search for: pcirom

...ot found Mar 25 11:50:53 ivnb kernel: [ 2703.433901] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] checking ACPI for image... Mar 25 11:50:53 ivnb kernel: [ 2703.433905] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] ... signature not found Mar 25 11:50:53 ivnb kernel: [ 2703.433910] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] checking PCIROM for image... Mar 25 11:50:53 ivnb kernel: [ 2703.434142] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] ... appears to be valid Mar 25 11:50:53 ivnb kernel: [ 2703.434150] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] using image from PCIROM Mar 25 11:50:53 ivnb kernel: [ 2703.434323] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] BIT sig...

...53 ivnb kernel: [ 2703.433901] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] > checking ACPI for image... > Mar 25 11:50:53 ivnb kernel: [ 2703.433905] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] > ... signature not found > Mar 25 11:50:53 ivnb kernel: [ 2703.433910] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] > checking PCIROM for image... > Mar 25 11:50:53 ivnb kernel: [ 2703.434142] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] > ... appears to be valid > Mar 25 11:50:53 ivnb kernel: [ 2703.434150] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] > using image from PCIROM > Mar 25 11:50:53 ivnb kernel: [ 2703.434323] nouveau [ VBIOS]...

There appear to be a crop of new hardware where the vbios is not available from PROM/PRAMIN, but there is a valid _ROM method in ACPI. The data read from PCIROM almost invariably contains invalid instructions (still has the x86 opcodes), which makes this a low-risk way to try to obtain a valid vbios image. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76475 Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> Cc: <stable at vger.kernel.o...

...king PROM for image... [ 1.130818] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:03:00.0] ... checksum invalid [ 1.130821] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:03:00.0] checking ACPI for image... [ 1.130822] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:03:00.0] ... signature not found [ 1.130823] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:03:00.0] checking PCIROM for image... [ 1.130829] nouveau 0000:03:00.0: Invalid ROM contents [ 1.130935] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:03:00.0] ... appears to be valid [ 1.130937] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:03:00.0] using image from PCIROM [ 1.131003] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:03:00.0] BIT signature found [ 1.131005...

...11 +200,22 @@ struct methods { const bool rw; }; +#if defined(__powerpc__) + /* + * For now PRAMIN is the only working method on PowerPC + */ +static struct methods nv04_methods[] = { + { "PRAMIN", load_vbios_pramin, true }, + { "PROM", load_vbios_prom, false }, + { "PCIROM", load_vbios_pci, true }, +}; +#else static struct methods nv04_methods[] = { { "PROM", load_vbios_prom, false }, { "PRAMIN", load_vbios_pramin, true }, { "PCIROM", load_vbios_pci, true }, }; +#endif static struct methods nv50_methods[] = { { "PR...

...> [ 0.366279] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] ... signature not found > [ 0.366283] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] checking ACPI for image... > [ 0.366286] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] ... signature not found > [ 0.366290] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] checking PCIROM for image... > [ 0.366454] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] ... appears to be valid > [ 0.366462] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] using image from PCIROM > [ 0.366603] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] BIT signature found > [ 0.366609] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] ve...

...rectly without errors. > Thank you > > 2014-03-27 0:37 GMT+01:00 Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu>: >> There appear to be a crop of new hardware where the vbios is not >> available from PROM/PRAMIN, but there is a valid _ROM method in ACPI. >> The data read from PCIROM almost invariably contains invalid >> instructions (still has the x86 opcodes), which makes this a low-risk >> way to try to obtain a valid vbios image. >> >> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76475 >> Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum...

...g PROM for image... [ 6.471198] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:02:00.0] ... signature not found [ 6.471265] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:02:00.0] checking ACPI for image... [ 6.471328] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:02:00.0] ... signature not found [ 6.471390] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:02:00.0] checking PCIROM for image... [ 6.477478] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:02:00.0] ... appears to be valid [ 6.477549] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:02:00.0] using image from PCIROM [ 6.477789] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:02:00.0] BIT signature found [ 6.477852] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:02:00.0] version 62.79.4e.00.01...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76475 Priority: medium Bug ID: 76475 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Nouveau fails to load due to unknown opcode 0x80 QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: patrick.clara at

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77529 Priority: medium Bug ID: 77529 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: NVS 510 DP-3 output doesn't work QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: tex at sergio.spb.ru

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46059 Bug #: 46059 Summary: bad NV50 only works with "nomodeset" kernel parameter Classification: Unclassified Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium

...g PROM for image... [ 290.058391] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:02:00.0] ... signature not found [ 290.064895] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:02:00.0] checking ACPI for image... [ 290.071710] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:02:00.0] ... signature not found [ 290.078205] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:02:00.0] checking PCIROM for image... [ 290.085961] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:02:00.0] ... appears to be valid [ 290.092511] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:02:00.0] using image from PCIROM [ 290.099003] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:02:00.0] BMP version 5.14 [ 290.105141] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:02:00.0] version 03.1a.01.03.00 [...

