search for: phase

...Dev! David Dean and I just finished bringing up a new build master on lab.llvm.org, llvmlab, which is located at the url http://lab.llvm.org:8013 and is in #llvm under the username llvmlab. llvmlab is different than the current buildbot based continuous integration systems llvm uses; llvmlab is a phased builder based system. The high level details of the phased builder system are as follows: 1. Builders are grouped together into phases as sub builders. Each phase is a builder itself and triggers said grouped ``sub builders'' and assuming that all of the sub builders complete, triggers it...

...;http://lab.llvm.org/>, llvmlab, which is located at the > url http://lab.llvm.org:8013 <http://lab.llvm.org:8013/> and is in #llvm > under the username llvmlab. > > llvmlab is different than the current buildbot based continuous > integration systems llvm uses; llvmlab is a phased builder based system. > The high level details of the phased builder system are as follows: > > 1. Builders are grouped together into phases as sub builders. Each phase > is a builder itself and triggers said grouped ``sub builders'' and > assuming that all of the sub builde...

Do you have anything detailing what the goal of each phase in Xenrt is? Phases 4 and 5 seem to be pretty much identical. Thanks, Paul Larson _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

...ave me the following result: SRV04# du -hc ... [blah blah blah] ... 32M . 32M total --But since /var is allocated about 250 MB it shouldn't be full....?! So I ran fsck, which gave the following output: SRV04# fsck ** /dev/ad4s1a (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on / ** Root file system ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 1451 files, 27915 used, 98924 free (500 frags, 12303 blocks, 0.4% fragmentation) ** /dev/ad4s1e (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /tmp ** Phase 1 - C...

Hello, I am trying to filter a data set like below so that the peaks in the Phase value are more obvious and can be identified by a peak finding function following the useful advise of Carl Witthoft. I have written the following for(i in length(data$Phase)){ newphase=if(abs(data$Phase[i+1]-data$Phase[i])>6){ data$Phase[i+1] }else{data$Phase[i] } } I get the following error...

...quot; model in order to find an alternative way to poll our two "Galaxy 5000 UPS" units. I started the tests with netxml-ups driver. The very first thing I noticed that upsc reports 1/10th of input/output AC voltages. Raw HTTP stream: [...] <OBJECT name='UPS.PowerConverter.Output.Phase[1].ActivePower'>0</OBJECT> <OBJECT name='UPS.PowerConverter.Output.Phase[1].ApparentPower'>0</OBJECT> <OBJECT name='UPS.PowerConverter.Input[2].Phase[11].Voltage'>0</OBJECT> <OBJECT name='UPS.PowerConverter.Input[2].Phase[1].Current'&g...

Richard Lee wrote: > But there is a caveat. Does Vorbis coupling preserve "phase" relations? Any references explaining this in simple detail? Sebastian : >"coupling" is a rather loose term in the sense that it doesn't exactly specify HOW it's done. It can be understood as the opposite of coding channels independently. Obviously there are many ways...

Hi, Are there any functions in R that could be used to estimate the phase-shift between two semi-sinusoidal vectors? Here is what I have tried so far, using the spectrum() function -- possibly incorrectly: # generate some fake data, normalized to unit circle x <- jitter(seq(-2*pi, 2*pi, by=0.1), amount=pi/8) # functions defining two out-of-phase phenomena f1 <...

Dear WizaRds, I am struggling with the use of twophase in package survey. My goal is to compute a simple example in two phase sampling: phase 1: I sample n1=1000 circuit boards and find 80 non functional phase 2: Given the n1=1000 sample I sample n2=100 and find 15 non functional. Let's say, phase 2 shows this result together with phase 1: ........

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Michael Gottesman <mgottesman at apple.com>wrote: > 3. Later phases do broader, longer lasting testing than earlier phases. > Thus the 4 phases we currently have are: > > a. Phase 1 (sanity): Phase 1 is a quick non-bootstrapped, non-lto > compiler build, to check the ``basic sanity'' of the code base and build > process. This genera...

