search for: placement

I''m trying to figure out how to change the order of a list view and it''s obvious to me that I don''t understand what I get from a simple scaffold to know enough to alter it. If someone would be so kind to tell me what this means ... def list @placment_pages, @placements = paginate :placements, :per_page => 10 end @placement_pages, # I am guessing that this calculates the total pages @placements = paginate :placements, # I am guessing that this calculates # pagination from total placements /...

I''ve asked this in various ways but I can''t seem to get much traction - my guess is because not many people are doing this. I am working in a controller/views called placements. Placements belongs_to :client I have a clients model/table - clients has_many :placements in placements/find...this works fine... <%= text_field_with_auto_complete :placement, :clwholename, {} %> if I put the same code into placements/new or placements/edit, I get a No method ''cl...

placement.rb has_one :client has_one :case_manager client.rb belongs_to :case_manager has_many :placements case_manager.rb has_many :clients has_many :placements I am trying to create a view file for placements. I can pull columns from clients table in this view by using... <%= @pla...

because I am a grasshopper... Now that I can sort my ''list''...is there a logical way of not repeating myself to having essentially the same list view with multiple sorts? i.e. def list_cl # ordered by clients last name @placement_pages, @placements = paginate( :placements, :include => [:client], :order_by => ''clients.last_name'', :per_page => 14) end def list_fac # ordered by facility @placement_pages, @placements = paginate( :placements, :include =&...

I am confused. Looking at ''list'' from scaffold, I see a record and click the ''show'' button. I put in a ''link'' at the bottom of ''show.rhtml'' to my ''view'' rfn2.rhtml - action = ''rfn2'', :id = @placement I click this link and get error... log/development.log Processing PlacementsController#rfn2 (for 127.0.0.1 at 2006-02-05 22:44:55) [GET] Parameters: {"action"=>"rfn2", "id"=>"4", "controller"=>"placements"} Placement Load (...

I have a form that prints fine for one particular criteria... facility_id = "X" controller code looks like this... def fac_log @facility = Facility.find(params[:report][:facility_id]) @placement = Placement.find(:all, :conditions => [ "facility_id = ? and discharge_date IS NULL, params[:report][:facility_id] ] ) end I can print out the form with... <%= render :partial => ''fac_log'' %> now I want to print for all facilities... contr...

Previously we were filling it the same as "placements", but in some cases there're valid alternatives that we were ignoring completely. Keeping a back-up memory type helps on several low-mem situations. Signed-off-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez at riseup.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++-------...

I abandoned ruby way for find_by_sql and still can''t get this... @myplacement = Placement.find_by_sql( "select * from placement where :intake_date >= beg_intake_date and :intake_date <= end_intake_date") just a simple date range...it''s killing me - If I knew how to load placement controller into irb, I could probably try out finds interactive mod...

About rationale, usage and (some small bits of) API. Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> --- Changes from v7: * avoid referring to 4.2 release as "upcoming". * libxl placement disabling key explicitly mentioned. * Limit of max 16 NUMA nodes explicitly mentioned. Changes from v6: * text updated to reflect the modified behaviour. * Lines wrapped to a smaller column number. Changes from v5: * text updated to reflect the modified behaviour. Changes from v3: * typos a...

I would swear that I am tracking exactly the method used in Agile book... TypeError in Placements#edit Showing app/views/placements/_form.rhtml where line #33 raised: wrong argument type String (expected Module) Extracted source (around line #33): 30: <tr> 31: <td><label for "type">Type</label></br><%= 32: options = [["Select...

...ruct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = { false, false }; > + > + if (!gbo->pin_count) > + return 0; Likewise. > + --gbo->pin_count; > + if (gbo->pin_count) > + return 0; > + > + if (gbo->kmap.virtual) > + ttm_bo_kunmap(&gbo->kmap); > + > + drm_gem_vram_placement(gbo, TTM_PL_FLAG_SYSTEM); > + for (i = 0; i < gbo->placement.num_placement ; ++i) > + gbo->placements[i].flags |= TTM_PL_FLAG_NO_EVICT; > + > + ret = ttm_bo_validate(&gbo->bo, &gbo->placement, &ctx); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + return 0;...

...ruct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = { false, false }; > + > + if (!gbo->pin_count) > + return 0; Likewise. > + --gbo->pin_count; > + if (gbo->pin_count) > + return 0; > + > + if (gbo->kmap.virtual) > + ttm_bo_kunmap(&gbo->kmap); > + > + drm_gem_vram_placement(gbo, TTM_PL_FLAG_SYSTEM); > + for (i = 0; i < gbo->placement.num_placement ; ++i) > + gbo->placements[i].flags |= TTM_PL_FLAG_NO_EVICT; > + > + ret = ttm_bo_validate(&gbo->bo, &gbo->placement, &ctx); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + return 0;...

can''t seem to find the right syntax for this... /script/../config/../app/controllers/placements_controller.rb:155: syntax error :conditions => [["placements.client_id = ?", params[:client_id] ] and "placements.discharge_date IS NOT NULL" ], this part works... :conditions => ["placements.client_id = ?", params[:client_id] ] this is what I want t...

Dear All I am running Sweave with xtable and want to put the caption placement on top. But this does not work. Any idea what is going wrong? Here is an example that runs properly with the exception of the caption placement in the pdf-file. \documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article} \usepackage{Sweave} \begin{document} <<>>= x = runif(100, 1, 10) y = 2 + 3...

...s considered an implementation > detail and may change in future updates. > > v2: > * rename to |struct drm_gem_vram_object| > * move drm_is_gem_ttm() to a later patch in the series > * add drm_gem_vram_kmap_at() > * return is_iomem from kmap functions > * redefine TTM placement flags for public interface > * documentation fixes > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> > --- > Documentation/gpu/drm-mm.rst | 12 + > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 13 + > drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile |...

...s considered an implementation > detail and may change in future updates. > > v2: > * rename to |struct drm_gem_vram_object| > * move drm_is_gem_ttm() to a later patch in the series > * add drm_gem_vram_kmap_at() > * return is_iomem from kmap functions > * redefine TTM placement flags for public interface > * documentation fixes > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> > --- > Documentation/gpu/drm-mm.rst | 12 + > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 13 + > drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile |...

I''m doing this ''partial'' to do some ajax auto_complete <ul class="placements"> <% for client in @clients do -%> <li class="placements"> <div class="clwholename"><%=h client.clwholename %></div> <div class="id><span class="informal"><%= client.id %></span></div></li>...

qxl surfaces (used for framebuffers and gem objects) can live in both VRAM and PRIV ttm domains. Update placement setup to include both. Put PRIV first in the list so it is preferred, so VRAM will have more room for objects which must be allocated there. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) d...

I thought I was on top of them all, but found another one that has me completely stumped. table referral_notes belongs_to: placement table placements has_many: referral_notes def list_rfn @placement = Placement.find(:all) # possibly unnecessary @referral_note = ReferralNote.find(:all, :include => [:placement], :conditions => ["placement_id = ?", params[:placement_id] ]) @referral_not...

Hi, > This misses the call to drm_gem_vram_placement(), where > drm_gem_vram_push_to_system() enforces placement in system memory. Ah, missed that detail. > We > could build a common implementation out of both interfaces, but that > would obfuscate the code IMHO. I'd just leave it as it is. Ok. > >> +struct drm_gem_vram_o...