search for: msg00073

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "msg00073".

Did you mean: msg00053
2007 Mar 02
1
Help Regarding Badblocks check in kick start installation very
Dear All, In Redhat 7.2 kick start installation,badblocks check for HDD is working on creating partition. But in Centos badblocks check is not working in kick start installation. Badblocks check command in kickstart file part / --fstype ext3 --badblocks --size 1000 part /home --fstype ext3 --badblocks --size 12000 part /usr --fstype ext3 --badblocks --size 9000 part swap
2003 Apr 08
2
nasty ext3 problem
Using kernel 2.4.20 with the following patches ext3-scheduling-storm.patch ext3-use-after-free.patch sync_fs-fix-2.patch sync_fs-fix.patch sync_fs.patch Note: this problem started happening before applying the patches I have a small partition for / since I don't have much there. Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sda6 303344 98934
2017 May 16
5
[lld][ELF] Add option to make .dynamic read only
Hi, This is a proposal to add an option to lld that forces .dynamic sections to be read-only. The .dynamic section is almost read-only except for the DT_DEBUG entry which requires the dynamic linker to modify a word. MIPS has long since had a solution to this using the DT_MIPS_RLD_MAP entry to give a pointer to another section which is writable. It would be nice to have this functionality on
2011 Mar 20
5
The delays on CentOS 5.6 are causing EPEL incompatibilities
There are significant components of the upstream 5.6 release which are stuck behind the CentOS 5.6 release process, but are now incorporated in EPEL 5 components. In particular, the "php53" package is now necessary for the "drupal6" EPEL components, due to the long out of date PHP 5.1 in the default upstream vendor's codebase. I see that some of these components are
2006 Sep 05
9
4.4 upgrade problems
...be happening only on CentOS. This is also not true. The upstream provider tells everyone to "Handle it via Support Calls" and not the Mailing List ... and sometimes not even via the public bugzilla. As an example see this: https://www.redhat.com/archives/anaconda-devel-list/2006-August/msg00073.html Then they create proprietary (non public) bugzilla entries to track and fix issues. That is their prerogative, however because of that not all fixes are done in public view. We try to move these things also into the public view (again ... in the above example): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/...
2018 Jan 17
14
[PATCH 0/9] Add filters to nbdkit.
...: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-January/msg00079.html "[PATCH nbdkit v2 0/3] Refactor plugin_* functions into a backend" The rest of the patches add filters using the new filter API previously described here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-January/msg00073.html This needs a lot more testing -- and tests -- and I also want to write a couple of more complicated filters to prove the point that the API allows different plugin methods to be called from a single filter method. However the two included filters (delay and offset) do appear to work well. R...