search for: monadic

Not sure if this has application for R but Microsoft's new Monad shell is now in public beta. I have not looked at it myself but I wonder if the tools that are required to create Windows R packages could be replaced by this? ---- The Monad team has recently released Monad Beta 3.1 to Microsoft Download Center and we're working diligently towards a release of Monad 1.0! As adoption of

On Tue, Nov 09, 1999 at 11:39:39AM +0100, Mariusz Marcinkiewicz wrote: > After reading lcamtuf's posts I decided write this one. Few months ago one > of my friends - digit - found bug in linux nfsd daemon. I made example > sploit about IV 1999. Now in distributions is new nfsd and nowhere was > information about security weaknes of old version! Well, one gets used to people

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Security Advisory Synopsis: Buffer overflow in cron daemon Advisory ID: RHSA-1999:030-01 Issue date: 1999-08-25 Updated on: Keywords: vixie-cron crond MAILTO Cross references: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Topic: A buffer overflow exists in crond, the cron

I'd like to develop, if there is not one already, an interface between R code and Haskell code, to allow R code to call Haskell (compiled) code, and vice-versa. But in the interest of not reinventing the wheel, does anyone on this list know of existing bindings for Haskell code? There is support for loading plugins in Haskell, and for an eval() like set of functions provided by the Haskell

Source: xen-api-libs Version: 0.5.2-3 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[2]: Entering directory `/?PKGBUILDDIR?/stdext' > ocamlfind ocamlc -I ../xml-light2 -I ../stdext -I

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hi all, Prompted by Mark''s discussion of the transname patch I''ve put together an experimental patch to the Linux nfsd that supports something I''ve named CDFs for lack of a more appropriate name. They''re not real CDFs, and in particular, they won''t let you manage stuff like shared /etc directories for diskless

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Security Advisory Synopsis: Denial of service attack in syslogd Advisory ID: RHSA-1999:055-01 Issue date: 1999-11-19 Updated on: 1999-11-19 Keywords: syslogd sysklogd stream socket Cross references: bugtraq id #809 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Topic: A

I've got egg on my face... There is a nasty security hole in the User-space NFS servers. If you are running an NFS server, please upgrade as soon as possible to the latest release, nfs-server-2.2beta35.tar.gz, which can be found at ftp://linux.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/pub/linux/people/okir All previous releases are vulnerable. <Taking off his okir hat and putting on his caldera

It seems that when you send rwhod an rwho packet, it blindly assumes you are who the packet says you are. That is to say, it looks as if any host can inject false rwho data for any other host. I''m not convinced this is worth fixing. Opinions? -- - David A. Holland | VINO project home page: dholland@eecs.harvard.edu | http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/vino

Hi there, some of the recent holes discussed on this list, and David Holland''s suggestion for a utmp manager daemon got me thinking. I ended up coding a sample program that demonstrates how a `resource manager'' can be used to allow applications access to certain resources while not giving them any privileges. The sample program is a primitve modem manager that hands out open

Package: xen-api-libs I cannot backport xen-api-libs to an oldstable system. It fails with: $ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc dpkg-buildpackage: source package xen-api-libs dpkg-buildpackage: source version 0.5.2-3.1 dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by St?phane Glondu <glondu at debian.org> dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture amd64 dpkg-source --before-build xen-api-libs-0.5.2

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ld.so Vulnerability A buffer overflow problem was reported on bugtraq affecting the ELF and a.out program loaders on Linux. This problem can possibly be exploited by malicious users to obtain root access. On Linux, programs linked against shared libraries execute some code contained in /lib/ld.so (for a.out binaries) or /lib/ld-linux.so (for ELF

Summary: you can exploit a single-byte buffer overrun to gain root privs. When, half a day after releasing version 2.2beta37 of the Linux nfs server, I received a message from Larry Doolittle telling me that it was still vulnerable to the root exploit posted to bugtraq, I was ready to quit hacking and start as a carpenter... Tempting as that was, I didn''t, and started looking for the

Hi everyone, I have some question about the Xenopsd. I’ve read the wiki document but cannot understand where to use it, Is this different with XAPI ? What’s the main work for? Can anyone describe it more clearly about it? Thanks a lot!! _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-users

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Security Advisory Synopsis: New majordomo packages available Advisory ID: RHSA-2000:005-05 Issue date: 2000-01-20 Updated on: 2000-05-31 Product: Red Hat Powertools Keywords: majordomo Cross references: N/A

On 2/6/2017 10:40 ??, Philippe BOURDEU d'AGUERRE wrote: > Reverting to rpcbind-0.2.0-38.el7 solves the problem for me Thank you very much Philippe, I notice that I have upgraded to rpcbind-0.2.0-38.el7_3.x86_64 on May 26. Have you checked if this bug/behavior has been reported or should we file a bug report? Nick

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Security Advisory Synopsis: new NFS server packages available (5.2, 4.2) Advisory ID: RHSA-1999:053-01 Issue date: 1999-11-11 Updated on: 1999-11-11 Keywords: nfs-server PATH_MAX NAME_MAX rpc.nfsd Cross references: Bugtraq id #782 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.

On 2/6/2017 1:46 ??, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > After a bit of search, I found the associated reports: > > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=13351 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1454876 > > No solution yet, but -as a workaround- it seems that -at least- nfs > problems are indeed solved with downgrading. I have been working fine with CentOS 7.3, since I

Hi all, I just looked into LPRng to see to what extent it is affected by the problems recently reported for the BSD lpd. It seems that it is fairly safe from those mentioned in the SNI advisory. > Problem 1: File creation > > Individuals with access to the line printer daemon from a privileged > port on a valid print client can tell lpd to create a file, providing > the name of

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:34 AM, Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy at imag.fr> wrote: > Patrick Meredith <pmeredit at uiuc.edu> writes: > >> Memory is what the i32* points too. The i32* itself is in a >> register. You can store to it as many times as you want, but you >> can't change the address, because that would violate SSA. > > Thanks, > > For the