bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
2014-Apr-16 14:15 UTC
[Nouveau] [Bug 77529] New: NVS 510 DP-3 output doesn't work
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77529
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 77529
Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: NVS 510 DP-3 output doesn't work
QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org
Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: All
Reporter: tex at sergio.spb.ru
Hardware: Other
Status: NEW
Version: unspecified
Component: Driver/nouveau
Product: xorg
DP-3 output doesn't work on NVS 510 (Kepler, NVE7, GK107) card.
As soon as I load nouveau, third output becomes blank. All other outputs,
including the fourth (last one) works fine.
xorg properly detects monitor and its modes on buggy videoout.
xrandr shows monitor as connected and enabled.
I see no errors anywhere.
I've tested only compiled debian kernels 3.10 -- 3.14
Let me know what output should I provide or how could I help to solve this bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20140416/6a1ae60b/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
2014-Apr-16 14:21 UTC
[Nouveau] [Bug 77529] [NVE7] NVS 510 DP-3 output doesn't work
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77529
sergio <mailbox at sergio.spb.ru> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|NVS 510 DP-3 output doesn't |[NVE7] NVS 510 DP-3 output
|work |doesn't work
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20140416/1fbd523c/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
2014-Apr-16 14:44 UTC
[Nouveau] [Bug 77529] [NVE7] NVS 510 DP-3 output doesn't work
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77529 --- Comment #1 from Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- Is it some enormous monitor (resolution-wise)? If so, try a lower resolution. (A change to add support for the higher frequencies went into 3.15-rc1.) Is this a laptop + dock? If so, which ones? Can you check if there's a kworker taking up 100% of cpu time (of 1 cpu)? Is the monitor actually connected via DP, or is it a DP -> HDMI (or DVI) situation? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20140416/9a6f9004/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
2014-Apr-16 15:08 UTC
[Nouveau] [Bug 77529] [NVE7] NVS 510 DP-3 output doesn't work
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77529 --- Comment #2 from sergio <mailbox at sergio.spb.ru> --- (In reply to comment #1)> Is it some enormous monitor (resolution-wise)?No.> Is this a laptop + dock? If so, which ones?No. It is multimonitor, 4xminiDP videocard: http://www.nvidia.com/object/nvs-510-graphics-card.html> Can you check if there's a kworker taking up 100% of cpu time (of 1 cpu)?Checked, no.> Is the monitor actually connected via DP, or is it a DP -> HDMI (or DVI) > situation?All four monitors are connected via Apple miniDP to VGA adapters: http://store.apple.com/us/product/MB572Z/B/mini-displayport-to-vga-adapter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20140416/5997f458/attachment-0001.html>
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
2014-Apr-16 20:01 UTC
[Nouveau] [Bug 77529] [NVE7] NVS 510 DP-3 output doesn't work
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77529 --- Comment #3 from Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- (In reply to comment #2)> (In reply to comment #1) > > Is it some enormous monitor (resolution-wise)? > No. > > > Is this a laptop + dock? If so, which ones? > No. It is multimonitor, 4xminiDP videocard: > http://www.nvidia.com/object/nvs-510-graphics-card.html > > > Can you check if there's a kworker taking up 100% of cpu time (of 1 cpu)? > Checked, no. > > > Is the monitor actually connected via DP, or is it a DP -> HDMI (or DVI) > > situation? > All four monitors are connected via Apple miniDP to VGA adapters: > http://store.apple.com/us/product/MB572Z/B/mini-displayport-to-vga-adapterVery interesting. So you have 4 identical DP->VGA adapters, each plugged into similar (identical?) monitors, and DP-3 is always the one that fails? Can you attach a dmesg when booting with nouveau.debug=VBIOS=trace,PDISP=trace drm.debug=0xe That should provide a bunch of debug info, perhaps even enough to tell what's going on. Additionally, please attach your vbios (/sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/vbios.rom). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20140416/878b9320/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
2014-Apr-16 20:14 UTC
[Nouveau] [Bug 77529] [NVE7] NVS 510 DP-3 output doesn't work
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77529 --- Comment #4 from sergio <mailbox at sergio.spb.ru> --- (In reply to comment #3)> Very interesting. So you have 4 identical DP->VGA adapters, each plugged > into similar (identical?) monitors, and DP-3 is always the one that fails?Right. Four identical DP->VGA adapters, two pairs of identical monitors (2x LG L1710S 1280x1024, 2x DELL E156FP 1024x768)> Can you attach...Tomorrow. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20140416/f932d420/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
2014-Apr-17 11:55 UTC
[Nouveau] [Bug 77529] [NVE7] NVS 510 DP-3 output doesn't work
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77529 --- Comment #5 from sergio <mailbox at sergio.spb.ru> --- Created attachment 97506 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=97506&action=edit dmesg (no monitors connected) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20140417/007b3908/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
2014-Apr-17 11:59 UTC
[Nouveau] [Bug 77529] [NVE7] NVS 510 DP-3 output doesn't work
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77529 --- Comment #6 from sergio <mailbox at sergio.spb.ru> --- Created attachment 97507 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=97507&action=edit dmesg (only DP1 is connected) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20140417/ccdc6165/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
2014-Apr-17 11:59 UTC
[Nouveau] [Bug 77529] [NVE7] NVS 510 DP-3 output doesn't work
