toy_cor100.data just copy the .tree and .data files and run > R > source("toy.R") (please find the outpt below) Am I doing anything wrong?...

...ructing piecewise functions (for example, as in -x*(x<0)+x*(x>=0)) and for many other things. Since I haven't found a reference about this, I just wanted to ask whether this is officialy part of the language or just a side effect (ie I want to know whether it is here to stay and if it is prudent to use this). Thanks Tamas

...-> mean(x) - the uncertainty on <x> -> std.error(x) ? Or sd(x)? - the standard deviation of x -> ? - the uncertainty on the standard deviation -> ? Anyone has an idea? Thanks in advance, regards, Xavier -- *--------------------------------------- Xavier Prudent * * Computational biology and evolutionary genomics * * * *Guest scientist at the Max-Planck-Institut für Physik komplexer Systeme* *(MPI-PKS)* *Noethnitzer Str. 38* *01187 Dresden * * * *Max Planck-Institute for Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics* * (MPI-CBG) * * Pfotenhauerstraße 108 * * 01307 D...

Full_Name: Russell V. Lenth Version: 2.3.1 OS: Windows XP Pro Submission from: (NULL) (128.255.132.188) I wrote a simple .BAT file to run the Sweave function on a file (via RTerm), then run pdflatex on the result (after RTerm exits). The issue is that if an error condition occurs in RTerm, it is prudent to not do the pdflatex processing afterward. Here are the relevant statements in the BAT script: echo Sweave("%1",style=F,eps=F) | Rterm --no-save --no-restore if not errorlevel == 0 goto end The problem is that the errorlevel seems to always be 0, even if an error occurs. I...

...t: Re: [Samba] samba Digest, Vol 102, Issue 7 > From:> "Andrew McNaughton" <andrew at nleducation.org.uk> > > I am currently on annual leave. I will be back in the office on Friday > 10th June 2011. > > If you have an urgent matter needing attention, it may be prudent to > contact the ITSC main number 01236 757600. > > > Thanks. > -- > Andrew McNaughton > ICT Network Support Officer > Learning & Leisure Services > North Lanarkshire Council -- Best regards, Charles

This may seem simple but I've looked all over and come up with nothing. I'm interested in running Icecast 1.3.12 on port 80 to get around the firewall issue. Obviously it's not prudent to run Icecast at root so I'm wondering is there any way to safely run Icecast on port 80 using either setuid or port redirection? Has anyone accomplished this and if so, how'd you do it? Thanks! --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http:/...

...already reported. There aren't many zones so restartability wrt zones is kind of trivial. > The controversy is that the free list is not static > once the lock is dropped, so everything is dynamically changing, including > the state that was recorded. The method we are using is more prudent, IMHO. > How about taking the fundamental solution, and seek to improve incrementally > in the future? > > > Best, > Wei I'd like to see kicks happen outside the spinlock. kick with a spinlock taken looks like a scalability issue that won't be easy to reproduce but hurt...

...rom 1.2.6 to 2.0.1 and successfully passed all my test and manual testing. Everything seems to be working correctly. My application is pretty vanilla and so there where few complications. Question is, should I do another point upgrade (and if so, which point to upgrade to next) or is it safe (and prudent) to just go straight on to the current version (2.3.x). Advise would be most welcome. Paul Thompson -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez...

I have no example side effects in hand. But LLVM targets a bunch of architectures, and who knows what the future holds. So it may be prudent to not promise too much so as to leave ourselves an escape hatch. Doesn’t LLVM target some chips that have floating point instruction sets that are not IEEE compliant? Can we be certain that no new LLVM target will ever have to jump through hoops to avoid side effects simply because we promised th...

...1) - puppetdoc(1) - puppetrun(1) - puppetca.conf(5) - puppetd.conf(5) - puppetmasterd.conf(5) - puppetd(8) - puppetmasterd(8) At this point I am still working out the technical details of converting some of the existing reference documentation to valid man pages. However, I felt it prudent to have a shared sense of where this is going before I get too far into it. So, if you have comments or suggestions, please speak up. Thanks, -David

...have found an unusual behavior and would like to check if it is a possible bug, and if updating R would fix it. I am not sure if should post it in this mail list but I don't where is R bug tracker. The only mention I found that might relate to this is "If times is a computed quantity it is prudent to add a small fuzz." in rep() help, but not sure if it is related to this particular problem Here it goes: > rep(TRUE,29) [1] TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE [28] TRUE TRUE > rep(TR...