...8.584982] [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: ... BIOS signature not found [ 8.584985] [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: Attempting to load BIOS image from PRAMIN [ 8.629799] [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: ... BIOS checksum invalid [ 8.629803] [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: Attempting to load BIOS image from PCIROM [ 8.630444] [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: ... appears to be valid [ 8.630786] [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: BMP BIOS found [ 8.630789] [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: BMP version 5.20 [ 8.630794] [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: Bios version 03.1a.01.03 [ 8.630799] [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: Fou...

...7.040274] [drm] nouveau 0000:06:00.0: ... BIOS signature not found [ 7.040277] [drm] nouveau 0000:06:00.0: Attempting to load BIOS image from PROM [ 7.040292] [drm] nouveau 0000:06:00.0: ... BIOS signature not found [ 7.040295] [drm] nouveau 0000:06:00.0: Attempting to load BIOS image from PCIROM [ 7.046140] [drm] nouveau 0000:06:00.0: ... BIOS checksum invalid [ 7.046143] [drm] nouveau 0000:06:00.0: Attempting to load BIOS image from ACPI [ 7.046146] [drm] nouveau 0000:06:00.0: ... BIOS signature not found [ 7.046148] [drm] nouveau 0000:06:00.0: Using BIOS image from PCIROM [...

...6.642101] [drm] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: ... BIOS signature not found [ 6.642103] [drm] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: Attempting to load BIOS image from PROM [ 6.642121] [drm] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: ... BIOS signature not found [ 6.642123] [drm] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: Attempting to load BIOS image from PCIROM [ 6.642188] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: Invalid ROM contents [ 6.642217] [drm] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: ... BIOS signature not found [ 6.642219] [drm] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: No valid BIOS image found [ 6.642340] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: PCI INT A disabled minimal Xorg config Section "Device...

...gt;> Thank you >> >> 2014-03-27 0:37 GMT+01:00 Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu>: >>> There appear to be a crop of new hardware where the vbios is not >>> available from PROM/PRAMIN, but there is a valid _ROM method in ACPI. >>> The data read from PCIROM almost invariably contains invalid >>> instructions (still has the x86 opcodes), which makes this a low-risk >>> way to try to obtain a valid vbios image. >>> >>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76475 >>> Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin...

...that now nouveau loads correctly without errors. Thank you 2014-03-27 0:37 GMT+01:00 Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu>: > There appear to be a crop of new hardware where the vbios is not > available from PROM/PRAMIN, but there is a valid _ROM method in ACPI. > The data read from PCIROM almost invariably contains invalid > instructions (still has the x86 opcodes), which makes this a low-risk > way to try to obtain a valid vbios image. > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76475 > Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> > Cc...

...[ 2.705670] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed _SB_.PCI0.PEG0.GFX0._ROM, AE_AML_REGION_LIMIT (20120320/psparse-536) [ 2.759759] failed to evaluate ROM got AE_AML_REGION_LIMIT [ 2.759761] [drm] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: ... BIOS signature not found [ 2.759763] [drm] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: Checking PCIROM for VBIOS [ 2.759894] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: Invalid ROM contents [ 2.760356] [drm] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: ... BIOS signature not found [ 2.760357] [drm] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: No valid VBIOS image found Let me know if you need more info and tThanks in advance for your help. Gianluca

Hello everyone, The code is at /core/subdev/bios/init.c. When the executable is 0,these functions that parse the VBIOS init table seems to do nothing except the parsing. And in my opinion,init_exec_force does nothing,too! Then I tried to test it on my computer,when the VBIOS parser tries to change a MMIO register or call a function of struct nouveau_devinit (such as devinit->pll_set,etc.),it

...g PROM for image... [ 24.145196] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:04:00.0] ... signature not found [ 24.145241] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:04:00.0] checking ACPI for image... [ 24.145252] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:04:00.0] ... signature not found [ 24.145262] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:04:00.0] checking PCIROM for image... [ 24.145638] nouveau 0000:04:00.0: Invalid ROM contents [ 24.146181] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:04:00.0] ... signature not found [ 24.146195] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:04:00.0] checking PLATFORM for image... [ 24.146253] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:04:00.0] ... signature not found [...