Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "msg00573".
Did you mean:
msg00073
2018 May 25
2
Re: virRandomBits - not very random
...e that right after reboot there's going to be enough
> entropy. Every service that's starting wants some random bits. But it's
> probably better than what we have now.
Here's where we left things last time it came up:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-December/msg00573.html
If gnutls has an interface that will give us random bits
(gnutls_key_generate() in 3.0, perhaps), we should use THAT for all of
our random bits (and forget about a seed), except when we are mocking
things in our testsuite, and need a deterministic PRNG from a
deterministic seed.
If not (...
2018 May 29
2
Re: [libvirt] virRandomBits - not very random
...enough
>>> entropy. Every service that's starting wants some random bits. But it's
>>> probably better than what we have now.
>>
>> Here's where we left things last time it came up:
>>
>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-December/msg00573.html
>>
>> If gnutls has an interface that will give us random bits
>> (gnutls_key_generate() in 3.0, perhaps), we should use THAT for all of
>> our random bits (and forget about a seed), except when we are mocking
>> things in our testsuite, and need a deterministic P...
2018 May 30
2
Re: [libvirt] virRandomBits - not very random
...ce that's starting wants some random bits. But it's
>>>>> probably better than what we have now.
>>>>
>>>> Here's where we left things last time it came up:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-December/msg00573.html
>>>>
>>>> If gnutls has an interface that will give us random bits
>>>> (gnutls_key_generate() in 3.0, perhaps), we should use THAT for all of
>>>> our random bits (and forget about a seed), except when we are mocking
>>>> things in o...
2018 Jun 01
2
Re: [libvirt] virRandomBits - not very random
...gt;> > > > > > probably better than what we have now.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Here's where we left things last time it came up:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-December/msg00573.html
>> > > > >
>> > > > > If gnutls has an interface that will give us random bits
>> > > > > (gnutls_key_generate() in 3.0, perhaps), we should use THAT for all of
>> > > > > our random bits (and forget about a seed), except...
2018 May 29
0
Re: [libvirt] virRandomBits - not very random
...t there's going to be enough
>> entropy. Every service that's starting wants some random bits. But it's
>> probably better than what we have now.
>
>Here's where we left things last time it came up:
>
>https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-December/msg00573.html
>
>If gnutls has an interface that will give us random bits
>(gnutls_key_generate() in 3.0, perhaps), we should use THAT for all of
>our random bits (and forget about a seed), except when we are mocking
>things in our testsuite, and need a deterministic PRNG from a
>determini...
2018 May 29
0
Re: [libvirt] virRandomBits - not very random
...entropy. Every service that's starting wants some random bits. But it's
>>>> probably better than what we have now.
>>>
>>> Here's where we left things last time it came up:
>>>
>>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-December/msg00573.html
>>>
>>> If gnutls has an interface that will give us random bits
>>> (gnutls_key_generate() in 3.0, perhaps), we should use THAT for all of
>>> our random bits (and forget about a seed), except when we are mocking
>>> things in our testsuite, and ne...
2018 Jun 01
0
Re: [libvirt] virRandomBits - not very random
...ts. But it's
> > > > > > probably better than what we have now.
> > > > >
> > > > > Here's where we left things last time it came up:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-December/msg00573.html
> > > > >
> > > > > If gnutls has an interface that will give us random bits
> > > > > (gnutls_key_generate() in 3.0, perhaps), we should use THAT for all of
> > > > > our random bits (and forget about a seed), except when we are moc...
2018 Jun 01
0
Re: [libvirt] virRandomBits - not very random
...gt; > probably better than what we have now.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Here's where we left things last time it came up:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-December/msg00573.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If gnutls has an interface that will give us random bits
> > > > > > > (gnutls_key_generate() in 3.0, perhaps), we should use THAT for all of
> > > > > > > our random bits (and forge...
2018 May 25
3
Re: virRandomBits - not very random
Reviving an ancient thread:
On 11/04/2014 02:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 11:09:12AM -0500, Brian Rak wrote:
>> I just ran into an issue where I had about 30 guests get duplicate mac
>> addresses assigned. These were scattered across 30 different machines.
>>
>> Some debugging revealed that:
>>
>> 1) All the host machines were