search for: outmost

...xt(expression(paste("Volume ( ", paste(m^3/ha, ")"), sep = " ")), outer=T, font = 2, side = 2, line = -1 ) } The mtext() is to replace the ylab because the font = 2 in the above commented line does not result in a bold font as in the xlab. The code within the outmost { } works fine on a windows device but generates error when it runs as a function: Error in mtext(expression(paste("Volume ( ", paste(m^3/ha, ")"), : plot.new has not been called yet Any suggestions to rectify the error? TIA, Richard

...raphics (for the first time). A toy example is given below, run it simply with >foobar() I am wondering why the pink dot and concentric circles are not centered on the 3-color axis system. Further, I feel like the concentric circles don't have the intended radius - if my math is right, the outmost circle should touch the ends of the colored axes. My sense is that this has something to do with my mis-handling of the viewports, but I can't quite see it. Any hints much appreciated! Bryan ************* Bryan Hanson Professor of Chemistry & Biochemistry DePauw University, Greencastle I...

Hello, I'm writing a pass using CodeExtractor to pull out a outmost loop as standalone function. But the 'Module Verifier' issues warning "function-local metadata used in wrong function". After looking through the CodeExtractor code, I found nothing about debugger intrinsics. Is this expected behavior? Thanks, yuanfang

..._mtx)), model="twoway", type="a")) If the matrices are mapped to polar plots (also called bullseye plots) one can visually assess their agreement. Each matrix row defines one circle starting at 0° with columns equally mapped to segments of 3,6° width. The first row defines the outmost circle, the last row defines the inner circle. Here are the corresponding plots for the matrices given above (red is infarction). http://cluster010.ovh.net/~myvideoc/R20130305/LGE.png http://cluster010.ovh.net/~myvideoc/R20130305/PET.png I know, this is not a pure R question but more a general st...

Hi, Here is the function DrawDensity3D in package VecStatGraphs3D. My question is: if we use more layers than one, could we change the function in a way that in the final plot only the outmost layer is drawn (the inner layers omitted)? Best regards, Atte Tenkanen function (vectors, Div = 40, Layers = 3, DrawAxes = FALSE) { open3d(windowRect = c(100, 100, 800, 800)) bg3d("white") Cx = vectors[, 1] Cy = vectors[, 2] Cz = vectors[, 3] Cr <- kde...

...ime. However the compilation of Fa1 is still not finished, and we have what I was trying to prevent. Any errors in my logic, or my understanding of the code? MutexGuards are just mutexes, right? Seems one could use reader/writer lock semantics to force the handing of the pending list only in the outmost runJITOnFunctionUnlocked(...) call. I should also add a test case for the above Fa1, Fa2, Fb, use case in the bug's attachments. Having said this I might be going down a rat hole. It would seem such recursive compilations dependencies would exist for functions in the same module, and these ar...

...how to implement alias queries in IR: > > Yes, and when I suggested replacing it, you said my replacement would > be difficult to generate. That is the point of misunderstanding :] Generating offset+size is not hard. I was asking about how to answer alias(x,y) if we only have offset+size+outmost type. Let's call the alias rule with access path: alias_path(x,y) and call the alias rule with offset+size: alias_offset(x,y) In order to have same answers from alias_path and alias_offset, I thought we have to regenerate the access path at IR level from the offset+size+outmost type informatio...

...e compilation > of Fa1 is still not finished, and we have what I was trying to prevent. Any errors in my logic, or my understanding of the > code? MutexGuards are just mutexes, right? Seems one could use reader/writer lock semantics to force the handing of > the pending list only in the outmost runJITOnFunctionUnlocked(...) call. I should also add a test case for the above Fa1, > Fa2, Fb, use case in the bug's attachments. > > Having said this I might be going down a rat hole. It would seem such recursive compilations dependencies would exist > for functions in the same...

Hi Garrison, I am not a specialist of the code but here is my 2 cents: - I like the idea that in lazy-mode the call (in module or not) is treated by a stub (like every calls). - If the jit is in non-lazy mode, I'm not really fan of the "stub" solution. Is it not possible to use the same mechanism as it already exists : add the function to pending list and emit it after the current

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: > > On Mar 12, 2013, at 12:20 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Mar 11, 2013, at 7:52 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:56 PM,

The patch I recently attached to bug 2606, reproduced here, is my first attempt to solve this issue as represented by the attached test cases. To solve the foreign Module GlobalVariable problem, I modified JIT::getOrEmitGlobalVariable(...) to directly attempt to map a found "external" GlobalVariable. To solve the foreign Module Function problem, I modified both JIT.{h,cpp} and

On Mar 12, 2013, at 12:20 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Mar 11, 2013, at 7:52 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mar 11, 2013, at 4:23 PM,