search for: pkgutil

I have written a custom package provider for the pkgutil utility on Solaris 10. Pkgutil replaces pkg-get which is not deprecated. All I did was modify the Blastwave provider to use pkgutil instead of pkg- get. I''ve tried two approaches to get the provider on to the client. First, I created a plugin. I created a module called package...

Seems that blastwave is all about pkgutil now. Are there any plans to support this? Best, Adam --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe fro...

Hi the reference to R Internals https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-ints.html#Tools in ?check (PkgUtils.Rd in utils package) is stale. Here is my proposed patch (use named reference rather than numeric reference to avoid any similar broken links in the future). Index: src/library/utils/man/PkgUtils.Rd =================================================================== --- src/library/utils/man/PkgU...

...nstalling it again. I tried uninstalling it and installing a more recent build from http://r.research.att.com/ I tried uninstalling it and re-installing R 2.12 from the same site. I followed many of the instructions here, ** OS X 10.5 and higher you have to use ** For 32/64 Bit Binary pkg pkgutil --forget org.r-project.R.Leopard.fw.pkg ** For the 32 bit Tiger binary dmg: pkgutil --forget org.r-project.R.framework pkgutil --forget org.r-project.R ** Etc: ** Check for pkgs: pkgutil --pkgs | grep r-project ** UNinstall R rm -rf /Library/Frameworks/R.framework rm -rf...

On 19/08/2020 12:26 p.m., Toby Hocking wrote: > Hi the reference to R Internals > https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-ints.html#Tools > in ?check (PkgUtils.Rd in utils package) is stale. Here is my proposed > patch (use named reference rather than numeric reference to avoid any > similar broken links in the future). Just to be clear: you're giving the current URL, the problem is it's called "Chapter 6". Duncan Murdoch &gt...

I have no idea where I must R CMD build... I am using Windows 7 wiht pearl installed http://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-patched/library/utils/html/PkgUtils.html its completely unclear for me ... sorry Knut

...t to check in a new version of the task view that includes packrat and checkpoint, as they seem closer to reproducible research, but also feel like coding tools. There are a few other packages that many would find useful for better coding: devtools, testthat, lintr, codetools, svTools, rbenchmark, pkgutils, etc. This might be some overlap with the HPC task view. I would think that rJava, Rcpp and the like are better suited there but this is arguable. The last time I proposed something like this, Martin deftly convinced me to be the maintainer. It is probably better for everyone if we avoid that on...

...6 major linux package repositories) is 0.9.7a and NOT 0.9.7b . And zlib11 seems to be nonexistent except in the TWW version. Then I realize that these all come from some web site called "thewrittenword.com", I surf to their site, and I realize they have their own custom package manager, pkgutils. I download it and I end up with a file: pkgutils-1.5.14.tar.bz2 ... what the hell is a BZ2 file? Oh, it's some obscure form of compression (is this really so big of a deal we can't use gzip on a 500k file?). So now I go off to try and find an RPM for some sort of bzip compression tool...

...lish but it gets upset when it looks like you are trying to downgrade a package -even if you thought you uninstalled the newer version of the package. To fix it, go to the Terminal and type: pgkutil --packages Look for the bundle id of the installer package that is giving you trouble then type: pkgutil --forget [the installer package bundle id] Now you should be able to install the package you want. It shouldn''t be too tough to figure out which id is the right one. They are usually strongly related to the organization and product brand involved. Chris.

G''day. We are proud to announce that Puppet 2.7.0RC2 is now available. Notable Features and Bug Fixes: pkgutil provider We have improved pkgutil provider support, resolving #4258 Faces We have made substantial usability improvements to the faces, including documentation accessible through the puppet help subcommand: puppet help <face> [action] There have also been a substantial number of issu...

Can anyone point me to a procedure to install only the Puppet Agent on a Solaris 10 system for which I do not have root access? Everything I have found online involves using pkgadd and/or pkgutil, both of which require root privileges to run. --Ken -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To pos...

