search for: nogroup

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8483 Summary: rsync: chown failed: Permission denied (13) Product: rsync Version: 3.0.8 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: cas at totallylost.org

...Debian Service uid gid pid machine ---------------------------------------------- kr kr users 10724 pc33 (192.168.1.33) Tue Feb 11 08:42:02 2003 js js users 10566 pc40 (192.168.1.40) Tue Feb 11 07:58:31 2003 IPC$ nobody nogroup 5935 pc45 (192.168.1.45) Mon Feb 10 15:34:55 2003 transfer fr users 5935 pc45 (192.168.1.45) Mon Feb 10 12:00:49 2003 jm jm users 6838 pc39 (192.168.1.39) Mon Feb 10 15:07:48 2003 IPC$ nobody nogroup 5124 pc53 (192.168.1.53) Mo...

On Tue, 23 May 2017 16:34:29 +0200 Asbjorn Taugbol via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Yes, the users exist as both Linux and Samba users. My question was > if the Windows client user "Admin" also needs to be Linux and Samba > user. > There is no windows user called 'Admin', there is one called 'Administrator', if it is the later, then it

On Samba 4.3.11 Server (Ubuntu 14.04 and 16.04) : find this issues on negoziation on windows 10 clients: 26283 nobody nogroup 192.168.2.170 (ipv4:192.168.2.170:50114) Unknown (0x0311) 26283 nobody nogroup 192.168.2.170 (ipv4:192.168.2.170:50114) Unknown (0x0311) 26283 nobody nogroup 192.168.2.170 (ipv4:192.168.2.170:50114) Unknown (0x0311) 26283 nobody nogroup 192.1...

...d open files... (snipped content below, you really don't want PAGES of it!) $ smbstatus Samba version 4.3.11-Ubuntu PID Username Group Machine Protocol Version ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 25788 nobody nogroup 10.10.0.10 (ipv4:10.10.0.10:57187) Unknown (0x0311) 25788 nobody nogroup 10.10.0.10 (ipv4:10.10.0.10:57187) Unknown (0x0311) 26105 nobody nogroup 10.10.0.12 (ipv4:10.10.0.12:54640) Unknown (0x0311) 25788 nobody nogroup 10.10.0.10 (ipv...

...read only = No ##################################### root at ubuntuTest:/srv# smbstatus Samba version 4.3.11-Ubuntu PID Username Group Machine Protocol Version ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------ 2981 nobody nogroup 10.10.1.70 (ipv4:10.10.1.70:50058) Unknown (0x0311) 2981 nobody nogroup 10.10.1.70 (ipv4:10.10.1.70:50058) Unknown (0x0311) 2981 nobody nogroup 10.10.1.70 (ipv4:10.10.1.70:50058) Unknown (0x0311) 2981 nobody nogroup 10.10.1.70 (ipv...

...= /var/tmp/samba The permissions of the directory are: (infra) [~] ls -al /var/tmp/samba total 60 drwxrwxrwx 12 root root 4096 Nov 2 20:58 ./ drwxrwxrwt 68 root root 12288 Nov 2 21:00 ../ -rw-r--r-- 1 sithglan sithglan 745 Jul 15 23:35 authorized_keys drwxr-xr-x 2 nobody nogroup 4096 Sep 22 20:56 v100/ drwxr-xr-x 2 nobody nogroup 4096 Oct 28 16:24 v101/ drwxr-xr-x 2 nobody nogroup 4096 Oct 28 16:24 v102/ drwxr-xr-x 2 nobody nogroup 4096 Oct 8 11:25 v103/ drwxr-xr-x 2 nobody nogroup 4096 May 13 2017 v104/ drwxr-xr-x 2 nobody nogroup 4096 Sep 10...

.../samba/panic-action %d max log size = 1000 unix extensions = no [Neighborhood] comment = Who are the people in your neighborhood... path = /mnt/brick/Neighborhood public = yes writable = yes create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 force user = nobody force group = nogroup And here are the permissions on the root of the share: root at jake:/mnt/brick# ls -la | grep Neighborhood drwxrwxrwx 46 nobody nogroup 2360 2010-02-02 15:31 Neighborhood And the "Advertising" directory where I want to create a sub directory. root at jake:/mnt/brick/Neighborhood# ls -l...

Hello Everybody, I was searching for an answer myself for quite some time without success, so I hope somebody can clarify...I use rsync to sync webcontent from one server to another. Apache-details: * Apache runs as nobody:nogroup. * Source-Server-Rights htdocs: The rsync-user gains access via o+rx * Destination-Server-Rights htdocs: The rsync-user is in the group 'nogroup', gains access via owner rsync-user and g+rwx, htdocs-group is 'nogroup' I use the following command: /usr/bin/rsync -topglrcze ssh --d...

.../usr/share/samba/panic-action %d max log size = 1000 unix extensions = no [Neighborhood] comment = Who are the people in your neighborhood... path = /mnt/brick/Neighborhood public = yes writable = yes create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 force user = nobody force group = nogroup And here are the permissions on the root of the share: root at jake:/mnt/brick# ls -la | grep Neighborhood drwxrwxrwx 46 nobody nogroup 2360 2010-02-02 15:31 Neighborhood And the "Advertising" directory where I want to create a sub directory. root at jake:/mnt/brick/Neighborhood# ls -l...

