search for: placements

I''m trying to figure out how to change the order of a list view and it''s obvious to me that I don''t understand what I get from a simple scaffold to know enough to alter it. If someone would be so kind to tell me what this means ... def list @placment_pages, @placements = paginate :placements, :per_page => 10 end @placement_pages, # I am guessing that this calculates the total pages @placements = paginate :placements, # I am guessing that this calculates # pagination from total placements /...

I''ve asked this in various ways but I can''t seem to get much traction - my guess is because not many people are doing this. I am working in a controller/views called placements. Placements belongs_to :client I have a clients model/table - clients has_many :placements in placements/find...this works fine... <%= text_field_with_auto_complete :placement, :clwholename, {} %> if I put the same code into placements/new or placements/edit, I get a No method ''clw...

placement.rb has_one :client has_one :case_manager client.rb belongs_to :case_manager has_many :placements case_manager.rb has_many :clients has_many :placements I am trying to create a view file for placements. I can pull columns from clients table in this view by using... <%= @placement.client.wholename %> but if I use <% @placement.case_manager.wholename %> I get error......

because I am a grasshopper... Now that I can sort my ''list''...is there a logical way of not repeating myself to having essentially the same list view with multiple sorts? i.e. def list_cl # ordered by clients last name @placement_pages, @placements = paginate( :placements, :include => [:client], :order_by => ''clients.last_name'', :per_page => 14) end def list_fac # ordered by facility @placement_pages, @placements = paginate( :placements, :include => [:facility],...

...ord and click the ''show'' button. I put in a ''link'' at the bottom of ''show.rhtml'' to my ''view'' rfn2.rhtml - action = ''rfn2'', :id = @placement I click this link and get error... log/development.log Processing PlacementsController#rfn2 (for 127.0.0.1 at 2006-02-05 22:44:55) [GET] Parameters: {"action"=>"rfn2", "id"=>"4", "controller"=>"placements"} Placement Load (0.010998) SELECT * FROM placements WHERE (placements.id = ''4''...

I have a form that prints fine for one particular criteria... facility_id = "X" controller code looks like this... def fac_log @facility = Facility.find(params[:report][:facility_id]) @placement = Placement.find(:all, :conditions => [ "facility_id = ? and discharge_date IS NULL, params[:report][:facility_id] ] ) end I can print out the form

Previously we were filling it the same as "placements", but in some cases there're valid alternatives that we were ignoring completely. Keeping a back-up memory type helps on several low-mem situations. Signed-off-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez at riseup.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++--------...

I abandoned ruby way for find_by_sql and still can''t get this... @myplacement = Placement.find_by_sql( "select * from placement where :intake_date >= beg_intake_date and :intake_date <= end_intake_date") just a simple date range...it''s killing me - If I knew how to load placement controller into irb, I could probably try out finds interactive mode... Thanks

About rationale, usage and (some small bits of) API. Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> --- Changes from v7: * avoid referring to 4.2 release as "upcoming". * libxl placement disabling key explicitly mentioned. * Limit of max 16 NUMA nodes explicitly mentioned. Changes from v6: * text updated to

I would swear that I am tracking exactly the method used in Agile book... TypeError in Placements#edit Showing app/views/placements/_form.rhtml where line #33 raised: wrong argument type String (expected Module) Extracted source (around line #33): 30: <tr> 31: <td><label for "type">Type</label></br><%= 32: options = [["Select...

...t; + --gbo->pin_count; > + if (gbo->pin_count) > + return 0; > + > + if (gbo->kmap.virtual) > + ttm_bo_kunmap(&gbo->kmap); > + > + drm_gem_vram_placement(gbo, TTM_PL_FLAG_SYSTEM); > + for (i = 0; i < gbo->placement.num_placement ; ++i) > + gbo->placements[i].flags |= TTM_PL_FLAG_NO_EVICT; > + > + ret = ttm_bo_validate(&gbo->bo, &gbo->placement, &ctx); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + return 0; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_vram_push_to_system); Very simliar to drm_gem_vram_unpin, can't we just call...

