asterisk users - Sep 2019 - FREEPBX Mailinglist

Hallo,
is there a Freepbx mailinglist? or can this be posted here?

Best Regards,

Howdy,

There is not.  FreePBX users operate via a forums at:

https://community.freepbx.org

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 8:19 AM basti <mailinglist at unix-solution.de>
wrote:
> Hallo,
> is there a Freepbx mailinglist? or can this be posted here?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> Check out the new Asterisk community forum at:
> https://community.asterisk.org/
>
> New to Asterisk? Start here:
>       https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


-- 
--------------------------------------------------
Malcolm Davenport
Digium - a Sangoma company | Senior Product Manager
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US
Tel/Fax: +1 256 428 6252
malcolmd at sangoma.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20190911/93b7c1d9/attachment.html>

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019, at 10:18 AM, basti wrote:
> Hallo,
> is there a Freepbx mailinglist? or can this be posted here?
FreePBX does not have a mailing list. People use the community forum[1] instead.

[1] https://community.freepbx.org/

-- 
Joshua C. Colp
Digium - A Sangoma Company | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org

On 11.09.19 at 15:24 Joshua C. Colp wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019, at 10:18 AM, basti wrote:
>> Hallo,
>> is there a Freepbx mailinglist? or can this be posted here?
> 
> FreePBX does not have a mailing list. People use the community forum[1]
instead.
> 
> [1] https://community.freepbx.org/
This forum of freepbx is quite a PITA (and therefore quite unusable), at least
from (some (don't know if all) providers of) Germany. It takes 1 minute or
more to load
(each! site). The IP 199.102.239.92 produces packet loss on a huge scale. Even
reducing the mss size to 900(!) doesn't have any effect. I can see this
since years or
better: I never saw it w/o package loss.

# ping 199.102.239.92
PING 199.102.239.92 (199.102.239.92) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 199.102.239.92: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=124 ms
64 bytes from 199.102.239.92: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=124 ms


# traceroute -T 199.102.239.92
traceroute to 199.102.239.92 (199.102.239.92), 30 hops max, 52 byte packets
 1  * * *
 2  x.x.x.x (62.155.245.70)  7.841 ms  7.874 ms  7.868 ms
 3  y.y.y.y (217.5.116.234)  10.882 ms  10.916 ms  10.912 ms
 4  z.z.z.z (217.5.116.234)  10.908 ms  10.904 ms  10.909 ms
 5  62.157.249.186 (62.157.249.186)  22.582 ms  22.609 ms  23.037 ms
 6  ae-1.r25.frnkge08.de.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.4.16)  25.279 ms  24.443 ms 
24.543 ms
 7  ae-8.r22.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.4.96)  103.701 ms  104.829 ms 
117.578 ms
 8  ae-0.r23.asbnva02.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.85)  102.750 ms  102.776 ms 
115.097 ms
 9  ae-3.r21.chcgil09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.2.139)  122.340 ms  121.706 ms 
119.258 ms
10  ae-16.r08.chcgil09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.2.204)  122.853 ms
ae-2.r07.chcgil09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.4.214)  114.721 ms  117.954 ms
11  ae-1.a01.chcgil09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.5.94)  119.707 ms
ae-0.a01.chcgil09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.4.218)  122.066 ms  120.186 ms
12  129.250.199.66 (129.250.199.66)  121.861 ms  125.719 ms  122.840 ms
13  static.66.185.29.254.cyberlynk.net (66.185.29.254)  125.742 ms  126.253 ms 
124.522 ms
14  * wi-mke1-dc2-c5-47-haf-7578.cyberlynk.net (66.185.29.26)  118.165 ms *
15  199.102.239.92 (199.102.239.92)  122.352 ms  126.759 ms  123.944 ms
16  199.102.239.92 (199.102.239.92)  123.890 ms  124.069 ms  126.670 ms


Thanks
Michael