search for: pkgutils

I have written a custom package provider for the pkgutil utility on Solaris 10. Pkgutil replaces pkg-get which is not deprecated. All I did was modify the Blastwave provider to use pkgutil instead of pkg- get. I''ve tried two approaches to get the provider on to the client. First, I created a plugin. I created a module called package to contain the plugin. The only file in

Seems that blastwave is all about pkgutil now. Are there any plans to support this? Best, Adam --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Hi the reference to R Internals https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-ints.html#Tools in ?check (PkgUtils.Rd in utils package) is stale. Here is my proposed patch (use named reference rather than numeric reference to avoid any similar broken links in the future). Index: src/library/utils/man/PkgUtils.Rd =================================================================== --- src/library/utils/man/PkgUt...

Hello, I'm running a Mac PowerBook G4 PowerPC with OSX 10.5.8 I was using R 2.12.xx with no problems. I tried to install R 2.13. Have never had any trouble with simply downloading the pkg and installing over previous versions. I did that, selected the packages I use regularly, set them to download with "Install Dependencies" checked and went off to sleep. When I came back in the

On 19/08/2020 12:26 p.m., Toby Hocking wrote: > Hi the reference to R Internals > https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-ints.html#Tools > in ?check (PkgUtils.Rd in utils package) is stale. Here is my proposed > patch (use named reference rather than numeric reference to avoid any > similar broken links in the future). Just to be clear: you're giving the current URL, the problem is it's called "Chapter 6". Duncan Murdoch >...

I have no idea where I must R CMD build... I am using Windows 7 wiht pearl installed http://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-patched/library/utils/html/PkgUtils.html its completely unclear for me ... sorry Knut

...t to check in a new version of the task view that includes packrat and checkpoint, as they seem closer to reproducible research, but also feel like coding tools. There are a few other packages that many would find useful for better coding: devtools, testthat, lintr, codetools, svTools, rbenchmark, pkgutils, etc. This might be some overlap with the HPC task view. I would think that rJava, Rcpp and the like are better suited there but this is arguable. The last time I proposed something like this, Martin deftly convinced me to be the maintainer. It is probably better for everyone if we avoid that on...

...6 major linux package repositories) is 0.9.7a and NOT 0.9.7b . And zlib11 seems to be nonexistent except in the TWW version. Then I realize that these all come from some web site called "thewrittenword.com", I surf to their site, and I realize they have their own custom package manager, pkgutils. I download it and I end up with a file: pkgutils-1.5.14.tar.bz2 ... what the hell is a BZ2 file? Oh, it's some obscure form of compression (is this really so big of a deal we can't use gzip on a 500k file?). So now I go off to try and find an RPM for some sort of bzip compression tool....

> I''m on OSX, and I previously manually installed some test builds to help with > testing. Now when I go and install the official 0.26, the installer claims > that I have a newer version and refuse to install. Does anyone know how I can > fix that? This is a new "feature" in Mac OS 10.6. I am not even sure what it''s trying to accomplish but it gets upset

G''day. We are proud to announce that Puppet 2.7.0RC2 is now available. Notable Features and Bug Fixes: pkgutil provider We have improved pkgutil provider support, resolving #4258 Faces We have made substantial usability improvements to the faces, including documentation accessible through the puppet help subcommand: puppet help <face> [action] There have also been a

Can anyone point me to a procedure to install only the Puppet Agent on a Solaris 10 system for which I do not have root access? Everything I have found online involves using pkgadd and/or pkgutil, both of which require root privileges to run. --Ken -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

Hello, I am running R 1.7.1 on two platforms and it seems to me that order() behaves differently on them. I noticed this when a test case passed in linux but failed on solaris. This is the behavior on the solaris platform: R.Version() $platform [1] "sparc-sun-solaris2.8" $arch [1] "sparc" $os [1] "solaris2.8" $system [1] "sparc, solaris2.8" $status

...ludes packrat and >> checkpoint, as they seem closer to reproducible research, but also >> feel like coding tools. >> >> There are a few other packages that many would find useful for better >> coding: devtools, testthat, lintr, codetools, svTools, rbenchmark, >> pkgutils, etc. >> >> This might be some overlap with the HPC task view. I would think that >> rJava, Rcpp and the like are better suited there but this is arguable. >> >> The last time I proposed something like this, Martin deftly convinced >> me to be the maintainer. It...

...s they seem closer to reproducible research, but also >>>> feel like coding tools. >>>> >>>> There are a few other packages that many would find useful for better >>>> coding: devtools, testthat, lintr, codetools, svTools, rbenchmark, >>>> pkgutils, etc. >>>> >>>> This might be some overlap with the HPC task view. I would think that >>>> rJava, Rcpp and the like are better suited there but this is arguable. >>>> >>>> The last time I proposed something like this, Martin deftly convinc...

...the task view that includes packrat and > checkpoint, as they seem closer to reproducible research, but also > feel like coding tools. > > There are a few other packages that many would find useful for better > coding: devtools, testthat, lintr, codetools, svTools, rbenchmark, > pkgutils, etc. > > This might be some overlap with the HPC task view. I would think that > rJava, Rcpp and the like are better suited there but this is arguable. > > The last time I proposed something like this, Martin deftly convinced > me to be the maintainer. It is probably better for...

...f the task view that includes packrat and > checkpoint, as they seem closer to reproducible research, but also > feel like coding tools. > > There are a few other packages that many would find useful for better > coding: devtools, testthat, lintr, codetools, svTools, rbenchmark, > pkgutils, etc. > > This might be some overlap with the HPC task view. I would think that > rJava, Rcpp and the like are better suited there but this is arguable. > > The last time I proposed something like this, Martin deftly convinced > me to be the maintainer. It is probably better for e...

Hi, I'm new to R and I'm finding it quite a chore trawling through the R documentation to find a function to carry out simple atomic tasks. Is any one aware of R help documentation that is aranged in functional categories for e.g.: String manipulation File I/O Dataframe, List manipulation etc, etc ... Thanks _________________________________________________________________ Get

Hi all, I''m using FreeBSD-9.0-RELEASE. When I install a package via puppet, it seems to use the -STABLE branches instead of -RELEASE. I can use pkg_add -r on the command-line, which will use the -RELEASE branch and break the dependencies. One workaround is to change the $PACKAGESITE variable to "ftp://ftp.ch.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9-stable/Latest/"

Started the discussion in puppet users mailing list based on recommendation from luke. This discussion is to a follow up regarding bug#1955 "Could not find server puppet" - installation/configuration error". jamtur01''s last recommendation: Rather than renaming things try the certname option (see http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/ConfigurationReference). But

...t;> checkpoint, as they seem closer to reproducible research, but also >>> feel like coding tools. >>> >>> There are a few other packages that many would find useful for better >>> coding: devtools, testthat, lintr, codetools, svTools, rbenchmark, >>> pkgutils, etc. >>> >>> This might be some overlap with the HPC task view. I would think that >>> rJava, Rcpp and the like are better suited there but this is arguable. >>> >>> The last time I proposed something like this, Martin deftly convinced >>> me t...