search for: ms

How do I allow traceroute to reach my server? Pings work fine but traceroute stops at the last hop before my server. If I shut off the firewall it reaches it fine. PING danicar.net (24.222.246.120): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 24.222.246.120: icmp_seq=0 ttl=237 time=104.0 ms 64 bytes from 24.222.246.120: icmp_seq=1 ttl=237 time=74.9 ms 64 bytes from 24.222.246.120: icmp_seq=2 ttl=237 time=90.6 ms --- danicar.net ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 74.9/89.8/104.0 ms root@jabber:/home/jgofton# tracero...

Anybody else having problems accessing this site? Haven''t had much luck over the past couple of days. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...outdated or something is wrong with IP assigning or I am not understanding it. Please let me know. By the way, my traceroutes die somewhere is Houston… traceroute 69.22.5.124 traceroute to 69.22.5.124 (69.22.5.124), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets 1 * * * 2 65.213.121.129 (65.213.121.129) 0.932 ms 0.641 ms 0.636 ms 3 Loopback0.GW5.EWR1.ALTER.NET (137.39.4.120) 1.199 ms 1.111 ms 1.115 ms 4 119.ATM4-0.XR2.EWR1.ALTER.NET (152.63.20.238) 1.269 ms 1.621 ms 1.270 ms 5 192.at-2-0-0.XR2.NYC9.ALTER.NET (152.63.17.242) 1.984 ms 1.863 ms 1.739 ms 6 0.so-2-1-0.XL2.NYC9.ALTER.NET (152.63...

Hello all, I would like to connect two IPv4-only networks through global IPv6-only network with tinc. Could anyone tell me how to configure tinc.conf and the other config files? Thanks in advance, Ichiro Tinc: Discussion list about the tinc VPN daemon Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/ Tinc site: http://tinc.nl.linux.org/

The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the webmaster should happen to read this...

Hello, I''ve got this problem. There is an linux server with 2.4.24 kernel and pinging from him to internet (or from lan) ping randomly jumps up: 64 bytes from fortas.ktu.lt (193.219.160.131): icmp_seq=387 ttl=59 time=30.0 ms 64 bytes from fortas.ktu.lt (193.219.160.131): icmp_seq=388 ttl=59 time=32.6 ms 64 bytes from fortas.ktu.lt (193.219.160.131): icmp_seq=389 ttl=59 time=34.9 ms 64 bytes from fortas.ktu.lt (193.219.160.131): icmp_seq=390 ttl=59 time=198 ms 64 bytes from fortas.ktu.lt (193.219.160.131): icmp_seq=391...

...:34:17] NOTICE[1010] chan_sip.c: Registration from '"912" <sip:1 at 41.1.1.1>' failed for '184.106.217.112' - Wrong password C:\>tracert 184.106.217.112 Tracing route to 184-106-217-112.static.cloud-ips.com [184.106.217.112] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.10.199 2 5 ms 3 ms 2 ms 192.168.1.197 3 11 ms 14 ms 8 ms 196-210-138-1.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.210.138.1] 4 14 ms 9 ms 11 ms cdsl1-rba-vl2360.ip.isnet.net [196.38.73.133] 5 10 ms 9 ms 9 ms cdsl1-rba-vl150.ip.isnet.n...

...ave an address for a maintainer, or know what's going on? cheers Ben Bolker ben at bolker-lap2:~$ ping wiki.r-project.org PING econum.umh.ac.be (193.190.194.5) 56(84) bytes of data. ^C --- econum.umh.ac.be ping statistics --- 8 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 6999ms ben at bolker-lap2:~$ traceroute wiki.r-project.org traceroute to wiki.r-project.org (193.190.194.5), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 ctx-5500-n060.core.ufl.edu (128.227.60.1) 2.072 ms 2.182 ms 2.330 ms 2 128.227.111.233 (128.227.111.233) 0.393 ms 0.413 ms 0.535 ms 3 ctx36-nexus-msfc-1-...

...t; v >>>> 192.168.3.86 linux workstation >>>> >>>>> $ sudo traceroute 192.168.3.86 >>>>> traceroute to 192.168.3.86 (192.168.3.86), 64 hops max, 40 byte >>>>> packets >>>>> 1 HQFirewallRS.com (10.0.128.1) 0.575 ms 0.423 ms 0.173 ms >>>>> 2 * * * >>>>> 3 192.168.3.86 (192.168.3.86) 47.972 ms 45.174 ms 49.968 ms >>>>> >>>>> No response from the FreeBSD "B" box. >>>>> >>>>> When I do a tcpdump on "B...

