search for: probaby

Morning Folks, should I prefer NFS with UCARP or native GlusterFS mounts for serving the system images to XCP? Which one performes better over 1G network links? NFS is probaby easier to setup due to existing tools like rpcinfo and showmount, both are used inside the storage container code, and there is some code for NFS, not for GlusterFS, except I write one. UCARP has the disadvantage that the cluster IP is moved away from dead systems, not from dead gluster server...

I''m getting complaints from one of my customers that characters in their text are getting mangled. This happens when they paste data into my textboxes in rails from MS word in particluar. Quotes are turning into question marks, etc. Anyone have a fix / workaround for this? -- seth at subimage interactive http://www.subimage.com/sublog/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

...t hassle free way to go for deployment? Is lighttpd still everyone''s choice? I remember seeing one that was a pre-packaged environment with apache I think. Anyway, just about to deploy an app and thought I''d ask suggestions - want to see what else is out there. It''s probaby just going shared server at textdrive for the time being, though. Cheers. Jason -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...default.? --enable-fhs uses slightly different > layout within $prefix, that's all. The build-time configuration > looks entirely okay. You may be correct Michael, but I still wouldn't use '--enable-fhs' by itself. > > There's something else going on here. Very probaby. > > Anderson, what filesystem the sysvol is on? This may be the cause, but it isn't being helped by Anderson using the wrong tool to check the permissions, he should be using samba-tool because this is a DC and the permissions are stored in an EA. I suggest he posts the output of:...

...quot;, :join_table => "bosses_courses", :association_foreign_key => "boss_id", :foreign_key => "employee_id" Now this works fine.. but only one way. I can get all bosses of an employee but I can''t get all employees of a boss. In hindsight I think it probaby would have been better to use a :through relationship for this, but I can''t really change the database schema now. The solution might be to code something like a subordinate method for the employee class myself, but I''m not sure how to do that. Does anyone has any good suggestio...

I have an FC5 system with a powerware 5110 usb ups. The system seems to find the UPS ------------------------------ [root@b1 src]# lsusb Bus 004 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 Bus 003 Device 002: ID 0592:0002 Powerware Corp. Bus 003 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 Bus 005 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 ------------------------------- [root@b1

...month or more. > I've tried out a few programs: hexxagon is an XFAIL (Solaris doesn't have > stdint.h), and make_dparser is genuinely broken (even with Chris's llvm-gcc > fix). Some of the Prolangs-C tests are working now, probably due to Chris's > fix, so Sparc is probaby in better shape than it looks. I am pretty sure hexxagon worked at one point.. but it doesnt matter. > If you want to try out the new CFE, just re-download it using the same > directions I gave before. The new one is built and ready to go. Unless someone is going to actively fix these.....

..., we'll probably ship it as is. I've tried out a few programs: hexxagon is an XFAIL (Solaris doesn't have stdint.h), and make_dparser is genuinely broken (even with Chris's llvm-gcc fix). Some of the Prolangs-C tests are working now, probably due to Chris's fix, so Sparc is probaby in better shape than it looks. If you want to try out the new CFE, just re-download it using the same directions I gave before. The new one is built and ready to go. -- John T. > > Sparc testing results: > > make check: > # of expected passes 1189 > # of expected...

02.04.2023 10:34, Rowland Penny via samba ?????: > On 02/04/2023 08:05, Anderson Sampaio Mello via samba wrote: >> Thanks for the answer. >> >> The path for the two DCs is correct yes, and yes I compiled it for the two >> DC servers like this: >> >> ./configure --with-systemd --prefix=/usr/local/samba --enable-fhs > > And that is possibly your problem:

...(93, 96, 99), which were analysed assuming no overdispersion, withouyt investigating that issue. For various reasons we can not get hold of the original databases from those studies, only the published summary statistics. But we know the structure of sampling were the same as in the 2002 study, so probaby the overdispersion were the same (at least assuming that is the best I can do). So assuming equal overdispersion I can get four confidence interval s of "binomial" p's, but people will want an hypothesis test of the overall null: p_1=p_2=p_3=p_4. Is there some way I can construct an...