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77529 --- Comment #7 from sergio <mailbox at sergio.spb.ru> --- Created attachment 97508 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=97508&action=edit dmesg (only DP3 is connected) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20140417/65d0ce6e/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
2014-Apr-17 12:00 UTC
[Nouveau] [Bug 77529] [NVE7] NVS 510 DP-3 output doesn't work
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77529 --- Comment #8 from sergio <mailbox at sergio.spb.ru> --- Created attachment 97509 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=97509&action=edit vbios.rom (no monitors connected) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20140417/87690b1e/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
2014-Apr-17 12:01 UTC
[Nouveau] [Bug 77529] [NVE7] NVS 510 DP-3 output doesn't work
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77529 --- Comment #9 from sergio <mailbox at sergio.spb.ru> --- Created attachment 97510 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=97510&action=edit vbios.rom (only DP1 is connected) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20140417/998e5afb/attachment-0001.html>
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
2014-Apr-17 12:06 UTC
[Nouveau] [Bug 77529] [NVE7] NVS 510 DP-3 output doesn't work
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77529 --- Comment #10 from sergio <mailbox at sergio.spb.ru> --- vbios.rom with only DP3 connected is the same as with no monitors. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20140417/ba9d25e3/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
2014-Apr-24 20:48 UTC
[Nouveau] [Bug 77529] [NVE7] NVS 510 DP-3 output doesn't work
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77529 --- Comment #11 from Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- I haven't analyzed them, but vbios.rom should _not_ be a function of what's plugged in. I sincerely hope that both of those files are the same. If they're different, perhaps it's because one is retrieved from PROM and the other from PRAMIN or something (as the VBIOS code doesn't copy it to PRAMIN if nothing's plugged in?) Looking at the dmesg's for DP1 vs DP3, a few observations: DP1: [ 8.484516] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] supervisor 00000001 [ 8.484521] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] head 0: 0x00011100 [ 8.484524] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] head 1: 0x00000000 [ 8.484528] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] head 2: 0x00000000 [ 8.484532] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] head 3: 0x00000000 [ 8.484559] nouveau T[ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] 0x5fe1[0]: DONE [ 8.516076] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] supervisor 00000002 [ 8.516080] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] head 0: 0x00011100 [ 8.516083] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] head 1: 0x00000000 [ 8.516087] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] head 2: 0x00000000 [ 8.516090] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] head 3: 0x00000000 [ 8.516114] nouveau T[ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] 0x5fe2[0]: NV_REG R[0x80616600] &= 0xfffffffe |= 0x00000000 [ 8.516118] nouveau T[ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] 0x5fef[0]: DONE [ 8.516367] nouveau T[ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] 0x5e15[0]: NV_REG R[0x00ea80] &= 0xfffffffd |= 0x00000002 [ 8.516371] nouveau T[ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] 0x5e22[0]: SUB_DIRECT 0x5ff1 DP3: [ 8.487921] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] supervisor 00000001 [ 8.487925] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] head 0: 0x00011100 [ 8.487929] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] head 1: 0x00000000 [ 8.487933] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] head 2: 0x00000000 [ 8.487936] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] head 3: 0x00000000 [ 8.487958] nouveau T[ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] 0x5fe1[0]: DONE [ 8.516202] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] supervisor 00000002 [ 8.516206] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] head 0: 0x00011100 [ 8.516210] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] head 1: 0x00000000 [ 8.516213] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] head 2: 0x00000000 [ 8.516217] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] head 3: 0x00000000 [ 8.516236] nouveau T[ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] 0x5fe2[0]: NV_REG R[0x80616600] &= 0xfffffffe |= 0x00000000 [ 8.516240] nouveau T[ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] 0x5fef[0]: DONE [ 8.516482] nouveau T[ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] 0x5b66[0]: SUB_DIRECT 0x5ff1 Note that location 5b66 is executed for DP3 but 5e15 for DP1. Both sub to 5ff1, but the DP1 one also writes to 0xea80 first. Haven't looked at why they call out to different places, but can't think of a reason off-hand. Then when training the link, DP1: [ 8.518909] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: 2 lanes at 270000 KB/s [ 8.519095] nouveau T[ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] 0x5d50[0]: ZM_REG R[0x4061c00c] = 0x01000300 [ 8.519098] nouveau T[ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] 0x5d59[0]: NV_REG R[0x4061c010] &= 0xff0fffff |= 0x00400000 [ 8.519102] nouveau T[ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] 0x5d66[0]: NV_REG R[0x4061c014] &= 0xffffffff |= 0x00000000 [ 8.519106] nouveau T[ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] 0x5d73[0]: DONE [ 8.519116] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: training pattern 1 [ 8.519481] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: config lane 0 00 [ 8.519495] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: config lane 1 00 [ 8.520892] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: status 00 00 00 00 cc cc [ 8.520894] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: config lane 0 38 [ 8.520912] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: config lane 1 38 [ 8.522313] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: status 11 00 00 00 cc cc [ 8.522315] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: training pattern 2 [ 8.523317] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: status 11 00 00 00 cc cc [ 8.523319] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: config lane 0 38 [ 8.523336] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: config lane 1 38 [ 8.525043] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: status 11 00 00 00 88 88 [ 8.525045] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: config lane 0 10 [ 8.525063] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: config lane 1 10 [ 8.526763] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: status 11 00 00 00 44 44 [ 8.526765] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: config lane 0 08 [ 8.526780] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: config lane 1 08 [ 8.528483] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: status 11 00 00 00 00 00 [ 8.528485] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: config lane 0 00 [ 8.528503] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: config lane 1 00 [ 8.530279] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: status 11 00 00 00 44 44 [ 8.530281] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: config lane 0 08 [ 8.530296] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: config lane 1 08 [ 8.531999] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: status 77 00 01 00 44 44 [ 8.532007] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: config lane 0 08 [ 8.532025] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: config lane 1 08 [ 8.533096] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f44: training pattern 0 DP3: [ 8.519010] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: 2 lanes at 270000 KB/s [ 8.519196] nouveau T[ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] 0x5b1a[0]: ZM_REG R[0x4061c00c] = 0x01000300 [ 8.519199] nouveau T[ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] 0x5b23[0]: NV_REG R[0x4061c010] &= 0xff0fffff |= 0x00400000 [ 8.519203] nouveau T[ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] 0x5b30[0]: NV_REG R[0x4061c014] &= 0xffffffff |= 0x00000000 [ 8.519207] nouveau T[ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] 0x5b3d[0]: DONE [ 8.519216] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: training pattern 1 [ 8.519581] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: config lane 0 00 [ 8.519595] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: config lane 1 00 [ 8.520995] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: status 00 00 00 00 cc cc [ 8.520998] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: config lane 0 38 [ 8.521014] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: config lane 1 38 [ 8.522419] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: status 00 00 00 00 cc cc [ 8.522421] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: config lane 0 38 [ 8.522438] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: config lane 1 38 [ 8.523844] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: status 00 00 00 00 cc cc [ 8.523846] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: config lane 0 38 [ 8.523862] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: config lane 1 38 [ 8.525269] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: status 00 00 00 00 cc cc [ 8.525271] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: config lane 0 38 [ 8.525287] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: config lane 1 38 [ 8.526690] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: status 00 00 00 00 cc cc [ 8.526692] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: 2 lanes at 162000 KB/s [ 8.526885] nouveau T[ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] 0x5b3e[0]: ZM_REG R[0x4061c00c] = 0x01000000 [ 8.526888] nouveau T[ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] 0x5b47[0]: NV_REG R[0x4061c010] &= 0xff0fffff |= 0x00300000 [ 8.526893] nouveau T[ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] 0x5b54[0]: NV_REG R[0x4061c014] &= 0xffffffff |= 0x00000000 [ 8.526898] nouveau T[ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] 0x5b61[0]: DONE [ 8.526908] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: training pattern 1 [ 8.527283] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: config lane 0 00 [ 8.527297] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: config lane 1 00 [ 8.528700] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: status 00 00 00 00 cc cc [ 8.528702] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: config lane 0 38 [ 8.528719] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: config lane 1 38 [ 8.530122] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: status 00 00 00 00 cc cc [ 8.530124] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: config lane 0 38 [ 8.530141] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: config lane 1 38 [ 8.531548] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: status 00 00 00 00 cc cc [ 8.531550] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: config lane 0 38 [ 8.531567] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: config lane 1 38 [ 8.532970] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: status 00 00 00 00 cc cc [ 8.532972] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: config lane 0 38 [ 8.532990] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: config lane 1 38 [ 8.534392] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: status 00 00 00 00 cc cc [ 8.534394] nouveau D[ PDISP][0000:01:00.0] DP:0006:0f81: training pattern 0 Which seems like a failure of some sort. The DP3 one falls back to 2x 162MHz lanes, which also fails. However it is still able to get the mode list from DP3. But I think that's done via a side-channel. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20140424/f9c9a296/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
2014-Apr-24 23:11 UTC
[Nouveau] [Bug 77529] [NVE7] NVS 510 DP-3 output doesn't work