....bmp hide dot files = Yes hide unreadable = Yes hide unwriteable files = Yes write list = @g_administracao read list = @g_administracao The permission for directory "/administracao" root at gauss:# ls -l administracao/ total 80 d--------- 2 nobody nogroup 20480 Nov 4 20:36 adm_batlab d--------- 3 nobody nogroup 4096 Nov 4 20:30 Agenda BATLAB ---------- 1 nobody nogroup 48128 Nov 10 2010 ATOS 001 EDVALDO.xls root at gauss:# getfacl administracao/ # file: administracao/ # owner: nobody # group: nogroup user::--- group::--- other::--- root at gaus...

...(DELL PowerEdge 1650 with RAID mirror, etc)): Some users have, SOMETIMES, a READ ONLY set on files, where no one except them use this files. I'm in oplocks=false because of MS-Excel 97 issues, and, no need of fast performances at the moment (<10 users). I put a /home/public with nobody.nogroup rights. Each users is in "nogroup" group too. force user=nobody on this share set force create mask=0664 on this share And, here what I have!!! : First file has NO PROBLEM, second one HAS "READ ONLY" ERROR, (but not if the file is REOPEN again): -rw-rw-r-- 1 nobody nogro...

...borhood] >>> comment = Who are the people in your neighborhood... >>> path = /mnt/brick/Neighborhood >>> public = yes >>> writable = yes >>> create mask = 0777 >>> directory mask = 0777 >>> force user = nobody >>> force group = nogroup >>> >>> >>> And here are the permissions on the root of the share: >>> root at jake:/mnt/brick# ls -la | grep Neighborhood >>> drwxrwxrwx 46 nobody nogroup 2360 2010-02-02 15:31 Neighborhood >>> >>> And the "Advertising" di...

"Warning: mail_extra_groups setting was often used insecurely so it is now deprecated, use mail_access_groups or mail_privileged_group instead" I use the following: mail_extra_groups = mail nogroup Because I have the real and virtual accounts. What's the correct way to replace the above line? It seems that mail_privileged_group only accepts one group, but I need two. Any suggestion? Thank you! -- Linux 2.6.24: Arr Matey! A Hairy Bilge Rat! http://u-br.net http://www.abusar.org/FEL...

I am running Ubuntu 12.04 using winbind to connect to an Windows 2008 AD server. I use autofs to map the home directories, the only problem is the owner is reading nobody nogroup. Does anyone have any idea what I'm doing wrong? This worked in 10.10 Here are my config files. Let me know if you want to look at anything else. smb.conf ------- [global] security = ads realm = domain.com password server = pdc.domain.com bdc.domain.com workgroup = DOMAIN idmap config * : ba...

I have successfully configured winbind in 12.04 on a VM, but when I tried to install it on a physical box using the exact same process my permissions are screwed up. On my home directory which is mounted using autofs from an nfs4 file server the permissions are showing nobody:nogroup I've tried everything I could, I even rsynced the etc directory from my working VM to my non-working physical machine and ran meld on the two and saw no apparent differences. The only difference I can see would be hardware. Any ideas?

Using samba 4.0.9 as an AD DC (no other domain servers). Since my UIDs and GIDs have changed, I was doing cleanup: find /srv/svn/ -xdev '(' -nouser -o -nogroup ')' -ls I noticed this was very slow -- iostat reported only about 2tps and 50kB/s to my disks. So I timed it with nsswitch.conf users & groups set to "files" vs. "files winbind": # with "files" root at gumbo:~# time find /srv/svn/ -xdev \...

David Allan Finch wrote: > Has anyone considerd modify the Unix encypt to use > the same system as NT. IE the encypted pasword in the > /etc/passwd or NIS/NIS+ table is the same for both? Err. That would be a *really* bad idea. See the l0phtcrack source for details :-). Seriously, though. The password hashes used on NT are very poor. They don't use salt and people are now

I just committed the --with-group option for configure. One thing is not quite what I like, but I have no idea how to script this in autoconf. Currently both RUN_AS_USER and RUN_AS_GROUP have the defaults "nobody" and "nogroup" respectively. I think this really should be changed to the following: - if neither --with-user, nor --with-group are specified, we apply the defaults "nobody" and "nogroup" (or whatever are sane defaults) - if both --with-user and --with-group are specified, use the valu...

...share containing only the database file (which is about 410MB in size), with no success. after comparing the old 2.x setup with the new one, we noticed that on 2.x (where everything ran smooth) guest access was enabled and everybody was accessing the DB as user "nobody" of group "nogroup", so we tried the same setup on our 3.x server, forcing user "nobody" and group "nogroup" on our new 3.x server, hoping that would solve the problem. nada. we have tried changing the tcp send/receive buffer size after reading through tcpdump logs, but that was proba...