search for: palatible

The Laszlo on Rails effort, bringing the rich web interface of OpenLaszlo (http://openlaszlo.org) to the simplicity of Rails (http://www.rubyonrails.com) will be kicking off next week. We have a list going at http://groups.google.com/group/laszlo-on-rails/ -- 88 people so far and we haven''t even begun! -- but if you really want to be close to the action, email me with your firstname,

Hello, What should the following input produce? Dutch has shifted Germanic g to the velar fricatives [?] and [x], but retained the spelling with <g> and thus at least a visual similarity to German; English and Frisian have shifted g to [j] before palatal vowels The Dingus says: <p>Dutch has shifted Germanic g to the velar fricatives [?] and [x], but retained the spelling

Joseph Ward writes: > I'm aware of at least a couple of fallback options: > ??? -have a self-signed cert for replication and use the Let's Encrypt > one for IMAP/POP > ??? - create firewall rules allowing them to connect to each other over > the public internet so that it can validate the proper cert > ? > These are both much less palatable than simply disabling the

Hi, I have two servers (HA configuration) on which I'm attempting to get replication working over SSL.? They're at two different sites, but connected via a site-site VPN. Everything seems to be fine, except that the certificates are not validating as I'm using IP addresses for the sync, as opposed to the public hostnames for which the certificates are valid, and so I get the

> Despite the name, the flag actually has rather straightforward semantics > from the compiler's perspective. From the gcc docs for > -fdelete-null-pointer-checks: "Assume that programs cannot safely > dereference null pointers, and that no code or data element resides at > address zero." (-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks is the opposite.) Ah, now that's quite a

> On May 18, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > From an end-user's perspective it sounds like the use case for SPIR-V though is a lot more similar to a target though. E.g. the user is notionally telling clang "target SPIR-V" (including doing any IR optimizations, any special "codegenprepare" special passes, etc.), rather than

On 4/18/2018 11:21 AM, Tim Northover via cfe-dev wrote: > On 18 April 2018 at 18:13, Manoj Gupta via cfe-dev > <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Therefore, I would like to implement support for this flag (maybe with a >> different name), > I'd suggest -mdo-what-i-mean; the whole idea is horribly > underspecified, and basically rips up the LangRef in favour of

Now that I've got the recent build of Icecast running (thanks everyone), I'm wondering about an OS X installer. Icecast would be even more palatable to the less-techy OSX users if there were an installer for the binary. As long as the installer checked for the dependent libs, everything would be straight forward. Has this been discussed before? Jaime Magiera University of Michigan

Although this has been discussed in the past, I think that given a few conversations, it seems that it unfortunately needs to be brought up again. There seems to be some disagreement over the ideal location of the unwinder (libunwind). Currently, libunwind resides in a subdirectory of libc++abi. There seems to be some desire from multiple parties that it be moved into compiler-rt or a separate

> From: Damien Miller <djm () mindrot ! org> > Date: 2009-02-17 4:22:05 > Message-ID: alpine.BSO.2.00.0902171519190.1946 () fuyu ! mindrot ! org > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Peter Lambrechtsen wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: >> > I don't think there are any plans to merge the LPK patch. We

Dear R-helpers, I have been inquired about the possibility of developing a web distributed scoring system: a model is created in a central location, users fill a form in their browsers, and the central server calls this model and returns a YES/NO answer to them. I am tempted into using R for this assignment. I have used Rapache for similar tasks, but I am afraid that it is too of a novelty for

> On May 19, 2015, at 1:25 AM, Neil Henning <llvm at duskborn.com> wrote: > > The problem is - as Sean and Pete (and others before) have pointed out, from a users perspective they'll want to say 'clang make me SPIR-V’. The *entire point* of my email was that that is only one of two use cases of SPIR-V. As I said above, it’s a serialization format between a frontend and a

>>>>> "BH" == Bryan Hanson <hanson at depauw.edu> >>>>> on Sun, 31 Jan 2016 09:50:46 -0500 writes: BH> I think the 2nd option will be more palatable to BH> inexperienced users, but both do state the important BH> detail. Bryan >> On Jan 30, 2016, at 4:11 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote:

We''ve finally finished up work on our application and are now beginning our beta. The site (SMS+mobile blogging+event planning+LBS+photos) is built using 100% Ruby on Rails. Many thanks to all the people who answered questions over the months on this list. Our experience with Rails was overwhelmingly positive! We''d love to hear any feedback you might have:

On 30 January 2015 at 20:17, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote: > There is a valid point that the > unwinder supports the compiler in some sense (for exception handling). It > seems that its not particularly as intrinsically tied to the compiler as the > builtins are. Unwinding is not just used for EH, but also debugging, profiling, sanitizers (when in

I thought one nice addition to a splom figure would be to have the scatterplots in the upper triangle and a color-coordinated correlation matrix on the bottom. So I tried my hand at customizing panel.pairs(), and was rebuffed. Many times. Four hours of fruitless debugging later, I turn to you for help: panel.pairs(z=teststatfull[,6:12], pscales=0, panel.subscripts=FALSE, subscripts=,

On starting Asterisk (1.4) I get a whole bunch of WARNING[5858]: pbx_ael.c:4040 ast_compile_ael2: Warning: file /etc/asterisk/extensions.ael, line 932-932: Empty Extension! I find it a bit disturbing that this message has a level of WARNING (instead of NOTICE maybe) because the extensions in question are empty on purpose. The only reason they exist are the hints. hint(SIP/3000) 3000 => {}

Hello! This is the try number two. What was changed: - Added selectable choice in Kconfig file (thanks Jamal!) - Don''t abuse tc_u32_sel to not break backward compatibility (thanks Patrick!). Stephen, do you have any comments on iproute2 part? I know it''s not perfect but this is the best way, I think. "u32 match mark vvvv mmmm" it''s intuitive but breaks a

> On May 19, 2015, at 1:25 AM, Neil Henning <llvm at duskborn.com> wrote: > > The problem is - as Sean and Pete (and others before) have pointed out, from a users perspective they'll want to say 'clang make me SPIR-V'. There are things in SPIR-V that are not representable by the LLVM IR, so we'd have to add SPIR-V specific intrinsics for this (again making the case

On 4/19/2018 11:48 AM, Manoj Gupta via llvm-dev wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:54 PM Tim Northover > <t.p.northover at gmail.com <mailto:t.p.northover at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:02 PM Friedman, Eli > <efriedma at codeaurora.org <mailto:efriedma at codeaurora.org>> wrote: > > > Despite the name, the