search for: probabi

Morning Folks, should I prefer NFS with UCARP or native GlusterFS mounts for serving the system images to XCP? Which one performes better over 1G network links? NFS is probaby easier to setup due to existing tools like rpcinfo and showmount, both are used inside the storage container code, and there is some code for NFS, not for GlusterFS, except I write one. UCARP has the disadvantage that

I''m getting complaints from one of my customers that characters in their text are getting mangled. This happens when they paste data into my textboxes in rails from MS word in particluar. Quotes are turning into question marks, etc. Anyone have a fix / workaround for this? -- seth at subimage interactive http://www.subimage.com/sublog/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Did a quick search, but didn''t come up with anything definitive. So what does everyone think is the best low maintenance and most hassle free way to go for deployment? Is lighttpd still everyone''s choice? I remember seeing one that was a pre-packaged environment with apache I think. Anyway, just about to deploy an app and thought I''d ask suggestions - want to see

On 02/04/2023 09:21, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > Neither of the 3 should be a problem. Especially the ones which > are already set by default.? --enable-fhs uses slightly different > layout within $prefix, that's all. The build-time configuration > looks entirely okay. You may be correct Michael, but I still wouldn't use '--enable-fhs' by itself. > >

Hi, I''m having a little trouble figuring out how to make a self- referential HABTM bi-directional. I have a Employee class. Each employee can have a couple of bosses, who are also employees. The employee class has the following HABTM: has_and_belongs_to_many :bosses, :class_name => "Employee", :join_table => "bosses_courses", :association_foreign_key =>

I have an FC5 system with a powerware 5110 usb ups. The system seems to find the UPS ------------------------------ [root@b1 src]# lsusb Bus 004 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 Bus 003 Device 002: ID 0592:0002 Powerware Corp. Bus 003 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 Bus 005 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 ------------------------------- [root@b1

>> Everything builds fine on sparc. The configure script needs to be fixed >> though (see previous email). > > I'm not getting the error with the configure script (on Kain, anyway). I've > tried it with --with-f2c and with f96 (NAG Fortran compiler) in and out of my > $PATH. I get the error with and without the --with-f2c option. I never used the NAG Fotran

Tanya Lattner wrote: > > Everything builds fine on sparc. The configure script needs to be fixed > though (see previous email). I'm not getting the error with the configure script (on Kain, anyway). I've tried it with --with-f2c and with f96 (NAG Fortran compiler) in and out of my $PATH. Can you verify that the configure script works for you without the --with-f2c option?

02.04.2023 10:34, Rowland Penny via samba ?????: > On 02/04/2023 08:05, Anderson Sampaio Mello via samba wrote: >> Thanks for the answer. >> >> The path for the two DCs is correct yes, and yes I compiled it for the two >> DC servers like this: >> >> ./configure --with-systemd --prefix=/usr/local/samba --enable-fhs > > And that is possibly your problem:

Hola! I have a problem which is not strictly R, although R will be used for the analysis. We have data from a large investigation of drug abuse, initially analyzed by logistic regression. But the pupils are selected by first sampling schools, and as it happens the prevalence of use varies sharply from school to school, so there is over-dispersion. Now we are interested in comparing the

Just a couple of small bug-lets/stuffs in Sweave: - It stripes off the two lines starting with @ (this is a verbatim section showing plink's start-up message): ======================================= @----------------------------------------------------------@ | PLINK! | v0.99p | 17/Dec/2006 | |----------------------------------------------------------| | (C)

i downloaded the vorbis, ogg & example files and compiled them and now have an executable called 'vorbisfile' that turns 'test.ogg' into 'out.pcm'. is there some simple way to test the out.pcm file in winXP? ~~~~~~~ bob hurt I can't stand cheap people. It makes me real mad when someone says something like "Hey, when are you going to pay me that hundred

Everything builds fine on sparc. The configure script needs to be fixed though (see previous email). Sparc testing results: make check: # of expected passes 1189 # of expected failures 34 Regressions Single Source: None New Failures Single Source (new tests): 2005-05-12-Int64ToFP: llc,jit Regressions MultiSource: Applications/d/make_dparser: llc, cbe, jit

I am the one that placed the bounty. After it being there for 2 months and getting no takers (and very few if any people asking about it), we are almost finished writing it in house. I'll keep the bounty up untill we do finish our product so if anyone beats us to getting it working they'll get paid... W. Kevin Hunt CCIE #11841 MCSE, Linux+ SME www.huntbrothers.com >

Tanya Lattner wrote: > >>> Everything builds fine on sparc. The configure script needs to be >>> fixed though (see previous email). >> >> >> I'm not getting the error with the configure script (on Kain, anyway). >> I've tried it with --with-f2c and with f96 (NAG Fortran compiler) in >> and out of my $PATH. > > > I get the

First of all thank you all for the answers and for trying to help me. I agree with you michael regarding the parameters passed in the ./configure command, the location is not part of the problem. The file system used is XFS. and the strace command logs are in the attached link https://drive.google.com/file/d/1R_b6TzeJVmNIpnlkPfRk0CtkpeU4dgcg/view?usp=share_link Rowland, the result of the

On 19.3.2013 19:13, LRN wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 19.03.2013 20:35, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote: >> On 19.3.2013 15:49, JonY wrote: >>> On 3/19/2013 19:59, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote: >>>> On 18.3.2013 12:25, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >>>>> JonY wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Before anyone does

Tanya Lattner wrote: > >> 1. I'm still looking for volunteers to test MacOS X and Solaris. >> If you'd like to volunteer, please email the list to let us know. > > > I'll do minimal testing on Sparc. I'm not going to look into any > regressions though since no one has been really watching Sparc since I > graduated and I am sure there are

Yes you are right, i realized that just after i sent the email, that it was a bit in haste. anyway, if there is anyway how to optimize dovecot for effective delivery of 20k+ emails within a few minutes, id be glad to know. .. and i will have to ask the same q at postfix mailinglists gnd/ On 7/14/20 8:12 PM, John Stoffel wrote: > > gnd> we are experimenting with using Dovecot as part

I''m trying to simulate a satellite link to a Linux server to test application performance. I haven''t used any of the tc stuff before, but I blandly assured people it would be "easy" to set up a simulated long thin pipe on a spare network interface. However, now that I''m exploring, it''s proving quite difficult. Let me start with the general question