search for: nogroups

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8483 Summary: rsync: chown failed: Permission denied (13) Product: rsync Version: 3.0.8 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: cas at totallylost.org

Hello I use a new samba server with LDAP support as PDC for some Windows2000 and WindowsXP machines. All is working nice. The useer can login with a user/password in the domain, we have remote profiles, the user can access the samba shares and print etc. But after some time (< 1 day) we get a smbstatus output like the attached file. Users are connected multiple times with the same share

On Tue, 23 May 2017 16:34:29 +0200 Asbjorn Taugbol via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Yes, the users exist as both Linux and Samba users. My question was > if the Windows client user "Admin" also needs to be Linux and Samba > user. > There is no windows user called 'Admin', there is one called 'Administrator', if it is the later, then it

On Samba 4.3.11 Server (Ubuntu 14.04 and 16.04) : find this issues on negoziation on windows 10 clients: 26283 nobody nogroup 192.168.2.170 (ipv4:192.168.2.170:50114) Unknown (0x0311) 26283 nobody nogroup 192.168.2.170 (ipv4:192.168.2.170:50114) Unknown (0x0311) 26283 nobody nogroup 192.168.2.170 (ipv4:192.168.2.170:50114) Unknown (0x0311) 26283

Hi Folks, Small office setup, 3 computers, 3 staff. Recently updated system and rebooted. Today, I am seeing crazy amounts of the same listing for clients (294 lines!) and open files... (snipped content below, you really don't want PAGES of it!) $ smbstatus Samba version 4.3.11-Ubuntu PID Username Group Machine Protocol Version

I am thankful for all support received so far and I feel I'm getting closer to a solution. To get back to basics and a more transparent setup I have made a clean Ubuntu 16.04 installation and followed this guide https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Standalone_Server Windows clients users are logged in with username Admin (local account, administrator). The samba share is

Hello, I have a samba-4.9.1 serving a tmp space that I would like to write to without authentication. The smb.conf is: [global] workgroup = DIRECTORY interfaces = 10.10.10.1 bind interfaces only = Yes security = user map to guest = Bad User rndc command = /bin/true server role = STANDALONE netbios name = filer log level = 3

I'm running samba on a local linux server, with a bunch of shares. Over the last several years, this has worked perfectly in our heterogenous network of OS X and Windows. All my windows clients still work perfectly - my users can mount the samba shares and create, rename, move etc files and folders. However, recently (starting yesterday) my OS X clients are unable to rename any sub

Hello Everybody, I was searching for an answer myself for quite some time without success, so I hope somebody can clarify...I use rsync to sync webcontent from one server to another. Apache-details: * Apache runs as nobody:nogroup. * Source-Server-Rights htdocs: The rsync-user gains access via o+rx * Destination-Server-Rights htdocs: The rsync-user is in the group 'nogroup', gains

I asked about this a few days ago, but none of the suggestions have made any difference... asking again in the hopes I'll find more things to try.... Linux: Ubuntu 9.10 Samba version: 3.4.0 OS X 10.6.2 I'm running samba on a local linux server, with a bunch of shares. Over the last several years, this has worked perfectly in our heterogenous network of OS X and Windows. All my windows

Hi all. I thying settings the option "hide unreadable" but not work. I tested in global section and share section, follow my settings now. after various tests. # Global parameters [global] workgroup = BATLAB realm = BATLAB.CORP netbios name = GAUSS server role = active directory domain controller server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl,

Hi all, I have a bug with Version 2.2.3a-12 for Debian GNU/Linux (custom 2.4.20 kernel with aacraid support (DELL PowerEdge 1650 with RAID mirror, etc)): Some users have, SOMETIMES, a READ ONLY set on files, where no one except them use this files. I'm in oplocks=false because of MS-Excel 97 issues, and, no need of fast performances at the moment (<10 users). I put a /home/public

Begin forwarded message: > From: Kimball Larsen <kimball at miridiatech.com> > Date: February 2, 2010 7:58:49 PM MST > To: Andy Liebman <andyliebman at aol.com> > Subject: Re: [Samba] OS X Clients Can't Create Sub-Directories > > > On Feb 2, 2010, at 6:53 PM, Andy Liebman wrote: > >> >> Kimball Larsen wrote: >>> I'm running

"Warning: mail_extra_groups setting was often used insecurely so it is now deprecated, use mail_access_groups or mail_privileged_group instead" I use the following: mail_extra_groups = mail nogroup Because I have the real and virtual accounts. What's the correct way to replace the above line? It seems that mail_privileged_group only accepts one group, but I need two. Any

I am running Ubuntu 12.04 using winbind to connect to an Windows 2008 AD server. I use autofs to map the home directories, the only problem is the owner is reading nobody nogroup. Does anyone have any idea what I'm doing wrong? This worked in 10.10 Here are my config files. Let me know if you want to look at anything else. smb.conf ------- [global] security = ads realm = domain.com password

I have successfully configured winbind in 12.04 on a VM, but when I tried to install it on a physical box using the exact same process my permissions are screwed up. On my home directory which is mounted using autofs from an nfs4 file server the permissions are showing nobody:nogroup I've tried everything I could, I even rsynced the etc directory from my working VM to my non-working physical

Using samba 4.0.9 as an AD DC (no other domain servers). Since my UIDs and GIDs have changed, I was doing cleanup: find /srv/svn/ -xdev '(' -nouser -o -nogroup ')' -ls I noticed this was very slow -- iostat reported only about 2tps and 50kB/s to my disks. So I timed it with nsswitch.conf users & groups set to "files" vs. "files winbind": # with

David Allan Finch wrote: > Has anyone considerd modify the Unix encypt to use > the same system as NT. IE the encypted pasword in the > /etc/passwd or NIS/NIS+ table is the same for both? Err. That would be a *really* bad idea. See the l0phtcrack source for details :-). Seriously, though. The password hashes used on NT are very poor. They don't use salt and people are now

I just committed the --with-group option for configure. One thing is not quite what I like, but I have no idea how to script this in autoconf. Currently both RUN_AS_USER and RUN_AS_GROUP have the defaults "nobody" and "nogroup" respectively. I think this really should be changed to the following: - if neither --with-user, nor --with-group are specified, we apply the defaults

hi everybody we have been reading through the archives for quite some time now, and could not find a solution to our problem. please excuse if we overlooked something and our question was already answered elsewhere... we have Samba version 3.0.14a-Debian running on (you guessed it) debian with kernel 2.6.8-2-386. ever since our migration from samba 2.x we have speed issues with an ms