search for: ntfi

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 81 matches for "ntfi".

Did you mean: ntfs
2003 Sep 29
1
Can't place a call with MGCP Phone
Hello, I have just received an MGCP Phone for test purpose and I can't place a call from my MGCP Phone. I can call my MGCP phone from a SIP Phone. Here is my mgcp.conf: ; ; MGCP Configuration for Asterisk ; [general] ;port = 2427 ;bindaddr = 0.0.0.0 ;[dlinkgw] ;host = 192.168.0.64 ;context = default ;line => aaln/2 ;line => aaln/1 [192.168.10.10] host = 192.168.10.10 context =
2018 Jun 22
2
Can't build pigeonhole against dovecot 2.3.2rc1
Help? ntfy-mailto.c: In function ?ntfy_mailto_send?: ntfy-mailto.c:505:5: error: too few arguments to function ?smtp_address_create_from_msg_temp? sieve_get_postmaster(senv)); ^ In file included from ./../../../sieve-types.h:5:0, from ./../../../sieve-common.h:7, from ntfy-mailto.c:30: /usr/local/include/dovecot/smtp-address.h:101:5: note:
2004 May 13
0
MGCP channel problem
Hello I have a problem with my MGCP voice gateway. I use D-Link DG104S Boot PROM Version 3.0B38-D Firmware Version 3.0T86-D I tried asterisk v 0.7.2 and I am using latest CVS version now. When I dial a number very fast, or when I use a redial function, my asterisk receives coupled digits. My co-worker called number 245005111, these are a few lines of my debug. The identifier of first digit
2003 Jun 30
3
MGCP with Cisco doesn't work
I'm trying to link up Cisco MGCP-enabled router (residential gateway) with Asterisk, and it looks like some sort of protocol mismatch, could it be MGCP 0.1 vs 1.0? Look at this (x.x.x.99 is the router, x.x.x.98 is Asterisk): MGCP read: NTFY 2 aaln/0@voip-gw1 MGCP 0.1 X: 0 O: hd from 192.168.154.99:2427MGCP read: NTFY 2 aaln/0@voip-gw1 MGCP 0.1 X: 0 O: hd from 192.168.154.99:2427Verb:
2023 Dec 05
0
[PATCH] nouveau/gsp: add three notifier callbacks that we see in normal operation (v2)
Add NULL callbacks for some things GSP calls that we don't handle, but know about so we avoid the logging. v2: Timur suggested allowing null fn. Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/r535.c
2018 Jun 22
0
Can't build pigeonhole against dovecot 2.3.2rc1
Try using branch master-0.5 Aki > On 22 June 2018 at 21:24 tai74 at vfemail.net wrote: > > > Help? > > ntfy-mailto.c: In function ?ntfy_mailto_send?: > ntfy-mailto.c:505:5: error: too few arguments to function > ?smtp_address_create_from_msg_temp? > sieve_get_postmaster(senv)); > ^ > In file included from ./../../../sieve-types.h:5:0, >
2004 Jan 22
2
MGCP Problem.
Hi. I'm new in Asterisk with MGCP. I set up a MGCP user agent and start asterisk with the next configuration files. '--------------- extensions.conf ---------------------------------------------------- [general] static=yes writeprotect=yes [globals] ap1 => mgcp/aaln/ap200@64.76.148.186 [macro-apl1] exten => s,1,Dial(${ARG1},30,Ttmr) ;exten => s,2,Voicemail(u${MACRO_EXTEN})
2023 Dec 05
1
[PATCH] nouveau/gsp: add three notifier callbacks that we see in normal operation
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 09:07, Timur Tabi <ttabi at nvidia.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 08:55 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > +static int > > +r535_gsp_msg_ucode_libos_print(void *priv, u32 fn, void *repv, u32 repc) > > +{ > > + /* work out what we should do here. */ > > + return 0; > > +} > > This is part of my logrm debugfs
2019 Jun 12
0
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau/kms/gf119-: add ctm property support
This adds support on GF119:GV100 (exclusive) for CTM (aka CSC). Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- v1 -> v2: - ctm -> csc - mark csc.valid = false when there is no ctm property drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/atom.h | 6 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base907c.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c | 16 +++++
2019 Jun 21
0
[PATCH v2 06/18] drm/nouveau: use embedded gem object
Drop drm_gem_object from nouveau_bo, use the ttm_buffer_object.base instead. Build tested only. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 5 ----- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 4 ++--
2019 Jun 11
1
[PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau/kms/gf119-: add ctm property support
This adds support on GF119:GV100 (exclusive) for CTM (aka CSC). Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/atom.h | 6 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base907c.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c | 13 +++++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.h | 4 ++ 4 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
2013 Mar 05
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: idle channel before releasing notify object
Unmapping it while it's still in use (e.g. by M2MF) can lead to page faults and a lot of TRAP_M2MF spam in dmesg. Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c index 4124192..3b6dc88 100644
2019 Jun 28
0
[PATCH v3 06/18] drm/nouveau: use embedded gem object
Drop drm_gem_object from nouveau_bo, use the ttm_buffer_object.base instead. Build tested only. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 5 ----- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 4 ++--
2019 Aug 02
0
[PATCH v4 06/17] drm/nouveau: use embedded gem object
Drop drm_gem_object from nouveau_bo, use the ttm_buffer_object.base instead. Build tested only. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 5 ----- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 4 ++--
2019 Aug 05
0
[PATCH v5 06/18] drm/nouveau: use embedded gem object
Drop drm_gem_object from nouveau_bo, use the ttm_buffer_object.base instead. Build tested only. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 5 ----- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 4 ++--
2019 Aug 05
0
[PATCH v6 06/17] drm/nouveau: use embedded gem object
Drop drm_gem_object from nouveau_bo, use the ttm_buffer_object.base instead. Build tested only. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 5 ----- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 4 ++--
2017 Aug 03
0
[PATCH 17/29] drm/nouveau: switch to drm_*{get, put} helpers
drm_*_reference() and drm_*_unreference() functions are just compatibility alias for drm_*_get() and drm_*_put() adn should not be used by new code. So convert all users of compatibility functions to use the new APIs. Signed-off-by: Cihangir Akturk <cakturk at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 2 +-
2004 Dec 22
1
MGCP Transaction identifiers
I know this is not the most appropriated list to this, but I will try: Does anyone know what is the criteria to the generation of the transaction identifiers in MGCP? I mean, are they generated by a randomic method? I'm using Asterisk and MGCP eyeP Phone and observed that the RSIP and NTFY (methods created by the gateway) use high values in the transaction identifiers, while the RQNT, AUEP,
2012 Nov 22
0
[resend PATCH] drm/nouveau: unpin buffers before releasing to prevent lockdep warnings
This will otherwise cause a lockdep splat if reservations were a real lock type, so warn when nouveau forgets to unpin a buffer, and fix up the ones I've hit. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c index cc79c79..acc6b08 100644 ---
2017 Aug 03
0
[PATCH 17/29] drm/nouveau: switch to drm_*{get, put} helpers
Looks good to me! Reviewed-by: Tobias Klausmann <tobias.johannes.klausmann at mni.thm.de> On 8/3/17 1:58 PM, Cihangir Akturk wrote: > drm_*_reference() and drm_*_unreference() functions are just > compatibility alias for drm_*_get() and drm_*_put() adn should not be > used by new code. So convert all users of compatibility functions to use > the new APIs. > >