...does not like having any \usepackage[whatever]{inputenc} (it assumes inputs are always utf-8) While both of these can be worked around - using \input{} for anything Sweave might mess with, and put a % in front of \userpackage[inputenc] (Sweave seems to read LaTeX comments as real; but that's probaby a mis-feature...); SWeave probably should not stripe @ without a starting <<>>= noweb marker. Had a couple of discussion elsewhere - it seems that international stuff in LaTeX, XeTeX and/or LuaTeX are the main ones to use, but for most parts people still stick to regional encodings (e....

i downloaded the vorbis, ogg & example files and compiled them and now have an executable called 'vorbisfile' that turns 'test.ogg' into 'out.pcm'. is there some simple way to test the out.pcm file in winXP? ~~~~~~~ bob hurt I can't stand cheap people. It makes me real mad when someone says something like "Hey, when are you going to pay me that hundred

Everything builds fine on sparc. The configure script needs to be fixed though (see previous email). Sparc testing results: make check: # of expected passes 1189 # of expected failures 34 Regressions Single Source: None New Failures Single Source (new tests): 2005-05-12-Int64ToFP: llc,jit Regressions MultiSource: Applications/d/make_dparser: llc, cbe, jit

...irst part. Does Asterisk have SMDI support > >>built in or has someone written a module for it? > >> > >> > >> > > > >There is a $3,000 bounty out on the wiki for SMDI > integration. I'm sure > >you could dig up more. Hell, I'd probaby chip in 500 or so. > Most of it > >is already written too. > > > >There you go all you programmers. Want to make some cash? > Pretty good > >bounty on this one! > > > >-Chuji > >_______________________________________________ > >Asterisk-Use...

...>> I've tried out a few programs: hexxagon is an XFAIL (Solaris doesn't >> have stdint.h), and make_dparser is genuinely broken (even with >> Chris's llvm-gcc fix). Some of the Prolangs-C tests are working now, >> probably due to Chris's fix, so Sparc is probaby in better shape than >> it looks. > > > I am pretty sure hexxagon worked at one point.. but it doesnt matter. > >> If you want to try out the new CFE, just re-download it using the same >> directions I gave before. The new one is built and ready to go. > >...

...nt > > layout within $prefix, that's all. The build-time configuration > > looks entirely okay. > > You may be correct Michael, but I still wouldn't use '--enable-fhs' by > itself. > > > > > There's something else going on here. > > Very probaby. > > > > > Anderson, what filesystem the sysvol is on? > > This may be the cause, but it isn't being helped by Anderson using the > wrong tool to check the permissions, he should be using samba-tool > because this is a DC and the permissions are stored in an EA. I sug...

On 19.3.2013 19:13, LRN wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 19.03.2013 20:35, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote: >> On 19.3.2013 15:49, JonY wrote: >>> On 3/19/2013 19:59, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote: >>>> On 18.3.2013 12:25, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >>>>> JonY wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Before anyone does

Tanya Lattner wrote: > >> 1. I'm still looking for volunteers to test MacOS X and Solaris. >> If you'd like to volunteer, please email the list to let us know. > > > I'll do minimal testing on Sparc. I'm not going to look into any > regressions though since no one has been really watching Sparc since I > graduated and I am sure there are

Yes you are right, i realized that just after i sent the email, that it was a bit in haste. anyway, if there is anyway how to optimize dovecot for effective delivery of 20k+ emails within a few minutes, id be glad to know. .. and i will have to ask the same q at postfix mailinglists gnd/ On 7/14/20 8:12 PM, John Stoffel wrote: > > gnd> we are experimenting with using Dovecot as part

I''m trying to simulate a satellite link to a Linux server to test application performance. I haven''t used any of the tc stuff before, but I blandly assured people it would be "easy" to set up a simulated long thin pipe on a spare network interface. However, now that I''m exploring, it''s proving quite difficult. Let me start with the general question