Hello, I am running R 1.7.1 on two platforms and it seems to me that order() behaves differently on them. I noticed this when a test case passed in linux but failed on solaris. This is the behavior on the solaris platform: R.Version() $platform [1] "sparc-sun-solaris2.8" $arch [1] "sparc" $os [1] "solaris2.8" $system [1] "sparc, solaris2.8" $status

...ludes packrat and >> checkpoint, as they seem closer to reproducible research, but also >> feel like coding tools. >> >> There are a few other packages that many would find useful for better >> coding: devtools, testthat, lintr, codetools, svTools, rbenchmark, >> pkgutils, etc. >> >> This might be some overlap with the HPC task view. I would think that >> rJava, Rcpp and the like are better suited there but this is arguable. >> >> The last time I proposed something like this, Martin deftly convinced >> me to be the maintainer. It...

...s they seem closer to reproducible research, but also >>>> feel like coding tools. >>>> >>>> There are a few other packages that many would find useful for better >>>> coding: devtools, testthat, lintr, codetools, svTools, rbenchmark, >>>> pkgutils, etc. >>>> >>>> This might be some overlap with the HPC task view. I would think that >>>> rJava, Rcpp and the like are better suited there but this is arguable. >>>> >>>> The last time I proposed something like this, Martin deftly convin...

...the task view that includes packrat and > checkpoint, as they seem closer to reproducible research, but also > feel like coding tools. > > There are a few other packages that many would find useful for better > coding: devtools, testthat, lintr, codetools, svTools, rbenchmark, > pkgutils, etc. > > This might be some overlap with the HPC task view. I would think that > rJava, Rcpp and the like are better suited there but this is arguable. > > The last time I proposed something like this, Martin deftly convinced > me to be the maintainer. It is probably better fo...

...f the task view that includes packrat and > checkpoint, as they seem closer to reproducible research, but also > feel like coding tools. > > There are a few other packages that many would find useful for better > coding: devtools, testthat, lintr, codetools, svTools, rbenchmark, > pkgutils, etc. > > This might be some overlap with the HPC task view. I would think that > rJava, Rcpp and the like are better suited there but this is arguable. > > The last time I proposed something like this, Martin deftly convinced > me to be the maintainer. It is probably better for...

Hi, I'm new to R and I'm finding it quite a chore trawling through the R documentation to find a function to carry out simple atomic tasks. Is any one aware of R help documentation that is aranged in functional categories for e.g.: String manipulation File I/O Dataframe, List manipulation etc, etc ... Thanks _________________________________________________________________ Get

Hi all, I''m using FreeBSD-9.0-RELEASE. When I install a package via puppet, it seems to use the -STABLE branches instead of -RELEASE. I can use pkg_add -r on the command-line, which will use the -RELEASE branch and break the dependencies. One workaround is to change the $PACKAGESITE variable to "ftp://ftp.ch.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9-stable/Latest/"

...Feb_10 svc:/network/puppetd:default (core4) root:/adm/users/andresl # /usr/bin/rm -r /etc/opt/csw/puppet (core4) root:/adm/users/andresl # /usr/bin/rm -r /var/opt/csw/puppet removed puppet entries in /etc/passwd, /etc/group, and /etc/shadow (core4) root:/adm/users/andresl # yes | /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil CSWpuppet -r (core4) root:/adm/users/andresl # pkginfo -l|grep CSW|grep PKGINST PKGINST: CSWpkgutil (core4) root:/var/opt/csw # yes | /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil -i CSWpuppet (core4) root:/var/opt/csw # pkginfo -l|grep CSW|grep PKGINST PKGINST: CSWaspell PKGINST: CSWbdb3 PKGINST: CSWbzip2...

...t;> checkpoint, as they seem closer to reproducible research, but also >>> feel like coding tools. >>> >>> There are a few other packages that many would find useful for better >>> coding: devtools, testthat, lintr, codetools, svTools, rbenchmark, >>> pkgutils, etc. >>> >>> This might be some overlap with the HPC task view. I would think that >>> rJava, Rcpp and the like are better suited there but this is arguable. >>> >>> The last time I proposed something like this, Martin deftly convinced >>> me...