...ing ThinLTO and FullLTO frontend + initial optimization pipeline Le mar. 10 avr. 2018 à 23:18, <katya.romanova at sony.com<mailto:katya.romanova at sony.com>> a écrit : Hi Mehdi, Awesome! It’s a very clear design. The only question left is which pipeline to choose for unified compile-phase optimization pipeline. - ThinLTO compile-phase pipeline? It might very negatively affect compile-time and the memory footprint for FullLTO link-phase. That was the reason why so many optimization were moved from the link-phase to the parallel compile-phase for FullLTO in the first place. J...

I'm using nls to fit periodic gene-expression data to sine waves. I need to set the upper and lower boundaries, because I do not want any negative phase and amplitude solutions. This means that I have to use the "port" algorithm. The problem is, that depending on what start value I choose for phase, the fit works for some cases, but not for others. In the example below, the fit works using phase=pi, but not using phase=0. But there are m...

...TO frontend + initial optimization pipeline > > > > > > Le mar. 10 avr. 2018 à 23:18, <katya.romanova at sony.com> a écrit : > > Hi Mehdi, > > > > Awesome! It’s a very clear design. The only question left is which > pipeline to choose for unified compile-phase optimization pipeline. > > - ThinLTO compile-phase pipeline? It might very negatively affect > compile-time and the memory footprint for FullLTO link-phase. That was the > reason why so many optimization were moved from the link-phase to the > parallel compile-phase for FullLT...

...me know if you'd like to help providing binaries and testing for your favourite platform. If you were a tester on the previous release, I've bcc'd you on this email. I propose this schedule for the 3.7 release: - 14 July 2015: Create the release branch. - 14 July -- 21 July: Testing Phase I. RC1 binaries are built and tested. - 22 July -- 29 July: Fix bugs from Testing Phase I. All new features for the release should be complete. Incomplete features need to be turned off by default. - 30 July -- 6 August: Testing Phase I. RC2 binaries are built and tested. - 7 August - 14 August:...

*I would like to plot some semi-periodic signals as a function of the phase expressed as a value in [0,2PI]* *The problem is that the phase data is reported as the residual of the division by 2PI.* *For instance if the phase is 10.359 rd then:* *15.359 / 6.283185 = 2*6.283185 + 2.79263* *then only the residual 2.79263 is stored. * *In order to plot a number of consecutiv...

I found this sentence in the Ogg format specs: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/doc/vorbis-spec-res.html "A residue vector may represent spectral lines, spectral magnitude, spectral phase or hybrids as mixed by channel coupling." But where does the spectral phase information come from ? AFAIK MDCT doesn't provide any phase information. And in OGG-encoding, MDCT is taking place a few steps before computing the residue vectors. <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http:...

On 19 Jul 2015, at 17:32, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > > On 19 Jul 2015, at 01:44, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > ... >> Hm, strangely enough, this version of the script does not go further than the Phase 2 installation, and does not run any tests? This used to work fine for the release_36 branch. >> >> I think it is because of the "set -o pipefail" which was introduced, but I don't yet understand why this causes the Phase 2 installation to appear to fail, as there is no...

...>> >> >> >> >> Le mar. 10 avr. 2018 à 23:18, <katya.romanova at sony.com> a écrit : >> >> Hi Mehdi, >> >> >> >> Awesome! It’s a very clear design. The only question left is which >> pipeline to choose for unified compile-phase optimization pipeline. >> >> - ThinLTO compile-phase pipeline? It might very negatively affect >> compile-time and the memory footprint for FullLTO link-phase. That was the >> reason why so many optimization were moved from the link-phase to the >> parallel comp...

Hi all, This is a design change proposal to make lld's symbol resolution phase mostly-concurrent without changing the existing semantics. The aim of this change is to speed up the linker on multi-core machines. *Background:* Even though many parts of lld are multi-threaded, the symbol resolution phase is single-threaded. In the symbol resolution phase, the linker does the fo...

Hi, ?I am working with the following list of files: [1] "study_chr1.one.phased.impute2.chunk1"?????????????? [2] "study_chr1.one.phased.impute2.chunk1_info"????????? [3] "study_chr1.one.phased.impute2.chunk1_info_by_sample" [4] "study_chr1.one.phased.impute2.chunk1_summary"?????? [5] "study_chr1.one.phased.impute2.chunk1_warnings&qu...