...t; + --gbo->pin_count; > + if (gbo->pin_count) > + return 0; > + > + if (gbo->kmap.virtual) > + ttm_bo_kunmap(&gbo->kmap); > + > + drm_gem_vram_placement(gbo, TTM_PL_FLAG_SYSTEM); > + for (i = 0; i < gbo->placement.num_placement ; ++i) > + gbo->placements[i].flags |= TTM_PL_FLAG_NO_EVICT; > + > + ret = ttm_bo_validate(&gbo->bo, &gbo->placement, &ctx); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + return 0; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_vram_push_to_system); Very simliar to drm_gem_vram_unpin, can't we just call...

can''t seem to find the right syntax for this... /script/../config/../app/controllers/placements_controller.rb:155: syntax error :conditions => [["placements.client_id = ?", params[:client_id] ] and "placements.discharge_date IS NOT NULL" ], this part works... :conditions => ["placements.client_id = ?", params[:client_id] ] this is what I want to...

Dear All I am running Sweave with xtable and want to put the caption placement on top. But this does not work. Any idea what is going wrong? Here is an example that runs properly with the exception of the caption placement in the pdf-file. \documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article} \usepackage{Sweave} \begin{document} <<>>= x = runif(100, 1, 10) y = 2 + 3 * x + rnorm(100)

...ct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo = drm_gem_vram_of_bo(bo); > + drm_gem_vram_destroy(gbo); > +} > + > +static void drm_gem_vram_placement(struct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo, int pl_flag) > +{ > + unsigned int i; > + unsigned int c = 0; > + > + gbo->placement.placement = gbo->placements; > + gbo->placement.busy_placement = gbo->placements; > + > + if (pl_flag & TTM_PL_FLAG_VRAM) > + gbo->placements[c++].flags = TTM_PL_FLAG_WC | > + TTM_PL_FLAG_UNCACHED | > + TTM_PL_FLAG_VRAM; > + > + if (pl_flag & TTM_PL_FLAG_SYSTEM) >...

...ct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo = drm_gem_vram_of_bo(bo); > + drm_gem_vram_destroy(gbo); > +} > + > +static void drm_gem_vram_placement(struct drm_gem_vram_object *gbo, int pl_flag) > +{ > + unsigned int i; > + unsigned int c = 0; > + > + gbo->placement.placement = gbo->placements; > + gbo->placement.busy_placement = gbo->placements; > + > + if (pl_flag & TTM_PL_FLAG_VRAM) > + gbo->placements[c++].flags = TTM_PL_FLAG_WC | > + TTM_PL_FLAG_UNCACHED | > + TTM_PL_FLAG_VRAM; > + > + if (pl_flag & TTM_PL_FLAG_SYSTEM) >...

I''m doing this ''partial'' to do some ajax auto_complete <ul class="placements"> <% for client in @clients do -%> <li class="placements"> <div class="clwholename"><%=h client.clwholename %></div> <div class="id><span class="informal"><%= client.id %></span></div></li>...

...object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.c index 91f3bbc73e..f7f9f4f4fe 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.c @@ -58,10 +58,10 @@ void qxl_ttm_placement_from_domain(struct qxl_bo *qbo, u32 domain, bool pinned) qbo->placement.placement = qbo->placements; qbo->placement.busy_placement = qbo->placements; - if (domain == QXL_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM) - qbo->placements[c++].flags = TTM_PL_FLAG_CACHED | TTM_PL_FLAG_VRAM | pflag; if (domain == QXL_GEM_DOMAIN_SURFACE) qbo->placements[c++].flags = TTM_PL_FLAG_CACHED | TTM_PL_FLAG_PRIV | pflag;...

I thought I was on top of them all, but found another one that has me completely stumped. table referral_notes belongs_to: placement table placements has_many: referral_notes def list_rfn @placement = Placement.find(:all) # possibly unnecessary @referral_note = ReferralNote.find(:all, :include => [:placement], :conditions => ["placement_id = ?", params[:placement_id] ]) @referral_note_pages, @referral...

...ystem() enforces placement in system memory. Ah, missed that detail. > We > could build a common implementation out of both interfaces, but that > would obfuscate the code IMHO. I'd just leave it as it is. Ok. > >> +struct drm_gem_vram_object { > >> + /* Supported placements are %TTM_PL_VRAM and %TTM_PL_SYSTEM */ > >> + struct ttm_placement placement; > >> + struct ttm_place placements[3]; > > > > placements[2] should be enough I guess? > > TTM_PL_VRAM has index 2 and TTM_PL_SYSTEM has index 0. There's TTM_PL_TT > at index 1...