Hi, I'm trying to download new Ogg Vorbis rpms, and I get a "no route to host" error for fatpipe.vorbis.com for the past several hours. traceroute tells me: $ /usr/sbin/traceroute fatpipe.vorbis.com traceroute to motherfish-II.xiph.org (198.136.36.245), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets 1 GE-0-0-25.core0.interware.hu (195.70.32.193)...

...pings, only TCP, and its associated netblock level3 doesn't echo UDP, but does echo ICMP and TCP." But, for me, this is what a traceroute returned just now on Centos: $ traceroute www.centos.org ... early hops removed ... 16 ae-6-6.ebr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.148.201) 211.850 ms ae-3-3.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.132.78) 205.221 ms ae-6-6.ebr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.148.201) 207.392 ms 17 ae-3-3.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.132.78) 128.453 ms ae-73-73.csw2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.151.145) 160.451 ms ae-93-93.csw4.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.151.169) 160.437 ms...

I'm running samba-3.0.2-7.FC1 on a Fedora Core 1 box. I see this error message in the log file for each user on my network; [2004/03/26 10:55:35, 0] rpc_server/srv_util.c:get_domain_user_groups(372) get_domain_user_groups: primary gid of user [glen] is not a Domain group ! get_domain_user_groups: You should fix it, NT doesn't like that What does it mean? Martin Stacey IT Support

Hi, i want to parse a XML-File. I made some Tutorial but with my special Format it don't work. An Example of my format: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?> <mzML xmlns="http://psi.hupo.org/ms/mzml" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://psi.hupo.org/ms/mzml http://psidev.info/files/ms/mzML/xsd/mzML1.1.0_idx.xsd" version="1.1"> <cvList count="3"> <cv id="MS" fullName="P...

HI, I''m having trouble with a debian etch HVM domU inside a dom0 domu >From domU, I try to ping gateway, but response time change if tcpdump is writing to standard output. Ping without tcpdump running has a 4 ms time. While tcpdump is writing in stdout, in another terminal: # ping -n -c20 10.12.6.1 PING 10.12.6.1 (10.12.6.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.448 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.421 ms 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time...

Hallo, is there a Freepbx mailinglist? or can this be posted here? Best Regards,

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: rebecca.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 414 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060515/4cd2f87d/rebecca.vcf

...elnet to port 25 on IPv6? >From AT&T host to Linode host: [root at saruman ~]# traceroute6 2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:febc:e22d traceroute to 2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:febc:e22d (2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:febc:e22d), 30 hops max, 80 byte packets 1 2001:1890:1837:5b00::1 (2001:1890:1837:5b00::1) 3.230 ms 3.181 ms 3.137 ms 2 2001:1890:c05:2f3a::ee6e:61cd (2001:1890:c05:2f3a::ee6e:61cd) 6.906 ms 6.901 ms 6.870 ms 3 ok3ca81crs.ipv6.att.net (2001:1890:ff:ffff:12:123:6:98) 8.305 ms 8.254 ms 8.258 ms 4 sffca21crs.ipv6.att.net (2001:1890:ff:ffff:12:122:110:65) 14.199 ms 14.164 ms 14.153 m...

I am looking into supporting around 20 SIP clients (ATAs, IP softphones, etc) distributed in around 10 different end points (in South America). For the most part they all have narrow band connections 64kpbs, 128 at most and I?d like to use g729 all around (don?t have too many alternatives) To start with, I will have one * with no gateway to the PSTN and eventually a few * boxes with termination

...t an IP address. i post the output here: 133.133.133.40 is the IP address of gateway 133.133.134.171 is the IP address of the PVM domU [root@localhost ~]# ping 133.133.133.40 PING 133.133.133.40 (133.133.133.40) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 133.133.133.40: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.824 ms 64 bytes from 133.133.133.40: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.491 ms 64 bytes from 133.133.133.40: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.495 ms 64 bytes from 133.133.133.40: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.437 ms 64 bytes from 133.133.133.40: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.459 ms 64 bytes from 133.133.133.40: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 tim...

Greetings to all, This is my model: aov.fit<-aov(Y~A+B+C+D+E+A:C+A:E) In summary(aov.fit) all F values are comptuted by eg MS(A)/MS(Residuals). This is not correct (or what I want), except for F(B) and F(A:E). I suppose P values are not correct either. Is it possible with aov to define the way F computations will be done? I 'd like them to be like this: F(A)=MS(A)/MS(E), F(C)=MS(C)/MS(E), F(D)=MS(D)/MS(E), F(E)=MS(E)...