search for: protesting

Dear All, I am using a Procrustes analysis to compare two NMDS ordinations for the same set of sites. One ordination is based on fish data, the other is based on invertebrate data. Ordinations were derived using metaMDS() from the {vegan} library as follows: fish.mds<-metaMDS(fish.data, distance="bray", k=3, trymax=100, wascores=TRUE, trace=TRUE, zero="add")

Protest the Microsoft-Novell Patent Agreement self explanatory http://techp.org/petition/show/1 Craig

I just setup a Planet aggregator site for Ruby on Rails blogs and the wiki. It''s at: http://www.planetrubyonrails.org/ jim

On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:15:05 -0800 Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Scott Robbins <scottro at nyc.rr.com> > wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 03:39:47PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > >> On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 16:13:17 -0500 > >> Scott Robbins wrote: > >> > You may have noticed how if Fedora, by some odd

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:27:55PM +0000, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:15:05 -0800 > Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Scott Robbins <scottro at nyc.rr.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Centos 7 does that as well. > > > Heh, I guess I've used good passwords in my installs

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:56:21PM +0000, Always Learning wrote: > Of course Alice can. All of us can. Hopefully it is constructive > criticism. Seeing good software being replaced by less good, less > useful and more awkward software usually provoke the software's users to > protest. Complaining on the CentOS list is probably not that productive, though. -- Jonathan Billings

I''m doing some housekeeping and just realised that the rdoc formatter produces gibberish: http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rdoc/files/EXAMPLES_rd.html Will anyone protest if I just go ahead and remove it? (I can''t imagine anyone using it, especially with the much better HTML formatter) Aslak

...) >>> >>> OP's point is that probably in RHEL8 you won't be able to do even >>> that anymore. >> >> Exactly. There is some complaining going on on the Fedora testing >> list, >> not sure where else one can protest. >> > > Well, protesting here would be meaningless .. as is protesting systemd > here. CentOS-8 will have whatever is in the RHEL-8 source code, > exactly > as it is in that source code minus branding. Just like CentOS-2.1, 3, > 4, 5, and 6. Our goal is to rebuild the source code exactly, bugs and > all....

Hi, I have been trying to create a function to generate a Procrustes plot, generated from package "vegan" in lattice. standard vegan code as follows library(vegan) pro=protest(P1, P8, permutations=4999,choices=1:4) plot(pro) Now, here is the code for the function that I have failed to get to work properly. panel.procrustes=function(x,y) }Pro=protest(x,y,permutations=4999,choices=1:4)

It seems like every time I try to do something a little different, I cannot get output saved just right. This is on RedHat 7.2 with R 1.4.1. The png output looks fine, but the eps output has the problem that the bounding box on the legend cuts the legend in half. I put a copy of a bad one here: http://lark.cc.ukans.edu/~pauljohn/ResearchPapers/meanProtest-box.eps When I asked about these

...39;t tell this to >>> anyone! ;-) >> >> OP's point is that probably in RHEL8 you won't be able to do even >> that anymore. > > Exactly. There is some complaining going on on the Fedora testing list, > not sure where else one can protest. > Well, protesting here would be meaningless .. as is protesting systemd here. CentOS-8 will have whatever is in the RHEL-8 source code, exactly as it is in that source code minus branding. Just like CentOS-2.1, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Our goal is to rebuild the source code exactly, bugs and all. We want all the behavior...

...d use it to send further emails to ?user@?. I?ve been on the Internet a looong time, and these old mailman style things aren?t that common these days. I am involved in a lot of community projects though, so I do understand the need for cheap and platform-less. Again, I don't get why you're protesting an established mailing list. To quote Montell Jordan, "This is how we do it!" ;)

Hi List, I want to secure my server from the hacker's. What is the case by which I can protest it. I have done security of Dialplan, Sip,IAX base security. For linux we are working on Iptables. What else is left so that I will do it too... -- ----- Thanks and regards Virendra Bhati +91-9172341457 Asterisk Engineer -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

How does one loop over factors? Perhaps this is a newbie question. I tried: > b [1] caseX caseY caseZ Levels: caseX caseY caseZ > length(b) [1] 3 > > for (i in b) { + print (b == i) ; + print (i); + } [1] FALSE FALSE FALSE [1] 1 [1] FALSE FALSE FALSE [1] 2 [1] FALSE FALSE FALSE [1] 3 > But that strangely doesn't work. I must protest the implications of the above. i , as

Dear List: An e-mail mentioning the r-project.org address and sent to a friend at a German university was considered spam by the local spam filter. Its reasoning: the URL "r-project.org" is blacklisted at uribl.swinog.ch resp. at antispam.imp.ch. I checked the list http://antispam.imp.ch/swinog-uri-rbl.txt [caution: long list] and indeed, there it was. Can anybody explain how or

Hi! I'm trying to do a lm() test on three objects. My problem is that R protests and says that the variable lengths differ for one of the objects (Sweden.GDP.gap). But I have double checked that the number of observations are the same. All three objects should contain 9 observations but R only accepts 9 observations in two of the objects. The third must have 10! Very confusing because there

Does anyone else miss email-friendly character graphics such as the following example, produced using Minitab? Histogram of C6 N = 478 N* = 21 Each * represents 2 observation(s) Midpoint Count -12 16 ******** -11 53 *************************** -10 63 ******************************** -9 83

Hi, all. The help file for tapply says that if simplify is true, and the result of the calculation is always a scalar, then tapply will return a vector. Nonetheless: > t1 <- tapply(runif(10), rep(1:5, 2), mean) > is.vector(t1) [1] FALSE > is.array(t1) [1] TRUE > I have found this in version 0.65.1 on an SGI running Irix 6.5, and on a Mac running Linux-PPC. I've also

Dear vegan team, Vegan development happens now completely in github. R-Forge repository is no more in sync with github. I tried to commit all github changes to R-Forge, but a week ago I got a conflict in file and I haven't had time to resolve that conflict. You can follow vegan development and vegan discussion also without signing to github. The system seems to be completely open and does not

...re is no rational reason. Got one? Lay it on me. Please include a description of the threat model where a password like byrnej123 should be allowed, which *is* allowed in EL7, as long as root is setting it and says ?Yes, I really am sure I want such a dreadfully easy to crack password.? > 5. Protesting there is evidently meaningless as well. While I?ve got the floor, I would like to encourage everyone to send mail to god at universe.org to protest tomorrow?s sunrise. Rationale: Melanoma is bad. > This change was not discussed Hmm, yes, let?s hold public committee hearings for every technic...