search for: pathology

...Is this crossed and nested interpretation true? If then how can I include these effects as random terms to the model? My response is readers ? diagnosed values. Per patient I have 8 values (2 pathologies, left and right eye and 2 readers) Explanatory variables are actual disease status of each pathology for left and right eyes. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/how-to-write-crossed-and-nested-random-effects-in-a-model-tp4468319p4468319.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Folks, I wonder if anything could be said about the distribution of a random variate x, where x = N(0,1)/N(0,1) Obviously x is pathological because it could be 0/0. If we exclude this point, so the set is {x/(0/0)}, does x have a well defined distribution? or does it exist a distribution that approximates x. (The case could be generalized of course to N(mu1, sigma1)/N(mu2, sigma2) and one

Appdb entry (http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=8352) I'm trying to get all my games to run under linux, but of cause a few are giving me problems, and Pathologic is one of the few that really bothers me. As far as I can tell, the game uses DirectX9, Windows Media format (cinematics), and OpenAL. Of the three, the WMF dependency is the most annoying, as it

I''ve been seeing read and write performance pathologies with Linux ext3 over iSCSI to zvols, especially with small writes. Does running a journalled filesystem to a zvol turn the block storage into swiss cheese? I am considering serving ext3 journals (and possibly swap too) off a raw, hardware-mirrored device. Before I do (and I''ll write up any results) I''d like to know

Author: perrin Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: a593e64c4739242e2eb3a43ea296996000af0c2d Log message: 6413731 pathologically slower fsync on 32 bit systems Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/zfs/sys/zil.h update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/zfs/zil.c

Ubuntu-10.04, x86, stock. I''m running into a situation where a server goes pathological. Basically, it becomes excruciatingly slow. I can get things through the file system, but a simple file touch can take 6 - 12 hours. Top shows various btrfs processes hard at work - typically 100% of a cpu, (four cpu server), and the machine shows a load of just over 4. Some flush-btrfs, some

...ollowing command: >stripchart (dt$fnatg~dt$pat) and works well. it works well also with several options and nuances: >stripchart (dt$fnatg ~ dt$pat, method ="jitter", jitter = 0.3, vertical =TRUE,log="y", pch=1, ylab="Thyroglobulin (ng/mL)",xlab="Surgical Pathology") Now I want my graph to exclude values for which dt$pat == "" I tried: >stripchart (dt$fnatg ~ dt$pat, method ="jitter", subset (dt, dt$pat!=""),jitter = 0.3, vertical =TRUE,log="y", pch=1, ylab="Thyroglobulin (ng/mL)",xlab="Surgic...

Hi, I was wondering if I might be able to ask some advice about doing residual plots for the lmer function in the lme4 package. Our group's aim is to find if the expression staining of a particular gene in a sample (or "core") is related to the pathology of the core. To do this, we used the lmer function to perform a logistic mixed model below. I apologise in advance for the lack of subscripts. logit P(yij=1) = â0 + Ui + â1Patholij where Ui~N(0, óu2), i indexes patient, j indexes measurement, Pathol is an indicator variable (0,1) for benign...

On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 6:02 AM, Peter Dalgaard <p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk> w= rote: > macrakis at alum.mit.edu wrote: >> >> nchar(with(list(2),ls())) gives an internal error. This is of course >> a peculiar call (no names in the list), but the error is not caught >> cleanly. >> >> It is not clear from the documentation whether with(list(2)...) is

How do you disable optimization for a function? I ask because my application often compiles machine-generated code that results in pathological structures that take a long time to optimize, for little benefit. As an example, if a basic block has over a million instructions in it, then DSE can take a while, as it is O(n^2) in the number of instructions in the block. In my application (at least),

...ds[-index], pch = ".") : only 0's may mix with negative subscripts Thanx in advance Dino P.S. I allready sent this message once but without a subject. I apologize for the inconvenience Konstantinos G. Liolios IT Software Engineer II Charles E. and Emma H. Morrison Depts. Pathology and Microbiology-Immunology Northwestern University Ward 3-240 303 E. Chicago Avenue Chicago IL 60611 Tel: 312-503-0224 Fax:312-503-0281 http://www.haldarlab.northwestern.edu ===========End of original message text=========== Konstantinos G. Liolios IT Software Engineer II Charles E. and Emma H....

Hi, I recently came across a situation where "rsync --inplace" performs very poorly. If both the source and destination files contain long sequences of identical blocks, but not necessarily in the same location, the sender can spend an inordinate amount of CPU time finding matching blocks. In my case, I came across this problem while backing up multi-hundred-gigabyte MySQL database

My back-end code generator uses LLVM 5.0.1 to optimize and generate code for x86_64. If I run it on a given sample of IR, it takes almost 5 minutes to generate object code. 95%+ of this time is spent in MergeConsecutiveStores(). (One function has a basic block with 14000 instructions, which is a pathological case for MergeConsecutiveStores.) If, instead, I dump out the LLVM IR, and manually

nchar(with(list(2),ls())) gives an internal error. This is of course a peculiar call (no names in the list), but the error is not caught cleanly. It is not clear from the documentation whether with(list(2)...) is allowable; if it is not, it should presumably give an error. If it is, then ls shouldn't have problems with the resulting environment. > qq <- with(list(2),ls())

On 23/09/2019 20:41, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 11:25 +0200, Francesco Malvezzi via samba wrote: >> hi all, >> >> I updated a small domain with 8k object to samba-4.11.0 and the >> database >> conversion from v1 to v2 didn't take a noticeable time. >> >> On the other hand, in a larger domain with 67k object, where the >>

Dear RHelpers, Does anyone know of any R code to perform bivariate Poisson regression (including random effects)? Best wishes Simon Simon D.W. Frost, M.A., D.Phil. Department of Pathology University of California, San Diego Antiviral Research Center (Formerly: UCSD Treatment Center) 150 W. Washington St., Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92103 USA Tel: +1 619 543 8080 x275 Fax: +1 619 298 0177 Email: sdfrost at ucsd.edu Work W3: http://www.avrctrials.org Personal W3: http://www.simonfrost.c...

We've pretty happy now with a patch that adds two wrappers around SmallVector that make it 1) more convenient to use and 2) will tend to mitigate misuse of SmallVector. We think it's ready for wider discussion: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90884 SVec<T> is a convenience alias for SmallVector<T, N> with N chosen automatically to keep its size under 64 Bytes (that heuristic is easy

...;) However, "stim" is still imported as a factor. I notice there are other read.table options related to this issue, but the help files don't appear to contain much detail on these. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Best wishes Nick Riches -- Lecturer in Speech and Language Pathology Room 1.9 King George VI Building Queen Victoria Road University of Newcastle-upon Tyne NE1 7RU 0191 222 8720 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

hi all, I updated a small domain with 8k object to samba-4.11.0 and the database conversion from v1 to v2 didn't take a noticeable time. On the other hand, in a larger domain with 67k object, where the sudo ./bin/samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix takes ~40 minutes, 2 hours and half were not enough to complete the conversion. Is it a couple of hours something expected if dbcheck takes so

On 3 May 2018 at 03:23, Hiroyuki Chishiro via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > However, aligned memory access instructions (such as 32-bit LW) are > used in this case, and hence my compiler cannot correctly access char > string written in C. This hardware situation was reasonably common in the past, but code still accessed objects not aligned to 32-bits. The compiler