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77529 --- Comment #12 from sergio <mailbox at sergio.spb.ru> --- (In reply to comment #11)> If they're different, perhaps it's because one is retrieved from PROM and the > other from PRAMIN or something (as the VBIOS code doesn't copy it to PRAMIN > if nothing's plugged in?)You're right: without monitors: [ 6.701295] nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:01:00.0] BOOT0 : 0x0e73d0a2 [ 6.701366] nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:01:00.0] Chipset: GK107 (NVE7) [ 6.701429] nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:01:00.0] Family : NVE0 [ 6.704392] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] checking PRAMIN for image... [ 6.704462] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] ... signature not found [ 6.704526] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] checking PROM for image... [ 6.816794] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] ... checksum invalid [ 6.816857] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] checking ACPI for image... [ 6.816919] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] ... signature not found [ 6.816981] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] checking PCIROM for image... [ 6.817051] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: Invalid ROM contents [ 6.818327] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] ... appears to be valid [ 6.818392] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] using image from PCIROM [ 6.818642] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] BIT signature found [ 6.818706] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] version 80.07.43.00.0d [ 6.818770] nouveau D[ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] created with DP-1: [ 6.654377] nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:01:00.0] BOOT0 : 0x0e73d0a2 [ 6.654447] nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:01:00.0] Chipset: GK107 (NVE7) [ 6.654510] nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:01:00.0] Family : NVE0 [ 6.657545] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] checking PRAMIN for image... [ 6.657624] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] ... signature not found [ 6.657688] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] checking PROM for image... [ 6.769576] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] ... appears to be valid [ 6.769640] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] using image from PROM [ 6.769894] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] BIT signature found [ 6.769957] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] version 80.07.43.00.0d [ 6.770019] nouveau D[ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] created with DP-3: (Is this the begin of the problem?) [ 6.659517] nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:01:00.0] BOOT0 : 0x0e73d0a2 [ 6.659587] nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:01:00.0] Chipset: GK107 (NVE7) [ 6.659650] nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:01:00.0] Family : NVE0 [ 6.662670] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] checking PRAMIN for image... [ 6.662741] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] ... signature not found [ 6.662804] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] checking PROM for image... [ 6.775445] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] ... checksum invalid [ 6.775510] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] checking ACPI for image... [ 6.775574] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] ... signature not found [ 6.775637] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] checking PCIROM for image... [ 6.775709] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: Invalid ROM contents [ 6.777182] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] ... appears to be valid [ 6.777248] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] using image from PCIROM [ 6.777498] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] BIT signature found [ 6.777562] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] version 80.07.43.00.0d [ 6.777626] nouveau D[ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] created -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20140424/19c3c7c4/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
2014-Apr-25 00:09 UTC
[Nouveau] [Bug 77529] [NVE7] NVS 510 DP-3 output doesn't work
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77529 --- Comment #13 from Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- PCIROM is almost always bad. You want to use PROM. There's a bug on Kepler chips for reading from PROM where it sometimes fails. It should be fixed by https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=18acc6d84eba960804f38a21842c02f3981c1c18 Try either 3.15-rc2 or just apply that commit to your kernel. You may also be able to boot with nouveau.config=NvBios=PROM however you'd still end up with a potentially corrupt vbios. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20140425/2e731f51/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
2015-Jun-03 13:28 UTC
[Nouveau] [Bug 77529] [NVE7] NVS 510 DP-3 output doesn't work
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77529 --- Comment #14 from Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> --- Can you reproduce this issue with a more recent kernel? If you no longer have the problem, this issue should be closed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20150603/b853ae5f/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
2015-Jun-14 12:04 UTC
[Nouveau] [Bug 77529] [NVE7] NVS 510 DP-3 output doesn't work
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77529
Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #15 from Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> ---
Feel free to re-open the issue if the bug still occurs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20150614/3baa5de2/attachment-0001.html>
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [Bug 67628] New: [BISECTED] Monitor on Display port shows distortions
- nouveau graphical corruption in 3.13.2
- [Bug 77674] New: "failed to read DPCD" on wake up with external monitor
- GM206 support?
- [Bug 76483] New: [NV50, bisected, RFC patch] xset dpms force {on, off} does not work over DP