...oding. > >> Should I file a bug for this? > > No need. This is sufficient. > > Erik Are there some (old) programs that will not accept WAVEX headers? I'm trying to think of why the flac utility worked this way in the first place. In any event, it seems like it would be prudent to add a command line option to preserve the existing behavior, just in case anyone has archived their audio using FLAC and would need to maintain compatibility with the legacy WAVE format. It's not always possible to replace certain old programs, especially in recording studios. Brian Willoug...

Being new at distro SOPs, I don't know if this is an unusual thought. With a kernel debug package (or any such debug package) would it be prudent in todays world to have a checksum or signature process to assure the downloaded file is untampered with and complete? What prompts this is I just downloaded the kernel packages that Johnny put up. I had not realized they were so large and thought "TG I'm not on dial-up anymore". An...

...too often it can fine the modem on at least half the ports on the board. I'm starting to hear that something is not right on V4 when using the mainpine. System config: Dell 2650 dual Xeon with 2GB ram. Has anyone setup a OCTO+ on V4 yet? Thanks John Warren Network Operations Administrator Prudent Rx Inc. 100 Corporate Pointe, Suite 395 Culver City, CA 90230 P: +1 (310)642-1700 x121 F: +1 (310)642-1701 e: jwarren at prudentrx.com **Notice of Confidentiality** Please note that the information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure under th...

...ix(nrow=2,ncol=4) for( i in 1:4 ) decObs[,i]=choM%*%obs[,i] # Other possibility #decObs=solve(choM,obs) # Plot plot(decObs[1,], decObs[2,],pch=16) ########################################### Does anyone have an idea? Thanks, regards, Xavier -- *--------------------------------------- Xavier Prudent * * Computational biology and evolutionary genomics * * * *Guest scientist at the Max-Planck-Institut für Physik komplexer Systeme* *(MPI-PKS)* *Noethnitzer Str. 38* *01187 Dresden * * * *Max Planck-Institute for Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics* * (MPI-CBG) * * Pfotenhauerstraße 108 * * 01307 D...

I also agree that single bracket reference-style syntax is not prudent. As Jacob suggested, it creates ambiguity for the reader (Is it an edit or a link?). It also creates a new problem of potential conflict, however rare that may be. It seems reasonable to prefix a marker colon (possibly followed by whitespace): [:ref link] or [: ref link] And perhaps the same for...

...ot related file earlier on. Another scenario you mess up the sudoers file or the root authorized keys - you'd have to loose a whole days data and go to previous nights restore just for single file error like that ? If AWS marketplace is unable to remove this hardcoded rule then it's only prudent to remove Centos from AWS marketplace and release it in the community section instead ? Thoughts ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/attachments/20140308/9c2002b2/attachment-0006.html>

...:18:38PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:48:56AM +0300, Dan Aloni wrote: > > On 3.10.7 and x86_64, as a result of sizeof(struct vhost_scsi) being > > 2152960 bytes the allocation failed once on my development machine. > > > > Saw it would be prudent to split the bulk of it, which is the vqs array > > into separately allocated parts. sizeof(struct vhost_virtqueue) is > > currently 16816 bytes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Aloni <alonid at stratoscale.com> > > This extra indirection is likely to have measureab...

...:18:38PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:48:56AM +0300, Dan Aloni wrote: > > On 3.10.7 and x86_64, as a result of sizeof(struct vhost_scsi) being > > 2152960 bytes the allocation failed once on my development machine. > > > > Saw it would be prudent to split the bulk of it, which is the vqs array > > into separately allocated parts. sizeof(struct vhost_virtqueue) is > > currently 16816 bytes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Aloni <alonid at stratoscale.com> > > This extra indirection is likely to have measureab...

....example.domain ssh-rsa ... This works provided that I use the host's FQDn when I ssh to it. If I use an unqualified name, the connection is made but the certificate verification fails. I suppose an entry like @cert-authority *,*.example.domain ssh-rsa ... would work, but it doesn't seem prudent. How are you supposed to specify that the cert-authority is for the local domain? It seem like the name of the target host should be resolved to a FQDN prior to checking whether or not the cert-authority is applicable. I know this issue _could_ be addressed by listing the unqualified name as well...