search for: ontape

So I just spent a frustrating day trying to get smbclient from 4.2.x and master connecting to a NetApp 8.2 box using SMB2 or SMB3 with NTLM auth. Short answer - it doesn't work :-(. Longer answer - the NetApp is choking on something inside the SPNEGO NTLMSSP packets we're sending it - giving the error that it couldn't parse the SPNEGO packet. Unfortunately (and knowing bugger-all

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 03:40:48PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > So I just spent a frustrating day trying to > get smbclient from 4.2.x and master connecting > to a NetApp 8.2 box using SMB2 or SMB3 with > NTLM auth. > > Short answer - it doesn't work :-(. Longer > answer - the NetApp is choking on something > inside the SPNEGO NTLMSSP packets we're sending >

Jeremy Allison wrote on 1/22/15 11:01 AM: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 03:40:48PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: >> So I just spent a frustrating day trying to >> get smbclient from 4.2.x and master connecting >> to a NetApp 8.2 box using SMB2 or SMB3 with >> NTLM auth. >> >> Short answer - it doesn't work :-(. Longer >> answer - the NetApp is choking on

Let''s suppose you rename a file or directory. /tank/widgets/a/rel2049_773.13-4/somefile.txt Becomes /tank/widgets/b/foogoo_release_1.9/README Let''s suppose you are now working on widget B, and you want to look at the past zfs snapshot of README, but you don''t remember where it came from. That is, you don''t know the previous name or location where that

Hi all, Sorry for the OT. I've got an IBM N3300-A10 NAS. It runs Data Ontap 7.2.5.1. The problem is, from the docs it says that it only supports either RAID-DP or RAID4. What I want to achieve is Max Storage Capacity, so I change it from RAID-DP to RAID4, but with RAID4, the maximum disk in a RAID Group decrease from 14 to 7. In the end, either using RAID-DP or RAID4, the capacity is the same.

We are running scripts using smbclient to get some data of NetAPP filer and we run into the output below. After doing some digging, I found that there is a incompatibility between NetAPP Data ONTAP OS and samba. Is this still the case or there is a fix for it. We are running 3.0.10 Any ideas would be great George Client started (version 3.0.10). Connecting to 169.177.18.109 at port 445

Hi All, It appears the NetApp OnTap tftp server we were using doesn't implement the "OpCode: Error Code (5); Error Code: File not found (1)" response." so we just moved the tftp service to RHEL boxes running HPA tftpd. It's essential for our deployment system to locate the pxelinux config specific to an installation request based on it's MAC address. If the MAC based

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.13 release series. Changes since 4.13.3 -------------------- o Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> * BUG 14607: Work around special SMB2 IOCTL response behavior of NetApp Ontap 7.3.7. * BUG 14612: Temporary DFS share setup doesn't set case parameters in the same way as a

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.13 release series. Changes since 4.13.3 -------------------- o Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> * BUG 14607: Work around special SMB2 IOCTL response behavior of NetApp Ontap 7.3.7. * BUG 14612: Temporary DFS share setup doesn't set case parameters in the same way as a

Hello list, with dovecot 1.2 on AIX rquota RPC calls fail with quota-fs: remote ext rquota call failed: RPC: 1832-012 Program/version mismatch when using a netapp filer. This is what netapp says: Bug ID 97288 Title Support requested for rquota version 2 Bug Severity 5 - Suggestion Bug Status Closed Product Data ONTAP Bug Type NFS Description Linux has implemented its own extensions

Hello: Platform: CentOS 6.7 x86-64 $ rpm -qa | grep samba samba-common-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 samba4-libs-4.2.10-6.el6_7.x86_64 ie-samba-utils-3.6.13-7.x86_64 samba-winbind-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 samba-client-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 samba-winbind-clients-3.6.23-30.el6_7.i686 samba-winbind-clients-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64 Problems began after requiring SMB signing (I forgot the specifics but it was

If a file is stored directly on a DFS enabled share, renaming fails with NT_STATUS_OBJECT_PATH_NOT_FOUND. The usecase may sound unusual, but a customer is using NetApp ONTAP 9, which by default advertises DFS capabilities for all shares, and he cannot disable it for policy reasons. I can also reproduce the issue with smbd and Windows Server 2012 R2 (haven't checked with other versions).

Hi, For anyone who is interested; I created some basic scripts based on my current iSCSI block script. http://kinkrsoftware.nl/contrib/xen/block-netapp http://kinkrsoftware.nl/contrib/xen/netapp-lun.py Basically these two scripts allow you to start a vfiler with a qtree of customers. You log in the NetApp upon boot, and can use: netapp://customer1/disk1 It is work in progress... because I

Hi, For anyone who is interested; I created some basic scripts based on my current iSCSI block script. http://kinkrsoftware.nl/contrib/xen/block-netapp http://kinkrsoftware.nl/contrib/xen/netapp-lun.py Basically these two scripts allow you to start a vfiler with a qtree of customers. You log in the NetApp upon boot, and can use: netapp://customer1/disk1 It is work in progress... because I

I am experiencing an odd problem while attempting to mount and access a directory with smbfs. smbclient does not exhibit the same behavior. I have created a directory /mnt/smb-test and am attempting to mount a volume from a NetApp Filer running OnTap 7 with NTFS security mode. An Active Directory DC handles security for the share. The Linux machine shows as registered in AD and I can use

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:27:17PM +0200, Christoph Ziebuhr via samba wrote: > If a file is stored directly on a DFS enabled share, renaming fails with > NT_STATUS_OBJECT_PATH_NOT_FOUND. > The usecase may sound unusual, but a customer is using NetApp ONTAP 9, which > by default advertises DFS capabilities for all shares, and he cannot disable > it for policy reasons. > I can also

we are tried setup CENTOS 4.6 with Informix Dynamic server version 10 UC8 on DELL 6800. The problem we have is while doing bdatabase backup (ontape), we have error happen. I guess the error come from "semaphoe". server semaphore are: # sysctl -a|grep sem kernel.sem = 250 32000 128 128 # sysctl -a|grep shm vm.hugetlb_shm_group = 0 kernel.shmmni = 4096 kernel.shmall = 4194304 kernel.shmmax = 2147483648 Does an...

Rsync has begun failing to replicate a kerberos samba mount point. This mount point has worked previously, but recently an attempt to replicate the mount point returns; lseek failed in map_ptr rsync error: error in file IO (code 11) at fileio.c(228) rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4092 bytes: phase "unknown": Broken pipe rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code

The problem you describe below is fixed in Data NOTAP 5.3x. If you're on an older version, you might want to upgrade. There's another issue, though. The fix for which should be in the next release of Data ONTAP, which isn't far off (sorry for being vague). If you're interested in a good NetApp mailing list that's not run by NetApp, drop an email to:

Hi, I'm trying to add a NetApp (Data Ontap 8.1.4) to a Samba 4.1.6 domain and it is failing with the message "Setup cannot connect to an LDAP server for the NETAPP.TEST active directory domain, and so cannot continue". I compared network packets exchanged between netapp/samba and netapp/win2008R2 and the difference is that samba returns 0 results to the query filter