I''m doing some housekeeping and just realised that the rdoc formatter produces gibberish: http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rdoc/files/EXAMPLES_rd.html Will anyone protest if I just go ahead and remove it? (I can''t imagine anyone using it, especially with the much better HTML formatter) Aslak
does this mean that: rake spec:doc will not produce plain text specdocs? On Nov 11, 2007, at 3:39 PM, aslak hellesoy wrote:> I''m doing some housekeeping and just realised that the rdoc formatter > produces gibberish: > http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rdoc/files/EXAMPLES_rd.html > > Will anyone protest if I just go ahead and remove it? (I can''t imagine > anyone using it, especially with the much better HTML formatter) > > Aslak > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
On Nov 12, 2007 12:45 AM, s.ross <cwdinfo at gmail.com> wrote:> does this mean that: > > rake spec:doc > > will not produce plain text specdocs? >No, spec:doc will remain untouched. I''m not talking about --format specdoc (which the spec:doc task uses), but --format rdoc, which is supposed to create RDoc - a file you can include in your RDocs. Since it''s not producing what RDoc needs, I''d like to retire it. Aslak> > > On Nov 11, 2007, at 3:39 PM, aslak hellesoy wrote: > > > I''m doing some housekeeping and just realised that the rdoc formatter > > produces gibberish: > > http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rdoc/files/EXAMPLES_rd.html > > > > Will anyone protest if I just go ahead and remove it? (I can''t imagine > > anyone using it, especially with the much better HTML formatter) > > > > Aslak > > _______________________________________________ > > rspec-users mailing list > > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >
On Nov 11, 2007, at 11:49 pm, aslak hellesoy wrote:> I''m not talking about --format specdoc (which the spec:doc task uses), > but --format rdoc, which is supposed to create RDoc - a file you can > include in your RDocs. Since it''s not producing what RDoc needs, I''d > like to retire it.I didn''t even know it could do that, so I won''t miss it. I live off autotest + HTML (via TM). Ashley -- blog @ http://aviewfromafar.net/ linked-in @ http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran currently @ home
On Nov 11, 2007 8:39 PM, aslak hellesoy <aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com> wrote:> I''m doing some housekeeping and just realised that the rdoc formatter > produces gibberish: > http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rdoc/files/EXAMPLES_rd.html > > Will anyone protest if I just go ahead and remove it? (I can''t imagine > anyone using it, especially with the much better HTML formatter) >Go ahead, I didn''t know was there :-P HTML output is more fancy than RDoc ;-) -- Luis Lavena Multimedia systems - Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort, which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that is worthwhile. Vince Lombardi