search for: pornographi

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "pornographi".

Did you mean: pornographic
2006 Jul 25
3
Ruby hangman (was Re: List etiquette question)
"Beast" is more appropriate than you know. It''s definately Frankenstein code. (read: it ain''t pretty, but it works - some of the time). Anyway, it entertains my wife; not sure if hardcore programmers will get anything out of it or not. You might find it interesting (or pointless) that in a complete bastardization of rails'' main reason for being it
2018 Mar 08
5
Squid and HTTPS interception on CentOS 7 ?
Le 08/03/2018 ? 11:30, hw a ?crit : > The government says you must use squidguard to filter something? The law in France (Code P?nal, article 227-24) states that a public network is not allowed to broadcast messages containing violence, pornography or any content contrary to basic human dignity, which is theoretically punishable with three years of prison or a 75.000 ? fee. So any network
2003 Sep 29
1
RE: Asterisk list a SPAMer (uol.com.br), I think not ...
All, seems I too am suffering from posts to the list and being accused of SPAMing .... -----Original Message----- From: AntiSpam UOL [mailto:andersoncbr.sspam@uol.com.br] Sent: 26 September 2003 20:48 To: alow@prioritytelecom.com Subject: RE:RE: [Asterisk-Users] RTP routing.. <http://antispam.uol.com.br> <http://mail.i.uol.com.br/tirateima_txt.gif>
2004 Nov 24
2
Grumble ...
Hi Folks, A Grumble ... The message I just sent to R-help about "The hidden costs of GPL ..." has evoked a "Challenge" response: Hi, You??ve just sent a message to diagnosticando at uol.com.br In order to confirm the sent message, please click here This confirmation is necessary because diagnosticando at uol.com.br uses Antispam UOL, a service that avoids unwanted
2003 Sep 25
2
FW: RE: AntiSpam UOL
Every time I send an e-mail to the * list, I receive this "AntiSpam UOL" E-mail. is anybody else experiencing the same? How can I get rid of it? Uriel -----Original Message----- From: AntiSpam UOL [mailto:andersoncbr.sspam@uol.com.br] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:51 PM To: uriel@adelphia.net Subject: RE:RE: [Asterisk-Users] SIP / GrandStream Configuration Ol?,
2018 Mar 07
2
Squid and HTTPS interception on CentOS 7 ?
Le 06/03/2018 ? 18:48, hw a ?crit?: > And how do you get a list of IPs from which data could be retrieved > which the students are not supposed to see? > > How is this done anyway, does the government give out a list of URLs > or IPs which you are required to block?? If not, what if you overlook > something? Here's some information.
2018 Mar 08
0
Squid and HTTPS interception on CentOS 7 ?
Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Le 08/03/2018 ? 11:30, hw a ?crit : >> The government says you must use squidguard to filter something? > > The law in France (Code P?nal, article 227-24) states that a public > network is not allowed to broadcast messages containing violence, > pornography or any content contrary to basic human dignity, which is > theoretically punishable with
2002 Jan 08
0
Solaris 8 Kerberos PAM and OpenSSH
Hello, I am experiencing an error when using the Kerberos V PAM module provided with Solaris 8 with OpenSSH versions 2.9.9p2 and 3.0.2p1. The connection is established, the prompt appears, the motd of the remote system is sometimes displayed, and then the connection closes. This looks to be an error with the PAM module and not OpenSSH, but the problem only affects OpenSSH - all the other
2003 Sep 26
0
G729 experiences.. (fwd)
Woooow! Kick this guy out from this list and pls filter *@uol.com.br It's very annoying.... Isamar ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 08:48:45 -0300 (BRT) From: AntiSpam UOL <andersoncbr.sspam@uol.com.br> To: isamar@isamarmaia.org Subject: RE:RE: [Asterisk-Users] G729 experiences.. [antispam_txt.gif] Ol=E1, Voc=EA enviou uma mensagem para
2003 Sep 23
0
FW: RE: iaxtel and iax.conf (HTML CONTENT, FYI)
I hate to post HTML to the list, but I refuse to respond to this, and I would like to say that whomever is using this service is kinda stupid for subscribing an email address to the list using this service. I hope they learn a lesson by us, the list users, NOT responding to this, and eventually, after not receiving any list mail, they?ll wonder ?hmm why is this list so dead?? Just my .02.
2003 Sep 29
0
RE: Asterisk list a SPAMer (uol.com.br), I t hink not ...
Thanks, annoying but only course of action I guess ... (c; > -----Original Message----- > From: WipeOut [mailto:wipe_out@lycos.co.uk] > Sent: 29 September 2003 10:36 > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] RE: Asterisk list a SPAMer > (uol.com.br), I think not ... > > > Just add a filter to your mail client to delete all mail from >